I've had this discussion before and looking to see what you think here. It's about equality in showing male and female nudity in print and in the movies. Many times, someone may ask why they are able to show women full frontal nudity and not men. So, here's my theory .. I think it is because if a woman in just standing, there is basically no genitalia seen since it is basically between the legs (and we all know pubic hair does not count as genitalia, right?), so to actually see anything good, she'd have to be in a more suggestive position (which changes the movie rating and the kind of book it is ). But, to show male genitalia, a man need only stand there (unless very tiny) and there it is (again, changing the rating). I think that is where it is generally more accepted to show a female nude over a male because nothing is actually being seen. Any thoughts .. real or imagined?