Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    la vache fantôme phantomcow2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    6,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What size monitor do you run at work?

    One of the first things I noticed about my office is how crappy the computers are. They're some Dell from what looks like 2002 or 2003, with that is either a 17 or 19" 4:3 monitor. Pardon my ignorance, but is this normal in corporate America? Coming from a 24" widescreen setup at home, I find it painful to have to work between spreadsheets for hours a day on such a dinosaur.
    Last edited by phantomcow2; 06-07-10 at 07:48 AM. Reason: Typo
    C://dos
    C://dos.run
    run.dos.run

  2. #2
    Unique Vintage Steel cuda2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Allen, TX
    My Bikes
    Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
    Posts
    11,486
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a pair of (I think they are 19" or 20") LCD's, 4:3 ratio. I write code, so the vertical real estate on the screen is actually more valuable to me than width. Also having the same size on both screens is helpful as I move things from one side to the other frequently.

    At home I have a 19" 4:3 and a 22" wide, both have approx the same vertical resolution so the benefit is much the same as I move programs from screen to screen.
    [CENTER][URL="http://VeloBase.com"][IMG]http://velobase.com/App_Themes/VeloBase2_blue/Images/VeloBase2TitleCampagnolo.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/CENTER]
    [CENTER][URL="http://JonPFischer.com"][COLOR="#006400"]Fischer Photography[/COLOR][/URL] - [URL="http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php/785462-My-new-modern-quot-Classic-quot-Kirk-JKS-Classic-Terraplane"][COLOR="#8b0000"]Kirk Frameworks JKS-Classic Build Thread[/COLOR][/URL][/CENTER]

  3. #3
    part time rockstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ive got a 22" widescreen w/ decent res <3

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dual 19" 4:3 at work. Wouldn't want widescreen at work because of what I do, and two monitors is a must. Heck, I could use four...

  5. #5
    Unique Vintage Steel cuda2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Allen, TX
    My Bikes
    Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
    Posts
    11,486
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SonataInFSharp View Post
    Dual 19" 4:3 at work. Wouldn't want widescreen at work because of what I do, and two monitors is a must. Heck, I could use four...
    Think 1 more would be ideal for me, though even at that point I may start giving myself neck strain from turning my head all day from one side to the other. Visual Studio in one, the Database manager in another, and one more for the browser when running in debug. For now though, I can usually throw the browser up over my database window as I rarely need to see both of them at the same time.
    [CENTER][URL="http://VeloBase.com"][IMG]http://velobase.com/App_Themes/VeloBase2_blue/Images/VeloBase2TitleCampagnolo.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/CENTER]
    [CENTER][URL="http://JonPFischer.com"][COLOR="#006400"]Fischer Photography[/COLOR][/URL] - [URL="http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php/785462-My-new-modern-quot-Classic-quot-Kirk-JKS-Classic-Terraplane"][COLOR="#8b0000"]Kirk Frameworks JKS-Classic Build Thread[/COLOR][/URL][/CENTER]

  6. #6
    weights are heavy Tober1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    My Bikes
    CAAD9 5 (09)
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think people use more monitors than they need. I have ONE 20" and it's plenty.
    I do graphic design. Maybe if I did more web work it would be beneficial, but for the most part I think it's just so you can post about having 3 monitors. Ever heard of Cmd+tab?

  7. #7
    Senior Member avmanansala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Road Warrior
    Posts
    401
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Currently using dual 21" Samsung CRTs - should be transitioning to dual 22" wide screen LCDs when my agency gets a spending allowance to upgrade old components. I use it for CADD.

    Got a 19" wide LCD (or is it a 21"???) at home and it works for surfing the net and image editing.
    "Study your math, kids. Key to the Universe." - Gabriel in The Prophecy

  8. #8
    GATC
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    south Puget Sound
    Posts
    6,609
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No monitor, just a 12" laptop screen (or is it 13). It is 16:9

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dual NEC 19" 4:3.

    CAD drawings running on one (with 7:5 ratio sheets, with is 1.4, almost 4:3)
    CAD properties, file management, email, browser, itunes running on the other screen

    About 2/3 of the office run like this, the rest have a single 22" 16:9.

  10. #10
    L T X B O M P F A N S R apricissimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Melrose, MA
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Volpe, Bianchi San Jose, Redline 925
    Posts
    2,226
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a gigantic 27-inch iMac at work. The size is one of the few things I like about it

  11. #11
    Junior Member meatlikeproduct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    My Bikes
    ~'80 Motobecane Grand Record (SS)
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    19" for email and etc. and a 27" when I'm doing video editing.

  12. #12
    staring at the mountains superdex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Parker, CO
    My Bikes
    1x9 mtb commuter, Blue Racing Rc4AL w/Record
    Posts
    3,434
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    two flat screen monitors, 17" and 20" widescreen

  13. #13
    Addicted to Pavement sickmtbnutcase's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    SE WI
    My Bikes
    '99 DBR X2, '98 DB Response, '84 Raleigh Marathon, '80 Raleigh Reliant (fixed/single)
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dual Dell 24" (1920x1200). Could use one more.

  14. #14
    L T X B O M P F A N S R apricissimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Melrose, MA
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Volpe, Bianchi San Jose, Redline 925
    Posts
    2,226
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's funny how quick 27-in. starts to seem normal.

  15. #15
    derailleurs are overrated bigbenaugust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    KIGX
    My Bikes
    2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, 2012 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno SSCX
    Posts
    1,738
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dual 20"s. One full of xterms and RDP windows, the other for the browser (email, etc.).
    --Ben
    Carrboro Bike Coalition - putting the "bike" in "CARrboro" :)
    2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX
    Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014)
    Current Linux Usage (by machine): Arch: I openSUSE: III

  16. #16
    BF's Level 12 Wizard SingingSabre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    My Bikes
    Diamondback Sorrento turned Xtracycle commuter
    Posts
    1,414
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by apricissimus View Post
    It's funny how quick 27-in. starts to seem normal.
    That's what she said.
    Shameless plug (my sites):
    Photography
    Vanity
    Quote Originally Posted by Bklyn
    Obviously, the guy's like a 12th level white wizard or something. His mere presence is a danger to mortals.

  17. #17
    Senior Member mikeybikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Edgewater, CO
    My Bikes
    Tons
    Posts
    3,057
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dual 19" widescreen at work. Somewhere along the line, I managed to be the only tech support staff with two monitors. I think my boss knows to keep me happy.
    My Bikes: 2009 Breezer Uptown EX | 1980 Miyata 610 | 1970 Hercules | 198? Miele ?
    Wife's Bike: 2008 Globe City 7

    My Blog, a mix of bicycling, tech, and family.

  18. #18
    Fax Transport Specialist black_box's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    chicago burbs
    My Bikes
    '07 fuji cross pro, '10 gary fisher x-caliber
    Posts
    785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    dual 17" 4:3 at work. Lots of reading and word documents, so widescreen doesn't make sense. 2 is usually enough, sometimes 3 might be nice.

  19. #19
    la vache fantôme phantomcow2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    6,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tober1 View Post
    I think people use more monitors than they need. I have ONE 20" and it's plenty.
    I do graphic design. Maybe if I did more web work it would be beneficial, but for the most part I think it's just so you can post about having 3 monitors. Ever heard of Cmd+tab?
    I think having more screen available is one of those things where you don't realize how awesome and beneficial it is until you've experienced it. I was very skeptical before buying my first widescreen 22" LCD 3 or 4 years ago, but that skepticism was quickly eroded when I had two documents -- full size -- side by side. Then I upped the ante and got a 24" .

    It's extraordinarily convenient being able to have two documents side by side. I can type a paper on the left and have the PDF of the article I'm citing data from on the right. Or have the original copy and a version I am editing of that very same paper side by side. Or I can have an excel spreadsheet with umpteen columns open at the same time and not have to scroll over 1/2 a mile to see them all.
    C://dos
    C://dos.run
    run.dos.run

  20. #20
    la vache fantôme phantomcow2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    6,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by apricissimus View Post
    I have a gigantic 27-inch iMac at work. The size is one of the few things I like about it
    27"?! That's fantastic. I have only heard of such a beast.
    C://dos
    C://dos.run
    run.dos.run

  21. #21
    Quirky Grifter LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    20,698
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    8 Thread(s)
    22" widescreen at work
    22" wide LCD + 19" not-so-wide CRT at home
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  22. #22
    Senior Member mikeybikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Edgewater, CO
    My Bikes
    Tons
    Posts
    3,057
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tober1 View Post
    I think people use more monitors than they need. I have ONE 20" and it's plenty.
    I do graphic design. Maybe if I did more web work it would be beneficial, but for the most part I think it's just so you can post about having 3 monitors. Ever heard of Cmd+tab?
    At any one time, I have six windows I need to monitor.
    Two windows for phone line SLAs, the softphone, the live chat window, agent adherence window and the ticket queue.

    I started with a regular 17" screen and got extremely frustrated having to constantly alt-tab between applications. Dual screens make it so much easier to keep all six of the necessary windows open and visible at the same time.
    My Bikes: 2009 Breezer Uptown EX | 1980 Miyata 610 | 1970 Hercules | 198? Miele ?
    Wife's Bike: 2008 Globe City 7

    My Blog, a mix of bicycling, tech, and family.

  23. #23
    NFL Owner monogodo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Irving Heritage District
    My Bikes
    7-Eleven Eddy Merckx, Vitus Futural, Catamount FRS, Colnago SL, SS MTB
    Posts
    1,487
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm running dual monitors at work, a 19" & a 15", both 4:3.

    Lotus Notes, gtalk window w/ the wife, and whatever folder I'm working from open on the 15", and Firefox, Command WorkStation & whatever app I happen to be using at the time open on the 19"
    198? Colnago Super (Campy Record) | 1989 Eddy Merckx 7-Eleven Team Issue (Dura Ace) | Catamount MFS (1x8) | Top Image Neptune (SS)

  24. #24
    Senior Member shouldberiding's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    My Bikes
    '08 Trek 7.3FX
    Posts
    812
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    14.5" screen, 1024x768 resolution.

    I'm almost a little surprised we're not running Windows 95.

  25. #25
    riding once again jschen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    '06 Cervelo R3, '05 Specialized Allez
    Posts
    7,360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    27" iMac (2560x1440, owned by me) at my office. My lab's computer room has 17" monitors at 1280x1024. We're planning on replacing them with 24" monitors at 1920x1080 since having more screen space makes our paper writing a lot more efficient. I much prefer one huge monitor over two smaller ones. One can be much more flexible in arranging windows when working with a single piece of screen real estate.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tober1 View Post
    I think people use more monitors than they need. I have ONE 20" and it's plenty.
    I do graphic design. Maybe if I did more web work it would be beneficial, but for the most part I think it's just so you can post about having 3 monitors. Ever heard of Cmd+tab?
    Depends on what you're doing. Cmd-Tab is great, but sometimes, you really want multiple windows fully available at the same time. For example, if you need to work in one window (say, typing a manuscript) while referencing something else (say, a scientific figure), it's hugely helpful to be able to see both at full size. Sure, I could cram my text window into the vertical space above or below my figure, having to scan my head up or down to get to it, and not being able to see the rest of the paragraph. Or, I can make my text window nice and big so that I can refer to text just above and below what I'm typing while still being able to reference the figure at a size where I can fully understand what's going on. My 27" monitor allows me to do that. It's good enough for three page-sized documents side by side. More than that, and I'll accept some overlap and bring windows to the forefront as necessary. (I rarely need to deal with more than three pages simultaneously anyways. "Simultaneously" in this context meaning referring to all of them repeatedly within a 20 second period.)

    I bought the bigger iMac since my older iMac died on me. But in retrospect, it's so much more efficient working this way that I should have bought the 27" iMac the second it came out. Actually, I should have bought a 30" monitor setup at the beginning of my book writing, as I had seriously considered doing. (The extra 160 pixels of height isn't important, but it was available long before the high-resolution 27" monitors came along.)

    Quote Originally Posted by x136 View Post
    Vertical resolution is handy on a computer. Operating systems tend to have their taskbars and docks horizontally, and the software has a title bar along the top, menus under that, then toolbars, maybe tab bars, then content, then maybe a toolbar along the bottom and a status bar.

    I'd take a 1920x1440 monitor over 1920x1080 any day. Or a netbook with 1024x768 instead of 1024x600.
    Agreed on smaller monitors. But when monitors get big enough to show a full sheet of paper in portrait mode with plenty of room for toolbars, then I'd rather extra width. In other words, I'd take my 2560x1440 monitor over a hypothetical 2221x1660 monitor (4:3 ratio, same number of pixels). Beyond ~1200 pixels height (at a pixel density comparable to that on my iMac), I'd rather get extra width. I suppose beyond ~4000 pixels height, I might again prefer more height.
    If you notice this notice then you will notice that this notice is not worth noticing.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •