Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Foo Off-Topic chit chat with no general subject.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-28-07, 08:13 AM   #1
Falkon
The quieter you become...
Thread Starter
 
Falkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Superbe, 2006 Trek 4300 with no original parts, 1984 Ciocc, Custom Keith Anderson
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bike Computer Idea

Okay, here's my idea. You know how your bike computer only registers speed with a certain delay, because the magnet has to pass the sensor? I'm thinking about putting on another magnet and changing the wheel size in the computer to make it register faster. It'll also balance the wheel a little more if it matters.

The way the computer calculates the speed is using the circumference, so if I double the value in the computer, it should work, right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN
San Jose has to be the most boring place I've ever been. And I live in Ohio.
Falkon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 08:19 AM   #2
Tude 
Blasted Weeds
 
Tude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Trek 1200C, Specialized Rockhopper, Giant Yukon FX, Giant Acapulco
Posts: 1,182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Crikeys! I'm all wrapped up in avoiding potholes and cars versus speed
Tude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 08:26 AM   #3
Falkon
The quieter you become...
Thread Starter
 
Falkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Superbe, 2006 Trek 4300 with no original parts, 1984 Ciocc, Custom Keith Anderson
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
eh, I use it on group rides, because I've been told more than once that when I start pulling the group that I ramp up the pace. Last time, I dropped part of the group.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN
San Jose has to be the most boring place I've ever been. And I live in Ohio.
Falkon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 08:29 AM   #4
Tude 
Blasted Weeds
 
Tude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Trek 1200C, Specialized Rockhopper, Giant Yukon FX, Giant Acapulco
Posts: 1,182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkon View Post
eh, I use it on group rides, because I've been told more than once that when I start pulling the group that I ramp up the pace. Last time, I dropped part of the group.
Yeah, for the group rides - the roadie comes out and I find myself analyzing the computer more - specially cadence.
Tude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 08:32 AM   #5
jsharr
You Know!? For Kids!
 
jsharr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Just NW of Richardson Bike Mart
Bikes: '05 Trek 1200 / '90 Trek 8000 / '? Falcon Europa
Posts: 6,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkon View Post
Okay, here's my idea. You know how your bike computer only registers speed with a certain delay, because the magnet has to pass the sensor? I'm thinking about putting on another magnet and changing the wheel size in the computer to make it register faster. It'll also balance the wheel a little more if it matters.

The way the computer calculates the speed is using the circumference, so if I double the value in the computer, it should work, right?
it seems it would be critical to get the magnets equidistant from each other.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colorider View Post
Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.
jsharr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 05:46 PM   #6
Falkon
The quieter you become...
Thread Starter
 
Falkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Superbe, 2006 Trek 4300 with no original parts, 1984 Ciocc, Custom Keith Anderson
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
it seems it would be critical to get the magnets equidistant from each other.
That is not a problem. I can get them directly opposite. I think I was wrong also. I think I would actually half the circumference that was entered into the computer.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN
San Jose has to be the most boring place I've ever been. And I live in Ohio.
Falkon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 07:08 PM   #7
jsharr
You Know!? For Kids!
 
jsharr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Just NW of Richardson Bike Mart
Bikes: '05 Trek 1200 / '90 Trek 8000 / '? Falcon Europa
Posts: 6,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
two magnets = double circumference or leave it like it is and just divide the end result from your computer by 2.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colorider View Post
Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.
jsharr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 07:40 PM   #8
markhr
POWERCRANK addict
 
markhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Acton, West London, UK
Bikes:
Posts: 3,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't, unless I'm mistaken, avocet do that already with their transmitter?

__________________
shameless POWERCRANK plug
Recommended reading for all cyclists - Cyclecraft - Effective Cycling
Condor Cycles - quite possibly the best bike shop in London
Don't run red lights, wear a helmet, use hand signals, get some cycle lights(front and rear) and, FFS, don't run red lights!
markhr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 10:55 PM   #9
Falkon
The quieter you become...
Thread Starter
 
Falkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Superbe, 2006 Trek 4300 with no original parts, 1984 Ciocc, Custom Keith Anderson
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Eh, this is easier. I forgot about the avocet one. their's is a little more unsightly though.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN
San Jose has to be the most boring place I've ever been. And I live in Ohio.
Falkon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-07, 11:38 PM   #10
nomad.dc
Wooo!
 
nomad.dc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My cheap little computer's display has a set update frequency. I dunno how nicer ones work, but I'd be suspicious that the computer might change your displayed speed at exactly the same time intervals regardless of how often it counts a rotation.
nomad.dc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 02:35 AM   #11
tspoon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stratford, New Zealand
Bikes: 1990 Paul Dye Hand Built 7 Speed, 1965 Raleigh Sport, Folding 26" Tourer
Posts: 193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
it seems it would be critical to get the magnets equidistant from each other.
Probably not particularly critical. There'll still be two pulses per revolution. Also you'll need to halve the value in the bike computer, not double it.
If anything, having two pulses per revolution will more likely lessen the measuring resolution of the computer, than improve it. In reality though, it's neither here nor there.
tspoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 02:36 PM   #12
dragracer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 620
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
it seems it would be critical to get the magnets equidistant from each other.
I don't think it would really matter would it. It would basically be like two short wheel revolutions. If it were off a bit, one revolution would be bit longer and the other a bit shorter. Would sorta offset each other. For each COMPLETE wheel revolution(two magnet passes) it would be exactly the same(if you had the computer setup correctly) as if you just had one magnet. Wouldn't it?
dragracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 02:59 PM   #13
Falkon
The quieter you become...
Thread Starter
 
Falkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Superbe, 2006 Trek 4300 with no original parts, 1984 Ciocc, Custom Keith Anderson
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can get them exactly apart. I just wonder if it would make the computer faster. I need to go to the shop tomorrow and get another to find out.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN
San Jose has to be the most boring place I've ever been. And I live in Ohio.
Falkon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 03:37 PM   #14
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How about a magnet on each spoke and post the picture of what the display reads on a downhill?

Example: 36 spoke wheel = speed X36!

37 MPH*36=1332MPH. I'd love to find out how whether a bike computer could discriminate individual pulses coming that fast!
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 05:08 PM   #15
Mr. Gear Jammer
Senior Member
 
Mr. Gear Jammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkon View Post
Okay, here's my idea. You know how your bike computer only registers speed with a certain delay, because the magnet has to pass the sensor? I'm thinking about putting on another magnet and changing the wheel size in the computer to make it register faster. It'll also balance the wheel a little more if it matters.

The way the computer calculates the speed is using the circumference, so if I double the value in the computer, it should work, right?
I think this is a great idea.
Mr. Gear Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-07, 08:25 PM   #16
Falkon
The quieter you become...
Thread Starter
 
Falkon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Superbe, 2006 Trek 4300 with no original parts, 1984 Ciocc, Custom Keith Anderson
Posts: 1,283
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Okay, instead of adding an extra magnet, I'll buy a $250 Garmin Edge. Nah, I'll stick with my idea. I need to go to the shop tomorrow to get another magnet for this experiment. It would be great if it registered speed faster.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechKnowGN
San Jose has to be the most boring place I've ever been. And I live in Ohio.
Falkon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 AM.