Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    more ape than man timmhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    8,093
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    step toward quantum computing - slowing down light

    if you're interested in things like this, check out the article. it's pretty amazing.

    "Physicists in Australia have slowed a speeding laser pulse and captured it in a crystal, a feat that could be instrumental in creating quantum computers."

    http://wired.com/news/technology/0,1...w=wn_tophead_1

  2. #2
    No Rocket Surgeon eubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Corona and S. El Monte, CA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
    Posts
    1,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Great.

    As if traffic on LA wasn't slow enough, the Australians have figured out how to slow light down.

    So, if the speed of light is constant under all conditions, does this mean time inside the crystal has to slow down too (based on our frame of reference)?

    We have the speed of light, c in m/s. This is constant under all conditions within the frame of reference.

    But now we have a new speed of light, v which is less than c.

    The length of the crystal, L, is assumed to be constant.

    And we have a new time for the light to pass through the crystal, t.

    So v = L/t

    but v < c from our frame of reference.

    Therefore time must slow down relative to our frame of reference, because from a frame of reference within the crystal v = c.

    Cool. My quantum computer will last longer.

  3. #3
    On my TARDIScycle! KingTermite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
    My Bikes
    Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE
    Posts
    3,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eubi
    So, if the speed of light is constant under all conditions, does this mean time inside the crystal has to slow down too (based on our frame of reference)?
    That's something that was assumed.....IIRC there have been a number of theories (maybe its even been proven) in the last 10 years or so that the speed of light is not constant.
    Quote Originally Posted by coffeecake View Post
    - it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.

  4. #4
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eubi
    ...So, if the speed of light is constant under all conditions, does this mean time inside the crystal has to slow down too (based on our frame of reference)?...
    Uh nope. The speed of light varies based upon the medium it's passing through. In an absolute vacuum it has maximum speed. But when it hits the atmosphere it goes slower. It also goes slower through water as well. It goes at different speeds in different types of glass. That's how diffraction in lenses work...

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The Alta Loma area of Rancho Cucamonga. About 45 miles east of Los Angeles, California. Uphill, downhill and across hill riding; not too level!
    Posts
    1,329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
    Uh nope. The speed of light varies based upon the medium it's passing through. In an absolute vacuum it has maximum speed. But when it hits the atmosphere it goes slower. It also goes slower through water as well. It goes at different speeds in different types of glass. That's how diffraction in lenses work...
    Doesn't it mean that the speed of light is not any slower in various mediums, but that it just takes longer to get where it is going?
    I . . can . . . doooo . . . it

  6. #6
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by foehn
    Doesn't it mean that the speed of light is not any slower in various mediums, but that it just takes longer to get where it is going?
    If you've got a 10cm piece of vacuum, a 10cm piece of air, a 10cm piece of water, a 10cm piece of glass placed next to each other, and you send a wide beam of light through all of them at once. The time it takes the light to traverse the samples and come out on the back sides will be different. In all cases, the light has traveled the same 10cm through different materials. The different amounts of time it takes to travel the same distance can be plugged into this equation:

    V = d/t

    If V is different for each sample, what does that indicate? Velocity or speed is covering a certain distance in a certain amount of time. If you cover the same distance in different times, that's different velocities right?

    This discussion reminds of the speed of free-falling objects. Sure on an academic school-book sense, we're taught that ALL objects fall at the same rate, 9.8m/s/s acceleration. However, in real life, there are other variables such as surface-area and wind-resistance that needs to be accounted for. Anyone who've ever dropped a bowling ball on their feet can probably tell you that it certainly falls faster than a feather or leaf.

    Same issue with speed-of-light. Those with textbook knowledge will not have experience with real-world applications. Any telecommunications engineer will tell you that speed-of-light through fibre-optics is about 0.6c, or 0.6 times the speed of light in a vacuum.

    The effect that's happening to the photons in the beam is that they are absorbed and re-emitted by the material with a certain frequency based upon their wavelength. There appears to be a delay between the absorption and emission of the photos along the way. Here a table of the refractive index (N) of various materials:

    Air 1.0003
    Water 1.33
    Glycerin 1.47
    Immersion Oil 1.515
    Glass 1.52
    Flint 1.66
    Zircon 1.92
    Diamond 2.42
    Lead Sulfide 3.91

    where N = c/V ; with c = native unimpeded speed of light and V = actual speed through material.

    An interesting phenomenon is Cherenkov radiation where particles exist that will actually move through various materials faster than the speed of light.
    Last edited by DannoXYZ; 10-05-05 at 01:27 AM.

  7. #7
    Devilmaycare Cycling Fool Allister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Wynnum, Australia
    My Bikes
    1998 Cannondale F700
    Posts
    3,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I only hope that when quantum computers come out, they have pentagonal keyboards.
    If we learn from our mistakes, I must be a goddamn genius.

  8. #8
    .
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    .
    My Bikes
    .
    Posts
    3,094
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Diamond slows light way down, something like 40-odd percent.

  9. #9
    No Rocket Surgeon eubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Corona and S. El Monte, CA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
    Posts
    1,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
    Uh nope. The speed of light varies based upon the medium it's passing through. In an absolute vacuum it has maximum speed. But when it hits the atmosphere it goes slower. It also goes slower through water as well. It goes at different speeds in different types of glass. That's how diffraction in lenses work...
    Hahaha.

    Let me adjust my glasses so I can see better. You are absolutely correct about the lenses. I do enjoy your technical posts. You know what you are talking about.

    Of course, my tongue was firmly in cheek when I wrote this.

    The slowing down of light in that crystal was extreme: 300,000 km/sec to about 700 m/s? Wow. That's only about .00023% of its normal speed!

    As a side - and off topic - note, how do I post quotes from multiple posters? For instance, If I wanted to include quotes from King Termite AND DannoXYZ in my post how do I do that? I've tried to figure it out and nothing works. Thanks!
    Last edited by eubi; 10-05-05 at 09:40 AM.

  10. #10
    Non Tribuo Anus Rodentum and off to the next adventure (RIP) Stacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    9,163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I usually have a second browser tab open and do the old c&p, framing things with the [ quote = whoever ] C&P here [ / quote ] tags. Just take out the spaces so the code will work properly.

  11. #11
    Feral Member Nicodemus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Roma, Italia
    My Bikes
    yes, I have one.
    Posts
    2,645
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by eubi
    As a side - and off topic - note, how do I post quotes from multiple posters? For instance, If I wanted to include quotes from King Termite AND DannoXYZ in my post how do I do that? I've tried to figure it out and nothing works. Thanks!
    I just use Reply w/ Post, copy the text, go back and reply to another post, and past the copied text back in. Quite simple, really.

    Or you could just type the other's post, but there's a greater risk of misquoting them...
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicodemus, Master of the Pan Flutes
    I didn't say this!
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    Did you just say "minarchist?" I'm going to start a 10-page vaginathon because only Libertarians can define Libertarianism. Also, you're mean.

  12. #12
    No Rocket Surgeon eubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Corona and S. El Monte, CA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
    Posts
    1,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stacey
    I usually have a second browser tab open and do the old c&p, framing things with the [ quote = whoever ] C&P here [ / quote ] tags. Just take out the spaces so the code will work properly.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicodemus
    I just use Reply w/ Post, copy the text, go back and reply to another post, and past the copied text back in. Quite simple, really.

    Or you could just type the other's post, but there's a greater risk of misquoting them...

    OK, thanks!

  13. #13
    That darn Yankee TexasGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West West Fort Worth
    My Bikes
    Mongoose XR-100, Eros Bianchi
    Posts
    4,286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The japanese and russians and Israelis have been doing crap with light for almost 3 decades now. Despite all the technological "advances" nothing that can be more then perceived as being fruitful has really yet to come of either and I severely doubt that anything will come close to this. It would be intreresting to see if computers that were built solely with light would advance from a bit being on or a bit being off since light can have numerous colors. Could a computer operate at 255- 16million bits in a single instance.
    Life is about hanging onto what you think is important and finding out what really is important.
    "Stop Ruining my joke!", "No, a joke implies humor attached at no additional cost"
    So many sayings, so little sig space.

  14. #14
    On my TARDIScycle! KingTermite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
    My Bikes
    Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE
    Posts
    3,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasGuy
    It would be intreresting to see if computers that were built solely with light would advance from a bit being on or a bit being off since light can have numerous colors. Could a computer operate at 255- 16million bits in a single instance.
    Not sure that would do much either...they have been building "Analog Computers" for years as well, and have never offered enough of a benefit to go mainstream with them. Same idea as what you are saying...using as precise a voltage level as you wish to instrument to in order to have many different "states" (other than just 0 or 1).
    Quote Originally Posted by coffeecake View Post
    - it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.

  15. #15
    That darn Yankee TexasGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    West West Fort Worth
    My Bikes
    Mongoose XR-100, Eros Bianchi
    Posts
    4,286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KingTermite
    Not sure that would do much either...they have been building "Analog Computers" for years as well, and have never offered enough of a benefit to go mainstream with them. Same idea as what you are saying...using as precise a voltage level as you wish to instrument to in order to have many different "states" (other than just 0 or 1).
    Well thanks for spoilin it for everybody else
    Life is about hanging onto what you think is important and finding out what really is important.
    "Stop Ruining my joke!", "No, a joke implies humor attached at no additional cost"
    So many sayings, so little sig space.

  16. #16
    On my TARDIScycle! KingTermite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
    My Bikes
    Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE
    Posts
    3,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasGuy
    Well thanks for spoilin it for everybody else
    Sorry...ya forgot to give me the "heads up" this time.

    But...the idea of having a rainbow in the coputer is kinda cool...maybe you could have a virtual leprechaun at the end.
    Quote Originally Posted by coffeecake View Post
    - it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •