Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Immoderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Dumb Laptop + Vista question

    By chance, does anyone know on a laptop if 4 gigs of RAM will run Vista decently? I hate to ask, but these are one of those questions that you get a different answer from different people. I assume foo is 100% trustworthy so asking here.

  2. #2
    Code Warrior mwrobe1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South suburbs of Chicago, Illinois
    My Bikes
    Schwinn MTB/Raleigh Marathon
    Posts
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nilrim1980 View Post
    I assume foo is 100% trustworthy so asking here.
    It is.

    Don't install Vista. Stick with XP.

    Nuff said.
    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, 1/2 a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.

    Jake: Hit it.



  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sure it will. General rule is to have 2 GB RAM or more with Vista.

    If you can't get Vista to run well with 4GB RAM, then there are other things going on.

  4. #4
    Dances With Cars TRaffic Jammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
    Posts
    10,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    4 gigs is enough to run anything, however, Vista being so panned by Windows users publicly, you may wish to reconsider your choice of OS's

  5. #5
    Non Tribuo Anus Rodentum and off to the next adventure (RIP) Stacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    9,163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sure it should run. Can't guarantee it, after all it is Vista.

  6. #6
    Senior Member madfiNch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    My Bikes
    Burley Runabout 7 and Specialized Allez Elite
    Posts
    257
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got Vista on 2 machines and the each have 2 gigs of RAM.
    4 is plenty.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
    My Bikes
    '71 Raleigh Sports, '84 Schwinn LeTour on the trainer (and available for hill repeats), '06 Scott CR1 SL (Ksyrium SL), and a yet-to-be-determined TT bike.
    Posts
    1,643
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nilrim1980 View Post
    By chance, does anyone know on a laptop if 4 gigs of RAM will run Vista decently? I hate to ask, but these are one of those questions that you get a different answer from different people. I assume foo is 100% trustworthy so asking here.
    Two gigs is probably enough, but if you're ordering your computer, and have the option of four, go ahead and get it. What version of Vista? Home Basic or Home Premium? I heard that one has more problems than the other, though I don't remember which....

  8. #8
    Dances With Cars TRaffic Jammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
    Posts
    10,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wait for Vista to be a year old and "improved" by MS

  9. #9
    (((Fully Awake))) Serendipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ~Serenading with sensous soliloquies whilst singing supple sentences that are simultaneously suppling my sonnets with serenity serendipitously.~ -Serendipper
    My Bikes
    Guerciotti Pista-Giant Carbon-Bridgestone300- Batavus Type Champion Road Bike, Specialized Hardrock Commuter, On-One The Gimp (SS Rigid MTB/hit by a truck)- Raleigh Sports 3-speed,Gatsby Scorcher, comming soon...The Penny Farthing Highwheel!
    Posts
    5,598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Answer: Nothing will run Vista decently. Vista is a vulgar, nasty OS.
    __________________________________________________________________________________________________

    無上甚深微妙法 .... 百千萬劫難遭遇..... 我今見聞得受持

  10. #10
    Immoderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the answers. A number of people I know say that 8 gigs are minimum, 16 is best, and to run the 64 bit version so the machine can access the whole RAM range.

    I am not sure what version of Vista will come with the laptop, likely Home Premium.

    As for XP, the main reason I am not installing that is that I don't want to spend $300-$400 for a copy (the upgrade copy doesn't think Vista is an OS to upgrade from.) Of course, there are "other" ways to get XP, but I don't feel like having my laptop be a spam zombie and logging my keystrokes from the moment I reinstall it.

  11. #11
    Dances With Cars TRaffic Jammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
    Posts
    10,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It sounds like you are buying new. Just tell the folks you are buying this laptop from NOT to install Vista and to install XP.

  12. #12
    Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour ModoVincere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,676
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Honest answer: Vista does not run well with any amount of ram.

    so, I made up an answer...sue me.
    1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold

  13. #13
    ......... diggy488's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    My Bikes
    2012 C'dale Supersix
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    8gb minimum?? I don't know many motherboards on laptops that can even support that much! 2gb is sufficient for a little while, but after you begin installing/uninstalling programs and loading it with info, it will start to lag a little. But 4gb would keep you happy for a good while.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Adding a lot of memory to a system will help Vista run better as will the best non-integrated video card that is offered. However the core problem is Vista is so much slower than the same hardware running Windows XP. Even if you turn off all the fancy Aero graphical enhancements and have it looking like Windows 2000 but with more colorful icons, the operating system bogs. I don't care if it boots and shuts down faster than XP, I want it snappy while actually using the machine. I have the advantage at work of having co-workers with MSDN subscriptions so I can test all the versions of software from MS and at this point Vista really is like Windows ME part II. Two gigs of RAM is quite a bit for any laptop not running CAD CAM type apps.

    I'm not looking forward to supporting this years refresh of laptops for the sales staff. Dell latitudes with Vista and not XP.

  15. #15
    Cactuar! sneefy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    '04 Iron Horse Hollowpoint, '01 Giant Boulder with all non-original parts, '99 Trek 7500 (frame), Mid '90's? Wheeler MTB frame (anybody want it?), '96 Specialized Crossroads, '86 Schwinn Predator Qualifier, 1976 Viscount Aerospace Pro (no death fork)
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Getting 4 gigs only makes sense if you are getting the x64 version. the x86(32 bit) version cannot address all 4 gigs. Good luck with drivers.

    The people that say you need a minimum of 8 or 16 gigs are idiots and just sayng that for the 733tn3$$ factor. If it's a multi-CPU server, maybe. No workstation or gaming computer needs that much.

    However, it's already been mentioned, but should be mentioned again, do NOT go Vista. The only reason is if you want to use DirectX 10. And there is no reason to go DirectX 10.

    Stick with XP.

  16. #16
    Portland Fred banerjek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    My Bikes
    Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid
    Posts
    10,642
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sneefy View Post
    Getting 4 gigs only makes sense if you are getting the x64 version. the x86(32 bit) version cannot address all 4 gigs. Good luck with drivers.
    Sneefy is correct. 32 bit windows cannot address all 4 GB, so the extra RAM is a waste of money -- unless you go with a 64 bit operating system which has some issues you might not want to deal with as a home user.

    If you want everything to work as well as possible, XP is the way to go. My wife has vista with a dual core processor and 2GB on her machine. Performance is fine, but there are some compatibility issues. I really like some of the things about vista, but it has been oversold and you have to pay extra to get full functionality.

    To answer the original question, 4GB of memory will run fine on vista. However, it won't run noticeably better than 2GB so there's no point in paying for the extra memory. However, top tier laptops will come this year with 4GB standard even though it can't be used -- this is for marketing purposes and will only have the effect of driving up RAM and computer prices.

    If you're worried about speed, don't run so much crap on your system. Any machine can be slowed to a crawl if enough is running on it. Even weak machines can run surprisingly fast if you only run what you actually use and need.

  17. #17
    J E R S E Y S B E S T Jerseysbest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    1,852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think Windows XP will only support up to 3 GB. The 64 bit version of XP supports 8 GB.
    Quote Originally Posted by SingingSabre View Post
    Cheating: a symptom of the problem.

  18. #18
    Belt drive! vtjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Burlington, Vermont
    My Bikes
    2011 Trek Soho DLX
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We (wife & I) just ordered a Dell XPS M1530. Microsoft prohibits XP installation on the XPS systems. We'll see how it goes. 3GB RAM. 250GB drive. Vista Home Premium.

  19. #19
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,507
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by banerjek View Post
    Sneefy is correct. 32 bit windows cannot address all 4 GB, so the extra RAM is a waste of money -- unless you go with a 64 bit operating system which has some issues you might not want to deal with as a home user.
    The problem with 4gb is that you run in the same problem as the 640kb limit with DOS. The powers-that-be put the address ranges for PCI and other hardware devices at 4gb downward. Those addresses can't be used for RAM and programme usage. You've got hard-drive controllers, USB devices, and graphics-cards with their memory from 4gb downwards. The memory on the devices themselves are mapped into those address ranges and the RAM is not accessible. If you've got a 512mb graphics cards, the memory-ranges from 3.5gb-4gb will be looking at the memory on the graphics card itself and the RAM on the MB is wasted. Even larger memory on graphics-cards will displace even more RAM from the motherboard.

    Another problem is the Windows memory-allocation scheme itself. No programme can use more than 1.5gb, making Windows a poor DB-server.

    Stick with 2gb, you won't be able to measure ANY performance differences with more. Also:

    Wired Blog - Windows XP Service Pack 3 Trounces Vista In Speed Tests
    ComputerWorld - Windows XP SP3 boasts speed boost
    PC world - Early Tests Say SP3 Speeds Windows XP
    Yahoo News - Windows XP Speed Boost Coming with SP3
    Paul Thurrott's Supersite -
    Windows XP Service Pack 3 RC1 Overview and Screenshots
    - "Certainly, XP is faster than Vista on the same hardware, regardless of which service packs are installed. "
    Last edited by DannoXYZ; 01-10-08 at 03:14 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •