Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    in luv with two wheels On Any Sunday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    San Diego, California
    My Bikes
    2007 Trek 4300
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    1st ammendent question: can you record a conversation and use it as evidence?

    Slightly complex first ammendment question: Can a voice recording made with a digital voice recorder/micro-cassette tape be accepted as evidence in a California court? Or is it against the law to record a conversaton? Scenario(s): these recordings were not made on the telephone. I need to be clear that in both cases a telephone was not involved. In both cases communication between the two parties was done in person and/or face to face.
    In scenario #1 the conversation took place outdoors on public property where it is not reasonable for any one person to expect any measure of privacy. In other words it was made in a place where any person can come and go 24/7/365.
    In scenario #2 the exact same dynamic is in place though with a slightly different set of circumstances: that conversation was made indoors in the hallway of a building, a building that is considered to be private property (as an example say for instance the hallway in a hotel, but NOT in a private room). As in scenario #1, it would be reasonable to conclude that a person would not or could not expect to receive any measure of privacy because inhabitants and/or employees of the hotel could come and go at will 24/7/365. Again, both questions pertain to the state of California.

  2. #2
    on by skijor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Vision R40, Bacchetta Giro 20 ATT
    Posts
    876
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I believe the recordee must be informed that they are being recorded in order for it to be legal.

  3. #3
    NFL Owner monogodo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Irving Heritage District
    My Bikes
    7-Eleven Eddy Merckx, Vitus Futural, Catamount FRS, Colnago SL, SS MTB
    Posts
    1,486
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends on the state in which one lives.

    Some allow it with no restrictions, others require both parties to be informed and agree.

    Federal law permits it so long as at least one party agrees.

    California requires both parties to consent.

    Just re-read the original post, and saw the caveat about the telephone. Went back and re-read the link I posted about California law, and saw this:
    California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation.
    It seems there's no distinction between telephone conversation or non-telephone conversation to the State of California.

    Here's more:
    If you are recording someone without their knowledge in a public or semi-public place like a street or restaurant, the person whom you're recording may or may not have "an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation," and the reasonableness of the expectation would depend on the particular factual circumstances. Therefore, you cannot necessarily assume that you are in the clear simply because you are in a public place.

    If you are operating in California, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you might be "private" or "confidential." In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the California wiretapping law can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party. See Cal. Penal Code § 637.2.
    Last edited by monogodo; 09-27-10 at 07:49 AM.
    198? Colnago Super (Campy Record) | 1989 Eddy Merckx 7-Eleven Team Issue (Dura Ace) | Catamount MFS (1x8) | Top Image Neptune (SS)

  4. #4
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,007
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Scenario 1: Maybe legal.....no reasonable expectation of privacy in many but not all cases.

    Scenario 2: Wiretapping laws of the state of residence apply.
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  5. #5
    You Know!? For Kids! jsharr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Just NW of Richardson Bike Mart
    My Bikes
    '05 Trek 1200 / '90 Trek 8000 / '? Falcon Europa
    Posts
    6,064
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    This thread is why I communicate with incoherent mumbling, hand signs, head motions and body language.
    Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
    Quote Originally Posted by colorider View Post
    Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.

  6. #6
    Banned. ModoVincere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,626
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
    This thread is why I communicate with incoherent mumbling, hand signs, head motions and body language.
    I use hand signals....like the one in my avatar.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As others have said, it depends on the state. We just went through this at work. Some states required both parties to know; some states require that at least one party knows. I don't think they are any states where nobody needs to know, though.

    Just repeating what others have said...

  8. #8
    Senior Member skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CO Springs, CO
    My Bikes
    08 Stumpjumper FSR Expert, 02 Litespeed Tuscany, 04 Specialized S-Works Epic
    Posts
    1,034
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depending on why you are asking this question, you should seek the advise of a lawyer on what the use of the recording might be. And what the ramifications of making such a recording could be to you, should their existence come to light.
    www.teamnavycycling.org
    2010 Pivot Mach 429
    09 Felt Nine Race
    03 Litespeed Tuscany

  9. #9
    Peddler Seamless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Road Warrior 800 & H400
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by On Any Sunday View Post
    Slightly complex first ammendment question
    This isn't legal advice, so you should consult local counsel, but in general--

    • Your two hypotheticals don't necessarily raise a 1st Amendment issue (presumably, free speech), unless a governmental entity was one of the parties or made the recording. The Bill of Rights' individual freedoms apply only as against government action; you don't suggest any government involvement in the conversation.
    • The parties can speak as freely as they want under both of your scenarios; the issue is whether permission is needed to record the other party's speech.
    • California's rules of evidence and procedure might distinguish between the intended forum (e.g., criminal charge or domestic relations/child support case) and the purpose for which a recording is sought to be introduced (the clearest is in support of an allegation that an illegal recording was made).
    • Some states are highly restrictive to protect claimed beneficial state or public interests (e.g., Illinois currently outlaws taped conversations with law enforcement officers--that's an actual 1st A. case currently being litigated; e.g., California has very stringent publicity rights), but invasion of privacy and/or dissemination of personal information is generally considered a tort that can be brought in many states.
    • One can hold a private conversation in a public venue, as it may still be possible to ensure that people not involved in the conversation cannot overhear (e.g., whisper in the other party's ear, such as attorneys do with their clients during depositions or in courtrooms during trials; conversation in a public library room behind a closed glass door; on a public park bench not within any other person's listening distance).
    `,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,
    2005 Cannondale Road Warrior 800

  10. #10
    Surf Bum
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pacifica, CA
    My Bikes
    Vintage Trek, Vintage Diamond Back Mountain Bike, Bianchi Axis CrossBike
    Posts
    2,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IANAL, but if this is a criminal case we are talking about, I believe that if such a recording was to find its way into the hands of the police or prosecution, they could still use it as evidence. They didn't make the recording and didn't violate anyone's rights, so they are allowed to use it as evidence. This sounded crazy to me when I first heard it, but perhaps the lawyers here can explain further.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Zaneluke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Germantown MD
    My Bikes
    Trek Y-5
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dumb question, but hwowdo you prove the person you recorded is said person? Without video? Would you have to hire a speech expert to testify?

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Terre Haute, Lafayette, or Indianapolis, IN, depending on the day
    My Bikes
    n, I would like n+1
    Posts
    1,916
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^You may just have to convince the jury that it's the same person, which may or may not be hard depending on the crowd.

  13. #13
    Senior Member DannoXYZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Saratoga, CA
    Posts
    11,495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaneluke View Post
    Dumb question, but hwowdo you prove the person you recorded is said person? Without video? Would you have to hire a speech expert to testify?
    Voice-analysis software is very sophisticated. It can overlay unique-patterns between two difference sources and make or disqualify matches with high certainty. This is one way the NSA's Predator software can sift through billions of messages a day.

  14. #14
    Senior Member mustachiod's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    699
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    in related news, a Harford County Circuit Court judge ruled this afternoon that a motorcyclist who was arrested for videotaping his traffic stop by a Maryland State Trooper was within his rights to record the confrontation.: http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news...ping_case.html
    Quote Originally Posted by powers2b View Post
    BF does not have the answer to what you will be happy with.

  15. #15
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,563
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In Illinois if you are caught recording a cop without permission it's a class 3 felony for the 1st offense, mandatory jail time. Record a regular citizen without permission , it's a class 1 felony.

  16. #16
    Me and the cat... Pamestique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    My Bikes
    2002 Lemond Zurich, 2006 Santa Cruz Superlight, 2010 Landshark, 2012 Santa Cruz Juliana, 2014 Juliana Premiero Origin 29er
    Posts
    4,346
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skijor View Post
    I believe the recordee must be informed that they are being recorded in order for it to be legal.
    In California, the other party must first give informed consent. In other words, you must ask/state "I am going to record this conversation, do I have your permission?" If the person says anything other than "yes" it cannot or will not be used as evidence; in fact, it must be excluded by the Court. And you may/will be held liable for illegal recording/wiretapping. Be careful what you do.

    "Twelve states require, under most circumstances, the consent of all parties to a conversation. Those jurisdictions are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. Be aware that you will sometimes hear these referred to inaccurately as “two-party consent” laws. If there are more than two people involved in the conversation, all must consent to the taping.

    Regardless of the state, it is almost always illegal to record a conversation to which you are not a party, do not have consent to tape, and could not naturally overhear.

    Federal law and most state laws also make it illegal to disclose the contents of an illegally intercepted call or communication.

    At least 24 states have laws outlawing certain uses of hidden cameras in private places, although many of the laws are specifically limited to attempts to record nudity. Also, many of the statutes concern unattended hidden cameras, not cameras hidden on a person engaged in a conversation. Journalists should be aware, however, that the audio portion of a videotape will be treated under the regular wiretapping laws in any state. And regardless of whether a state has a criminal law regarding cameras, undercover recording in a private place can prompt civil lawsuits for invasion of privacy."
    Last edited by Pamestique; 09-28-10 at 04:46 PM.
    ______________________________________________________________

    Private docent led mountain bike rides through Limestone Canyon. Go to letsgooutside.org and register today! Also available: hikes, equestrian rides and family events as well as trail maintenance and science study.

  17. #17
    Senior Member tizeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    1985 Falcon, 2008 Jamis Dakota Sport
    Posts
    102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Slightly different twist. If the law makes it illegal, there is no law against taking "personal notes" of an interaction. Just because your written personal notes of an incident are exceedingly accurate based on the 100% recall provided by the recording should be immaterial. Officially there is no recording.

    It is always something I have wondered about. A simple end around.

  18. #18
    Senior Member skiahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CO Springs, CO
    My Bikes
    08 Stumpjumper FSR Expert, 02 Litespeed Tuscany, 04 Specialized S-Works Epic
    Posts
    1,034
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    In Illinois if you are caught recording a cop without permission it's a class 3 felony for the 1st offense, mandatory jail time. Record a regular citizen without permission , it's a class 1 felony.
    Interesting... I wonder if the cops use dashboard cams.

    Equal protection and all....
    www.teamnavycycling.org
    2010 Pivot Mach 429
    09 Felt Nine Race
    03 Litespeed Tuscany

  19. #19
    Who has a good sense of humor for going along with my little April Fool Gag (The Admin) Mr. Markets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    on my laptop
    My Bikes
    Longbikes Slipstream
    Posts
    4,067
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe View Post
    Scenario 1: Maybe legal.....no reasonable expectation of privacy in many but not all cases.

    Scenario 2: Wiretapping laws of the state of residence apply.
    The Feds can usurp state law for their own purposes as they see fit...

  20. #20
    Portland Fred banerjek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    My Bikes
    Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid
    Posts
    10,390
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by monogodo View Post
    It depends on the state in which one lives.

    Some allow it with no restrictions, others require both parties to be informed and agree.
    It's probably worth checking the exact provisions where you live.

    I find it difficult to believe that a large number of states would outlaw security monitoring in banks, stores, etc as criminals would not agree to be recorded.

  21. #21
    Administrator CbadRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    On the bridge with Picard
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
    Posts
    5,711
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skiahh View Post
    Interesting... I wonder if the cops use dashboard cams.

    Equal protection and all....
    I think it's a different issue if the camera location is known (as in a police car or bank). Think of all the videos taken by cyclists with helmet cameras, or videos people have captured with their cell phones. Helmet cams and cell phone video have been used in criminal trials.
    Quote Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
    Does the ignore feature just replace all of the poster's text with "Said something stupid" because that would be awesome.
    Forum Guidelines *click here*

  22. #22
    Portland Fred banerjek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    My Bikes
    Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid
    Posts
    10,390
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CbadRider View Post
    I think it's a different issue if the camera location is known (as in a police car or bank). Think of all the videos taken by cyclists with helmet cameras, or videos people have captured with their cell phones. Helmet cams and cell phone video have been used in criminal trials.
    There just has to be a list of reasonable exceptions. Otherwise, I could see it now -- some dope addict breaks into a house, assaults someone and steals a bunch of stuff. The action is caught on a webcam. Evidence gets tossed out because dope addict did not agree to be videoed and home owner is charged with a felony.....

  23. #23
    Peddler Seamless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Road Warrior 800 & H400
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CbadRider View Post
    I think it's a different issue if the camera location is known (as in a police car or bank). Think of all the videos taken by cyclists with helmet cameras, or videos people have captured with their cell phones. Helmet cams and cell phone video have been used in criminal trials.
    Quote Originally Posted by banerjek View Post
    There just has to be a list of reasonable exceptions. Otherwise, I could see it now -- some dope addict breaks into a house, assaults someone and steals a bunch of stuff. The action is caught on a webcam. Evidence gets tossed out because dope addict did not agree to be videoed and home owner is charged with a felony.....
    Video recordings aren't prohibited by these laws, only conversations. (The easy fix, should a camera also record the sound of a conversation: playback sound would be muted and not allowed.) Also, the laws don't prohibit recording all conversations, only those where consent is not given (by one or all parties, depending on the jurisdiction) or cannot be reasonably inferred from the circumstances.
    `,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,`,
    2005 Cannondale Road Warrior 800

  24. #24
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,563
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skiahh View Post
    Interesting... I wonder if the cops use dashboard cams.

    Equal protection and all....
    , [Bufford Pusser on] yer not from around here, are ya boy![Bufford Pusser off].

    Yes, in Illinois cops have dashcams, yes, the cops know the law and will arrest anyone who records them. It's not clear if it's illegal if you don't record audio (someone needs to get arrested, charged with a class 3 felony, then fight it in court). Any businesses with security cams have very clear posted signs stating you're being recorded, I assume this takes care of consent.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •