Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Dolce far niente bigbossman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    10,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Converting 35mm slides to digital

    I've got a ton of slides from the olden days, when I did a lot of photography. I've been wanting to convert some of them to digital, and today I stumbled onto this little gadget:

    http://www.hammacher.com/publish/74083.asp

    I'm thinking of ordering it, but am wondering if anyone has experience with this or perhaps another, better device. Most of the scanned images would be for computer display and perhaps 4x6 or 5x7 printing, but I have 3 that I would like to print out to 16x20 if possible (these 3 are Kodachrome 25 transparencies, and were satisfactorily printed out at that size many years ago). I'm wondering if the stated output of 1800 dpi is sufficient, or if I should just send them off to a lab for professional scanning.

    Any thoughts, suggestions, or experience to share?
    "Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, its the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

    S. J. Perelman

  2. #2
    phony collective progress x136's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    San Hoosey
    My Bikes
    http://velospace.org/user/36663
    Posts
    2,958
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Film and slide scanners are generally a lot more expensive than that, or at least they were the last time I looked. I'd be wary of one that goes for a hundred bucks. That said, it's unlikely to actually harm the slides, so it may be worth a shot. You can always scan them again later.

    1800dpi may sound like a lot, but keep in mind that a slide is only a bit over an inch in size, so you're talking a finished image of maybe 2000 pixels across.

    You might try to find a camera store that will either rent you a professional-level scanner, or will do the scanning for you.

  3. #3
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nah, not good enough. The 1800dpi resolution will give you a 1800x2700 pixel image from a 35mm slide. That's good for a 4x5" to 5x7" print, no more. To get 16x20", you'll want 4800x6000 output or about 4800dpi. Even just as important as resolution is the dynamic-range (dmax) that a scanner can resolve. Look for something with at least a 4.0-dmax. Dust becomes a major issue on slides. One really nifty feature to deal with it is digital-ICE. Some scanners do a pass using infrared that catches the dust-specs. This is then used as a mask to filter out the dust on the optical scan.

    Check these out for a real slide-scanner: Microtek ArtixScan M1 or a Minolta Elite 5400 II. I do a lot of archiving for a local historic society. These will suffice for most 35mm prints. However, when there's fine-grain slides that need all the detail possible, we'll send it out for 10000dpi drum-scans (500mb each! ).
    Last edited by DannoXYZ; 01-24-08 at 06:16 PM.

  4. #4
    Dolce far niente bigbossman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern CA
    Posts
    10,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks, guys. I thought it might be too good to be true.

    Most of my slide stuff is either Kodachrome 25 or 64, with a smattering of Ektachrome here and there. I've also got a ton of b&w negatives from my "artistic" college days. I had hoped to do those myself.

    There are several labs that will do high resolution scans of slides, so I guess I'll send a couple off as a test, and see what comes back. I appreciate the advice and insight.
    Last edited by bigbossman; 01-24-08 at 06:28 PM.
    "Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, its the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

    S. J. Perelman

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    My Bikes
    Trek 2300, Cannondale ??, Univega Hyrid
    Posts
    100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    have not used them, but a pop phote guy reviewed it and liked the service. ymmv

    http://www.popphoto.com/popularphoto...cent-scan.html
    sigless at the moment....

  6. #6
    Mmmmm Donuts! FatguyRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Crownsville, MD
    My Bikes
    1998 IF Crown Jewel
    Posts
    2,069
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go with the lab. The stuff they use is much better than anything you'll end up buying. I had a Nikon Coolscan 4000ed a couple years ago and never really did scan enough to get my money back, so i sold it. Mine was an individual feed model, so i can even begin to tell you how tedious a chore it is to scan a batch of slides. The lab will seem expensive at first until you realize the savings you reap from not having to invest in the equipment or the time it takes to scan slides.

    Not only do you need high end equipment, you need a pretty powerful computer too. The full rez uncompressed 16bit .tif file sizes easily approach 36 megs apiece.
    John

    '09 Cannondale CAAD9 - Team Latitude/ABRT Special.
    '04 Lemond Victorie Ti
    '98 IF Crown Jewel (dead)
    '92 Trek2100 (TT)
    '50 something Gino Bartali (fixer)
    '02 Ducati ST4s (Moto-Ref mount)

    My Blog

  7. #7
    Footballus vita est iamlucky13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
    Posts
    2,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DannoXYZ View Post
    Nah, not good enough. The 1800dpi resolution will give you a 1800x2700 pixel image from a 35mm slide. That's good for a 4x5" to 5x7" print, no more. To get 16x20", you'll want 4800x6000 output or about 4800dpi.
    I don't entirely agree with the first part here. 1800x2700 is enough for a 300 dpi print up to 6x9. You can go up to 18x27 at 100 dpi, which still looks fine from reading distance.

    However, I agree about the dynamic range. You want to keep those colors looking good. If the cost of a really good scanner starts looking prohibitive, call up the local photography shop and see what they charge per slide. Generally they have pretty good equipment.
    "The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad

  8. #8
    Mmmmm Donuts! FatguyRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Crownsville, MD
    My Bikes
    1998 IF Crown Jewel
    Posts
    2,069
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dynamic Range is everything. I had a Pacific Imaging consumer model scanner that only did the 1800x2700 scans. They were ok for snap shots and gen photography, but i was doing astrophotography and needed soo much more. The Nikon just blew it away. To give you an idea of why its important take a look at the before and after. The first is an unprocessed raw image. Its a 20 min exposure on Kodak E200 (the gold standard for film based astrophotograhy and no longer available) using an Olympus OM2n with a Zuiko 135mm lens at f4 piggybacked on my telecscope on a guided Losmandy G11 mount. Below is is the same image after processing in Photoshop. If i recall what i did, i stacked (2) 20 min exposures, aligned and registered with a program called Registar and then worked the magic in PS. Without a good dynamic range bringing out the dark backgound and leaving the bright starts and nebulosity would be very hard. Stacking images doenst hurt either as it increases signal to noise ratio. The finished image is 25% of orginal size.





    You can view the full size image here. Its 15mb so be patient.
    Last edited by FatguyRacer; 01-25-08 at 08:38 AM.
    John

    '09 Cannondale CAAD9 - Team Latitude/ABRT Special.
    '04 Lemond Victorie Ti
    '98 IF Crown Jewel (dead)
    '92 Trek2100 (TT)
    '50 something Gino Bartali (fixer)
    '02 Ducati ST4s (Moto-Ref mount)

    My Blog

  9. #9
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,007
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Sweet, I have a new background now
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •