Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Powered by Borscht ovoleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Russian Vodka
    Posts
    8,343
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help with physics problem? THanks! :)

    IF anyone can help with this physics problem, I will owe you big time

    I tried this problem with someone else and they couldn't figure it out either.

    The answer is :.310m

    "A flowerpot falls off a windowsill and falls past the window below. You may ignore air resistance. It takes .420s to pass this window, which is 1.90 m high. How far is the top of the window below the windowsill from which the flowerpot fell?"

    I tried, x=x0+v0(t)+1/2(a)(t)^2. v=v0+at

    ...

    Its some simple problem which is a PITA. I have the answer I just can't find a way to get to it.

    THanks anyone

  2. #2
    Feral Member Nicodemus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Roma, Italia
    My Bikes
    yes, I have one.
    Posts
    2,664
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    x=x+vt+0.5at^2 should be used - but remember that the starting velocity of the journey for which the numbers are given is not 0. You need to calculate what that velocity was, and then use that to get your answer.

    journey1 = sill to top of window
    journey2 = top to bottom of window


    Journey 2
    x2=bottom of window
    x1=top of window
    v=velocity at top of window
    t=time to travel across window

    x2=x1 + vt + 0.5at^2 => you get v=2.4658

    (start velocity of journey 2 = final velocity of journey 1)...

    Journey 1:

    So now you can use this value of v to calculate the amount of time it took to get there: v=at => you get t=0.2516

    This is the amount of time in journey1. Now you can subtitute directly into the old favourite...

    x=0+0+0.5at^2 = 0.310

  3. #3
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,507
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's how I did it, you have to set up the problem into multiple parts first. Draw a picture and it makes sense. You're trying to solve it all in one equation and that's not possible because you have to solve for multiple variables, thus multiple equations are necessary. Here's a picture:

    The various equations are (assuming constant acceleration):

    1.
    average Velocity across window = dX/dT = 1.90m/0.420s = 4.524m/s


    2.
    average Velocity across window = (V1+V2)/2

    Solving for V1 we get (V1+V2)/2 = 4.524m/s
    V1 + V2 = 9.048m/s
    V1 = 9.048m/s - V2


    3.Then solving for acceleration across 1.90m we get:

    average Acceleration across window = dV/dT = (V2-V1)/0.420s
    V2 = V1 + at = V1 + (9.8m/s^2 * 0.420s) = V1 + 4.116m/s
    V2 = V1 + 4.116m/s

    Combining these last two equations we get:

    V1 = 9.048m/s - V2
    V2 = V1 + 4.116m/s
    ---------------------
    V1 = 9.048m/s - (V1+4.116m/s)
    V1 = 9.048m/s - V1 - 4.116m/s
    2V1 = 9.048m/s - 4.116m/s = 4.932m/s
    V1 = 2.466m/s is velocity at top of lower window.


    4. Pluging into V=at for velocity over constant acceleration we get:
    2.466m/s = 9.8m/s^2 * t
    t = 0.252s time to fall to top of lower window


    5. Pluging into d=1/2at^2 for distance over time w/constant acceleration we get:
    d = 0.5at^2 = 0.5 * 9.8m/s^2 * 0.252s^2

    d = 0.310m (don't round off numbers until final step)
    Last edited by DannoXYZ; 09-26-05 at 06:33 PM.

  4. #4
    CRIKEY!!!!!!! Cyclaholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,270
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ....depends on what species of plant it is

  5. #5
    Powered by Borscht ovoleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Russian Vodka
    Posts
    8,343
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    omg thanks so much guys!!! I think I put in 2hrs trying to solve this. I wasted the first hour because I misread the question, I thought the total distance traveled took .42s.

    Thanks guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. #6
    NEVER WALK A HILL cycleprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Volpe Specialized Dolce Vita Multi Sport
    Posts
    1,184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why did I even open this thread...it is soooo over my head. I think a flowerpot landed on my head in college...or maybe it was what I was smokin that was IN the flowerpot!
    Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go.

    T. S. Elliot

  7. #7
    Powered by Borscht ovoleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    Russian Vodka
    Posts
    8,343
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After I got the right problem down, I was thinking with the same sense as Danno but I didn't set up the right equations. Thanks so much, I actually got to a point where I thought the answer was 1.03 and thought the teacher typo'ed and meant 1.03 instead of .310 because .31 is only the significant figure and to write .310 doesn't make any sense.

    Thanks again!

  8. #8
    CRIKEY!!!!!!! Cyclaholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,270
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This can all be avoided if you stick with ground floor appartments.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •