Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Foo Off-Topic chit chat with no general subject.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-08, 05:36 AM   #1
late
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,421
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1338 Post(s)
Gonna get one of those newfangled LCD monitors. No idea which one..

You know,
I have no idea what I am doing. I play games so I need a fairly fast one,
but the 2ms have 6 bit color, so I have doubts about them. I have an old 20 inch screen now, I am hesitant to get a 20 inch widescreen and lose that vertical space. They still make 20 inch screens that are not widescreen, I suppose I could get one of those.

A 22 inch widescreen would have a picture about as tall as on my 20 inch 4:3 monitor; but hardware gurus on another forum suggested I go with 20 or 24. They seemed to think 22 was an oddball size. I like the idea of 24 but I am worried my video card will have problems pushing that many pixels. I know my wallet will have trouble pushing that many dollars

So I am bewitched, bothered and bewildered....

Suggestions?

Last edited by late; 01-14-08 at 06:44 AM.
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 06:30 AM   #2
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Bikes: 2013 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict, 2015 Scott Scale 700SL MTB
Posts: 59,579
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 201 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by late View Post
You know,
I have no idea what I am doing. I play games so I need a fairly fast one,
but the 2ms have 6 bit color, so I have doubts about them. I have an old 20 inch screen now, I am hesitant to get a 20 inch widescreen and lose that vertical space. They still make 20 inch screens that are not widescreen, I suppose I could get one of those.

A 22 inch widescreen would have a picture about as tall as on my 20 inch 4:3 monitor; but hardware gurus on another forum suggested I go with 20 or 24. They seemed to think 22 was an oddball size. I like the idea of 24 but I am worried my video card will have problems pushing that many pixels. I kow my wallet will have trouble pushing that many dollars

So I am bewitched, bothered and bewildered..
..

Suggestions?
Change your name to Mr. Cutting Edge and snap a helmet mirror on the side of that new LCD monitor.
patentcad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 06:50 AM   #3
late
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,421
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1338 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patentcad View Post
Change your name to Mr. Cutting Edge
Three hundred bucks doesn't get you anywhere near cutting edge. Think 42 inch
wall mounted with dual 600 hundred (each) buck video cards. You can go further than that, but I might do damage to all those fuzzy feelings you have been having lately
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 08:35 AM   #4
cuda2k
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
Posts: 11,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Always hear great things about Samsung monitors and love the two I have now, View Sonic being a close second choice in my book. A lot of the guys at the office are running 22" wide screens and they look fine to me. I really don't see any need to go to the 2ms monitors, I've yet to detect any ghosting or artifacts on a 6ms.
cuda2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 08:43 AM   #5
tombailey
awaiting uci approval
 
tombailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix RC 06
Posts: 961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a 22" Samsung and love it (though it makes going back to my 15" standard monitor at work a bit weird). I've never had a 20 or 24 so can't say if 22 is strange, doesn't seem it to me. If you want model number etc I can probably dig it out.
tombailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 08:58 AM   #6
late
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,421
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1338 Post(s)
Thanks guys,
that is what I wanted to hear. I have been looking at a Samsung 22" on Newegg.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824001096
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 09:15 AM   #7
jsharr
You Know!? For Kids!
 
jsharr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Just NW of Richardson Bike Mart
Bikes: '05 Trek 1200 / '90 Trek 8000 / '? Falcon Europa
Posts: 6,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I love the ViewSonic my wife got me. I think it is a 19" widescreen, but it is sharp and seems fast, though I do not game. My son does a bit, but his games are online things from Hotwheels and the like, not anything graphics intense.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colorider View Post
Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.
jsharr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 09:31 AM   #8
late
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,421
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1338 Post(s)
Viewsonic Pro monitors used to be the hot ticket. That's what I have. The reviews I
am seeing on Newegg seem to be saying that Samsung has an edge over Viewsonic, at least in the retail market. The Westinghouse 24 inch LCD is very popular with gamers.
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 10:12 AM   #9
Psydotek
Body By Nintendo
 
Psydotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
Bikes: Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.
Posts: 3,187
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by late View Post
Thanks guys,
that is what I wanted to hear. I have been looking at a Samsung 22" on Newegg.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16824001096
Buy it. Use it. Love it. I <3 my 226BW.

I used a Samsung Syncmaster 172T before with 1280x1024 resolution and 25ms response time and the 226BW made for a perfect monitor upgrade for my new computer. I've been using the 226BW for about 4 months now. 1680x1050 is a great resolution for everything i've thrown at it including gaming (though you'll need a decent videocard to run most newer games in that resolution). The monitor response time is as fast as you can get these days on an LCD and the monitor is so bright that i have it turned down to 15/100 (which means there's plenty of room to turn it back up as the monitor ages and fades).

There were some "issues" with the 226BW when it was initially released (some debacle over some monitors that used panels made by another non-Samsung facility which were still good but not as good as the panels produced by Samsung themselves) but those have been resolved with the latest crop of monitors from what i can tell.

I was considering a 24" monitor but my desk space at home (or lack of) made it unfeasible... The 226BW just bearly fits.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
A girl once asked me to give her twelve inches and make it hurt. I had to make love to her 3 times and then punch her in the nose.
Psydotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 11:30 AM   #10
late
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,421
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1338 Post(s)
Cool.
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 11:33 AM   #11
x136 
phony collective progress
 
x136's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Hoosey
Bikes: http://velospace.org/user/36663
Posts: 2,981
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My previous monitor was a Samsung LCD. It was a great little thing. Currently using an Apple Cinema Display. An even greater (not so little) thing.

On the other hand, the Dell I'm using here at work is an awful piece of junk. But hey, it's a Dell, that's to be expected.
__________________
x136 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 12:47 PM   #12
Jerseysbest
J E R S E Y S B E S T
 
Jerseysbest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DC
Bikes:
Posts: 1,849
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Currently using a 28" View Sonic at work... Oh so nice, but probably out of the typical price range, but not by far.
Jerseysbest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 01:02 PM   #13
Bostic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
I also have the 22" Samsung widescreen monitor. It's fantastic for my gaming needs. I play a lot of Halo 1 and 3 on the xbox 360 using the vga connector and am very picky about the refresh rate speed. It's about the same speed as my 9" Sony color tv which is very fast. I actually started with the 23" lcd tv that was used in the 360 kiosks but the refresh rate is dreadful so I exchanged it.
Bostic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 01:49 PM   #14
deraltekluge
Senior Member
 
deraltekluge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes: Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX
Posts: 1,195
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a 22" Acer (AL2223W) wide-screen monitor that I'm happy with...except that I kinda wish I'd bought a 26". I don't do games, so I can't vouch for its performance in that respect.

Don't consider just the over-all size, but think of the pixel count, too, and the pixels per inch. I used to have a 19" CRT that was in the neighborhood of 70 pixels/inch (at 1024 x 768), and the 22" LCD is about 90 pixels/inch (at 1680 x 1050...and that's the only resolution at which it looks good). A 26" LCD would be in between (at 1920 x 1200). Everything is somewhat smaller on the LCD than it was on the CRT, but I get more stuff on the screen at a time.

My video card didn't have 1680 x 1050 as one of its standard settings, but it accepted it as a custom setting and works fine.
deraltekluge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 01:57 PM   #15
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Buy.com has a great deal on Viewsonic 24" LCD monitor for $359 with Google check-out.

Dell also has a $80 rebate on their 22" widescreen LCD for $239.

Staples has $60 rebate on NEC LCD22WV-BK 22" Widescreen LCD Monitor for $190.

Last edited by DannoXYZ; 01-14-08 at 02:04 PM.
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 03:32 PM   #16
KingTermite 
On my TARDIScycle!
 
KingTermite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
Bikes: Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE
Posts: 3,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
How about this sweetie....due out later this year.

http://gizmodo.com/341413/alienware-...another-planet
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/07/a...at-2880-x-900/
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by coffeecake View Post
- it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.
KingTermite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 03:40 PM   #17
x136 
phony collective progress
 
x136's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Hoosey
Bikes: http://velospace.org/user/36663
Posts: 2,981
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingTermite View Post
Wow, for as much as that thing is going to cost, it only has 900px of vertical resolution, and you can still see the division between the panels [edit: Supposedly this is going to be fixed.]? I'll wait for v2.
__________________
x136 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 03:44 PM   #18
KingTermite 
On my TARDIScycle!
 
KingTermite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
Bikes: Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE
Posts: 3,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by x136 View Post
Wow, for as much as that thing is going to cost, it only has 900px of vertical resolution, and you can still see the division between the panels [edit: Supposedly this is going to be fixed.]? I'll wait for v2.
LOL....I was thinking the same thing when I looked at it. I didn't read the article...only watched the vid.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by coffeecake View Post
- it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.
KingTermite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-08, 08:25 PM   #19
catatonic
Chairman of the Bored
 
catatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)
Posts: 5,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by late View Post
You know,
I have no idea what I am doing. I play games so I need a fairly fast one,
but the 2ms have 6 bit color, so I have doubts about them. I have an old 20 inch screen now, I am hesitant to get a 20 inch widescreen and lose that vertical space. They still make 20 inch screens that are not widescreen, I suppose I could get one of those.

A 22 inch widescreen would have a picture about as tall as on my 20 inch 4:3 monitor; but hardware gurus on another forum suggested I go with 20 or 24. They seemed to think 22 was an oddball size. I like the idea of 24 but I am worried my video card will have problems pushing that many pixels. I know my wallet will have trouble pushing that many dollars

So I am bewitched, bothered and bewildered....

Suggestions?
Viewsonic has some 22" widescren displays (DVI input) for a fair price. I have the VX2235wm and am more than happy with it. Good color saturation and fast response time. If you don't know what a DVI is, it's a very wide white connector that should be on your video card (if yours does not, get one that does). It should look like this:

catatonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 AM.