Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Foo Off-Topic chit chat with no general subject.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-05-08, 11:10 PM   #1
permanentjaun
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
permanentjaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Camera geeks, tell me what camera to get

I'm an amateur looking to step up from a point and shoot to a digital SLR. I'm looking to spend $500-$600 total on the camera and lens. Automated functions are always good, but it'd be nice to have manual settings to play with for more artistic shots. How many pixels do I really need? I want 10mp simply because that seems to be the # for the top amateur SLR's and also because it's a round number.

Feel free to convince me I don't need 10mp although I do enjoy editing images. I have moderate photoshop experience, but will most likely be using a less powerful machine and will have to resort to either gimp or paint.net freeware for any editing.

What do I get? Does brand matter? I'd like to be able to buy additional lenses for my camera. Perhaps get a less mp camera to be able to purchase an addition lens?

Thanks for any help,
Matt
permanentjaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-08, 11:14 PM   #2
skiahh
Senior Member
 
skiahh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CO Springs, CO
Bikes: 08 Stumpjumper FSR Expert, 02 Litespeed Tuscany, 04 Specialized S-Works Epic
Posts: 1,035
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think most top "amateur" SLRs are at 12.1 now... or better.
skiahh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-08, 11:27 PM   #3
permanentjaun
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
permanentjaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In the $500-$600 range?
permanentjaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:01 AM   #4
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Nonsense...

Use the link in this thread to get $200 off your ebay purchase.

Make your way here and get a 20D for $450

Take that extra money and buy one of these and/or one of these and be on your way to digital SLR heaven.
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:02 AM   #5
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh and by the way, yes brand matters.

Get yourself a Nikon or a Canon. Either one will do. Some may try to tell you that other companies are producing good stuff again. This is only a half truth. You can't get accessories for them like you can for nikon or canon. The used market for quality photo equipment is great. This camera will not make you a better photographer, in the same sense that pcad is still slow with his zipps but not as slow as with out them...
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:11 AM   #6
iamlucky13
Footballus vita est
 
iamlucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
Posts: 2,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by permanentjaun View Post
Feel free to convince me I don't need 10mp although I do enjoy editing images.

...snip...

What do I get? Does brand matter? I'd like to be able to buy additional lenses for my camera. Perhaps get a less mp camera to be able to purchase an addition lens?
You don't need 10MP although you do enjoy editing images. There, I said it.

Online sharing is typically less than 1 MP. Even a 20" widescreen is only 1.7 MP, and for printing, 10MP only allows you to go 30% larger than 6MP. Printing quality at 6 MP is excellent for an 8x10, and generally acceptable as large as 20x30. Pretty minor benefits for needlessly limiting your camera selection.

Here's a few more pointers:

http://www.digital-slr-guide.com/bes...gital-slr.html
__________________
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
iamlucky13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 12:16 AM   #7
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamlucky13 View Post
You don't need 10MP although you do enjoy editing images. There, I said it.

Online sharing is typically less than 1 MP. Even a 20" widescreen is only 1.7 MP, and for printing, 10MP only allows you to go 30% larger than 6MP. Printing quality at 6 MP is excellent for an 8x10, and generally acceptable as large as 20x30. Pretty minor benefits for needlessly limiting your camera selection.

Here's a few more pointers:

http://www.digital-slr-guide.com/bes...gital-slr.html
I can print 20x30 with my "measly" 4mp 1D. There is more to it than shear sensor size. 8mp is enough...i promise.
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 05:22 AM   #8
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Bikes:
Posts: 3,710
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
All the entry level DSLR's are good camera's. There isn't a bad one amongst them.

6MP is plenty. A 6 MP sensor produces an uncompressed tif file of 18MP in raw format to put it in perspective. Now having said that most entry level sensors are going to 10MP anyway which is HUGE. You most certainly don't need more than that.

I like the Pentax DSLR's. Vibration reduction on the body is a great feature as is weather proofing. Package a Pentax DSLR with the Pentax 16-45 F4 ED lens from the start and you have a GREAT camera.

Here's a web link devoted to the 16-45 F4 ED lens, http://www.pbase.com/cameras/pentax/..._16-45_4_ed_al

EDIT: Ohh, with that page if you refesh it you get new images. There are thousands of images to browse. I'm a firm believer that a camera body is simply a tool to fit a lens to although in the digital age things are a little different. With digital you are effectively buying the film you will use for the life of the camera as well. The Pentax 16-45 F4 ED is a ******* of a standard lens at a great price.

Anthony

Last edited by AnthonyG; 10-06-08 at 05:30 AM.
AnthonyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 05:53 AM   #9
Sangetsu
Senior Member
 
Sangetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 東京都
Bikes:
Posts: 560
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed in GA View Post
Canon and Nikon make good equipment.

But, there are other brands available that are worth your consideration.

Don't overlook Pentax, Sony, Fuji and others.
No, there are no other brands worth consideration. That may sound snobbish, but it's effectively true. People may use other brands, but for photographers, there are really only 2 brands, Nikon and Canon.

Personally, I like Nikon equipment, I've been using it for 20 years, and I have no complaints. Canon also makes good equipment, but I would only rate their top level cameras as "excellent".

I began photography as a hobby, and became more seriously involved with it over the years. I've upgraded from old manual focus film cameras to the new DSLRs, but much of my old gear is interchangeable with the newer cameras. I have a collection of 20 odd lenses, and most of them are old (and expensive) manual focus models. It's nice that the old lenses work on my new camera, with the exception of an old 6mm fisheye lens.

You don't need 10 megapixels. Good quality 35mm film is equal in resolution to 4 megapixels, and 35 mm film is good enough to project the giant images at your local movie theater, need I say more?

For under $600 you can get a new Nikon D40 kit with a good quality lens. Now that the new D90 is out, the D80 will probably fall in price significantly, though it might be tough to find one for $600 at the moment. You should look on Ebay for a low mileage D70s. It has all the necessary features, it's durable, has a decent LCD display on the back, and they can be had for cheap. You might even have enough money left over for a second lens.
Sangetsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 06:04 AM   #10
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 40,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangetsu View Post
No, there are no other brands worth consideration. That may sound snobbish, but it's effectively true. People may use other brands, but for photographers, there are really only 2 brands, Nikon and Canon.

Personally, I like Nikon equipment, I've been using it for 20 years, and I have no complaints. Canon also makes good equipment, but I would only rate their top level cameras as "excellent".

I began photography as a hobby, and became more seriously involved with it over the years. I've upgraded from old manual focus film cameras to the new DSLRs, but much of my old gear is interchangeable with the newer cameras. I have a collection of 20 odd lenses, and most of them are old (and expensive) manual focus models. It's nice that the old lenses work on my new camera, with the exception of an old 6mm fisheye lens.

You don't need 10 megapixels. Good quality 35mm film is equal in resolution to 4 megapixels, and 35 mm film is good enough to project the giant images at your local movie theater, need I say more?

For under $600 you can get a new Nikon D40 kit with a good quality lens. Now that the new D90 is out, the D80 will probably fall in price significantly, though it might be tough to find one for $600 at the moment. You should look on Ebay for a low mileage D70s. It has all the necessary features, it's durable, has a decent LCD display on the back, and they can be had for cheap. You might even have enough money left over for a second lens.
considering that you're using a misleading analogy, yes.
botto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 06:07 AM   #11
AnthonyG
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Bikes:
Posts: 3,710
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangetsu View Post
No, there are no other brands worth consideration. That may sound snobbish, but it's effectively true. People may use other brands, but for photographers, there are really only 2 brands, Nikon and Canon.
Ahh, Wrong. I was a professional photographer for a number of years and I owned and used Nikon, Konica and Bronica camera equipment on professional jobs. Real professionals use whatever camera equipment they desire. Its a tool.

This notion that you either use Nikon or Cannon exclusively is petty nonsense. Sure they dominate the market for various reasons but to imply that you cant get good results from other camera's for professional use let alone try to imply that your cant get good results for personal use if you don't use Nikon or Cannon is just voodoo nonsense from those who don't know better.

I mean if you want to be a SERIOUS PRO camera snob then your talking Leica or Hasselblad to start with. Nikon or Cannon is for the proletariat.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 06:12 AM   #12
botto 
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 40,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyG View Post
Ahh, Wrong. I was a professional photographer for a number of years and I owned and used Nikon, Konica and Bronica camera equipment on professional jobs. Real professionals use whatever camera equipment they desire. Its a tool.

This notion that you either use Nikon or Cannon exclusively is petty nonsense. Sure they dominate the market for various reasons but to imply that you cant get good results from other camera's for professional use let alone try to imply that your cant get good results for personal use if you don't use Nikon or Cannon is just voodoo nonsense from those who don't know better.

I mean if you want to be a SERIOUS PRO camera snob then your talking Leica or Hasselblad to start with. Nikon or Cannon is for the proletariat.

Anthony
correct.
botto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 06:20 AM   #13
dewaday
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: upper devonian
Bikes:
Posts: 894
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyG View Post

I mean if you want to be a SERIOUS PRO camera snob then your talking Leica or Hasselblad to start with. Nikon or Cannon is for the proletariat.

Anthony
Leica? Blad? Pfft, old school status. Today you better come with Sinar or Leaf or Phase to be taken seriously.

As for Nikon and Canon being the only choices? Hilarious.
dewaday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 06:37 AM   #14
Ed in GA
The "now retired" Old Guy
 
Ed in GA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Savannah, GA, USA
Bikes: Trek Madone 4.5
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My final post.

The best way to buy the camera that suits you is......

Go to a well rounded local camera store (Not Ritz/Wolf Camera) and handle every brand and type DSLR they carry. See how the various cameras feel in your hands. Check out the full ergonomics of each brand then, wait.....

Go to various online sites and read the reviews of different cameras, www.dpreview.com comes to mind. See what they have to say about each of the models that 'you' find suit you best.

The latest real improvement in cameras, in my opinion, is the image stabilization. There are two types available. In Body and In Lens. The decision of which best fits your needs, and finances, can only be determined by you. In Body works with just about every lens. In Lens works only with IS lens. Be prepared for those type lens to be quite expensive.

auto-focus speed, FPS, Sensor size (mp) Type (Full frame, aps-c and there is a system called four thirds.), size, weight and what you intend to do with the camera are all considerations.


Above all, try them and read about them. Make an informed decision based on your needs and not on what someone here or in a camera store tells you that you "need".
__________________
"The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?"

Last edited by Ed in GA; 10-06-08 at 06:43 AM.
Ed in GA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:35 AM   #15
MrCrassic 
Senior Member
 
MrCrassic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR1 (with panda bear on the back!)
Posts: 3,650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by permanentjaun View Post
I'm an amateur looking to step up from a point and shoot to a digital SLR. I'm looking to spend $500-$600 total on the camera and lens. Automated functions are always good, but it'd be nice to have manual settings to play with for more artistic shots. How many pixels do I really need? I want 10mp simply because that seems to be the # for the top amateur SLR's and also because it's a round number.

Feel free to convince me I don't need 10mp although I do enjoy editing images. I have moderate photoshop experience, but will most likely be using a less powerful machine and will have to resort to either gimp or paint.net freeware for any editing.

What do I get? Does brand matter? I'd like to be able to buy additional lenses for my camera. Perhaps get a less mp camera to be able to purchase an addition lens?

Thanks for any help,
Matt
Note: I do my photography using Canon equipment, and know nothing about Nikon's line.

If you use Craigslist or eBay, $400 can get probably get you at least a Canon Digital Rebel XT, complete with the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 stock lens. If you're lucky, you may be able to find a Canon 20D (no lens) around this price.

For $500, you can probably get a new Digital Rebel XT and definitely a used Canon 20D, possibly with a low-end or third-party lens. If you're lucky, you can find a Canon 30D (no lens) or a Digital Rebel XTi (possibly with a lens) at around this price.

For $600, you can probably get a new Canon 20D (no lens) or used Canon 30D (no lens) and probably a new Digital Rebel XTi (with lens). If you're very lucky (and I mean very), you can find a Canon 40D at around this price, but definitely without a lens.

Here are reviews of all cameras mentioned:

Canon 20D
Canon 30D
Canon 40D
Canon Digital Rebel XT
Canon Digital Rebel XTi

If you do decide to get a Canon lens, make sure you buy the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8! This is the cheapest lens in Canon's lens lineup, but it is also one of their best. It's a must-have!
__________________
Ride more.

Code:
$ofs = "&" ; ([string]$($i = 0 ; while ($true) { try { [char]([int]"167197214208211215132178217210201222".substring($i,3) - 100) ; $i =
 $i+3 > catch { break >>)).replace('&','') ; $ofs=" " # Replace right angles with right curly braces
MrCrassic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:37 AM   #16
MrCrassic 
Senior Member
 
MrCrassic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR1 (with panda bear on the back!)
Posts: 3,650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyG View Post
Ahh, Wrong. I was a professional photographer for a number of years and I owned and used Nikon, Konica and Bronica camera equipment on professional jobs. Real professionals use whatever camera equipment they desire. Its a tool.

This notion that you either use Nikon or Cannon exclusively is petty nonsense. Sure they dominate the market for various reasons but to imply that you cant get good results from other camera's for professional use let alone try to imply that your cant get good results for personal use if you don't use Nikon or Cannon is just voodoo nonsense from those who don't know better.

I mean if you want to be a SERIOUS PRO camera snob then your talking Leica or Hasselblad to start with. Nikon or Cannon is for the proletariat.

Anthony
It's not the camera; it's the photographer (though the camera helps).
Here's a list of manufacturers you can read up on that manufacture cameras for the amateur market. This will take some time, so enjoy!

Nikon
Canon
Sony (Minolta)
Olympus
Pentax
Panasonic
__________________
Ride more.

Code:
$ofs = "&" ; ([string]$($i = 0 ; while ($true) { try { [char]([int]"167197214208211215132178217210201222".substring($i,3) - 100) ; $i =
 $i+3 > catch { break >>)).replace('&','') ; $ofs=" " # Replace right angles with right curly braces

Last edited by MrCrassic; 10-06-08 at 07:59 AM.
MrCrassic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 09:41 AM   #17
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed in GA View Post
Canon and Nikon make good equipment.

But, there are other brands available that are worth your consideration.

Don't overlook Pentax, Sony, Fuji and others.
Their cameras are ok (yes...ok) but the resale value of this equpiment is not what it is for Nikon & Canon.
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 09:43 AM   #18
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by botto View Post
correct.
+1
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:04 PM   #19
permanentjaun
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
permanentjaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Me = idiot.

Last edited by permanentjaun; 10-06-08 at 07:10 PM.
permanentjaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:11 PM   #20
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
He was talking about a 40D, not a D40





You should know that Nikon is the one who puts the D first, not canon

Unless of course you're talking about the D30



Or the 60D



Don't be confused though, that is much older than the 50D


But when they made the 10Dthey moved the D to the back, which is newer than the D30 but not newer than the 30D


So somehow we moved the numbers around to come up with a newer camera that both looks older and newer than the 30D and 60D yet is quite a bit older than the 50D which in fact is newer than the 30D but not younger than the 60D and in fact is a bit different than the D30



And please, don't confuse any of this with the 450D, which is a different camera entirely


It's confusing, i know but it probably proves a point...if you're paying attention. The bottom line is that all of these are great cameras, and if you can't take a good photograph with any of these then you are wasting your money and should probably buy a 35f...err, 35mm film camera

My vote would be for an ae-1, cheap and plenty of accessories.

Last edited by timmyquest; 10-06-08 at 07:41 PM.
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:25 PM   #21
permanentjaun
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
permanentjaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,713
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yea thanks. I was hoping no one would see my disastrous post. Now you've only confused me more. Gheesh. All I want is a good camera to document my travels in an above average fashion.

What's the big difference in quality stepping up in those cameras? I assume more MP's and perhaps more options into ISO settings up in the 1/3200+ range. Anything else worth considering?
permanentjaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:35 PM   #22
timmyquest
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Bikes:
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by permanentjaun View Post
Yea thanks. I was hoping no one would see my disastrous post. Now you've only confused me more. Gheesh. All I want is a good camera to document my travels in an above average fashion.

What's the big difference in quality stepping up in those cameras? I assume more MP's and perhaps more options into ISO settings up in the 1/3200+ range. Anything else worth considering?
Primarily, and in order of importance (to me).

1. ISO performance. Huge leap from the D30 to the 60D, even bigger to the 20D, even bigger to the 40D, we'll see about the 50D

The 60D and 10D (i believe) share the same sensor.'
The 20D and 30D share the same sensor

2. AF performance
The 10D was the first one to focus, OK, but the 20D was the first to do it well, each model gets better, the 50D is fantastic in this regard. None of them are as good as the original 1D...which gets better with each model*

AF sensors
D30: 3 points
60D: 3 points
10D: 7 points
20d-50D: 9 points

3. Continuous shutter speed

D30 3fps
60D 3.3fps
10D 3.3fps
20D 5fps
30D 5fps
40D 6.3fps
50D 6.3fps

4. Sensor size

As i've mentioned, my 1D is only 4mp and that is more than enough. Keep in mind, however, that the actual sensor is physically larger (1.3 crop vs 1.6) and thus, those 4mp are some of the biggest ever put into a DSLR. the large size of these pixels gives this camera a ton of leeway in terms of uprezing photographs. That said, the whole MP thing is vastly overrated

D30 3.1mp
60D/10D 6.3mp
20D/30D 8.2mp
40D 10.1mp
50D 15.1mp

Along the way some nice features have been added...it is safe to assume that with each model there has been improvements in the camera.

If you go with canon, try to get a 20D, it's a headache free camera. It focuses nicely, it can shoot at higher ISO's fine and it has a great battery life. Any model ahead of that and you run into some areas that can be problematic. 10D and below, for instance, are very noisy at ISO 800 and higher. The on board flash is also not as useful.

Look around at all the brands, you can certainly find a pentax that is good but i don't think you're going to find one within your budget that fills your needs/desires as well as Canon and Nikon, simply because all these other companies have been lollygagging about getting on board. And many of their first attempts are simply crap, so was canons..it just happened before everyone else tried. Also, honestly, it's only been about a year or two that Nikon has produced quality equipment. The most of their cameras in their line have sensors in them made by Sony, which for the longest time was their biggest bugaboo, poor ISO performance, primarily. Up until about the D40, Nikon SLR's were rubbish if you were looking strictly at the sensor. However, many love their ergonomics and the system itself...i have a hard time arguing that.

*the 1dMKIII has some focus issues...most consider this release a major flop

Last edited by timmyquest; 10-06-08 at 07:38 PM.
timmyquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 07:44 PM   #23
cmanbrazil
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Get the camera that you can find a deal on used lenses. Its the lenses that cost and make the difference.
cmanbrazil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-08, 08:07 PM   #24
MrCrassic 
Senior Member
 
MrCrassic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR1 (with panda bear on the back!)
Posts: 3,650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I also recommend the Canon 20D. I had the Digital Rebel (300D) before this, and getting this body was a huge step up.

While the megapixels don't really matter, the 20D had many more features (and a better focusing system), had a faster continuous shutter speed, had better materials in the body, more metering flexibility, etc. I use it for my photography for the school newspaper, and I personally like it better than the 40D (mostly because the LCD preview is accurate and I don't need the feature set of the 40D right now. Live View isn't that cracked up really).

Also keep in mind that expensive does not always correlate to better in your case. Personally, I think that if you start with something "basic" like the 300D (not the 350D, since the 300D is something of a crippled 10D...meaning you're kind of getting sort of a prosumer camera at a really sweet price). You'll definitely learn, and you'll find your limitations, which will make a camera upgrade much more sensible.
__________________
Ride more.

Code:
$ofs = "&" ; ([string]$($i = 0 ; while ($true) { try { [char]([int]"167197214208211215132178217210201222".substring($i,3) - 100) ; $i =
 $i+3 > catch { break >>)).replace('&','') ; $ofs=" " # Replace right angles with right curly braces
MrCrassic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-08, 12:44 AM   #25
iamlucky13
Footballus vita est
 
iamlucky13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes: Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
Posts: 2,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by permanentjaun View Post
Yea thanks. I was hoping no one would see my disastrous post. Now you've only confused me more. Gheesh. All I want is a good camera to document my travels in an above average fashion.

What's the big difference in quality stepping up in those cameras? I assume more MP's and perhaps more options into ISO settings up in the 1/3200+ range. Anything else worth considering?
Don't overthink it too much. List any dSLR currently on the market and I can find an amazing image taken with it within a few minutes, and plenty of great images.

Things that are nice to have, in order of importance (only in my opinion, but as many will agree with me as will vehemently argue):

Functional, easy to use controls
A big, clear viewfinder
Comfortable, stable handling
Good high ISO performance
A clear, bright screen so you can tell if a followup shot with different settings is worthwhile
Plenty of AF points (and no big AF complaints in reviews)
Lots of megapixels

I very deliberately put megapixels at the bottom and controls at the top. All the features in the world don't mean squat if you either don't know how to use them, or they're too much of a pain in the butt to bother with.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
I mean if you want to be a SERIOUS PRO camera snob then your talking Leica or Hasselblad to start with. Nikon or Cannon is for the proletariat.
__________________
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
iamlucky13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 PM.