Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Foo Off-Topic chit chat with no general subject.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-27-12, 07:31 PM   #1
windhchaser 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Bikes: Felt nine flow
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Evil evil sugar

i always wonder why anyone would drink or eat some chemical over real sugar.Another thing i wonder is why sunny d is so poplar .What is wrong with a orange drink made of just oranges?
windhchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-12, 08:12 PM   #2
Artkansas 
Pedaled too far.
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Bikes:
Posts: 12,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by windhchaser View Post
i always wonder why anyone would drink or eat some chemical over real sugar.Another thing i wonder is why sunny d is so poplar .What is wrong with a orange drink made of just oranges?
Those chemicals are cheaper than oranges. But they have what we crave, sweet!
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjforrestal View Post
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-12, 08:21 PM   #3
windhchaser 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Bikes: Felt nine flow
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
That must be it.I can tear up some real oj used to get it for 3 bucks a gallon hect in fla i just grab the oranges from back yard and a grapefruit best drink ever
windhchaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-12, 09:11 PM   #4
bjtesch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irving, TX
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount
Posts: 368
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If I'm going to drink a soft drink I drink a real coke, not diet. When I want orange juice I buy real orange juice. If I want to save calories I drink water, and not fancy pants expensive water out of a little bottle. My house has lots of faucets and that is fine with me.
bjtesch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-12, 10:52 PM   #5
skijor 
on by
 
skijor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Bikes: Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Bacchetta Giro 20 ATT
Posts: 920
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Can't patent a plant. Plus, market to an idiotic American public (I know that's redundant) and wala-->profit. (See sucralose--aka Splenda, aspartame--aka Nutrasweet, and HFCS).
No really, the FDA is looking out for our best interests
skijor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-12, 11:09 PM   #6
bigbenaugust 
derailleurs are overrated
 
bigbenaugust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KIGX
Bikes: 2009 Fantom CX, 2012 Fantom Cross Uno, Bakfiets
Posts: 1,979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
We did have a thread about Olestra recently...
__________________
--Ben
Carrboro Bike Coalition - putting the "bike" in "CARrboro" :)
2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, and a Bakfiets
Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014), 2008 Citizen Folder (2015)
Non-Bike hardware: openSUSE Leap - LinuxMint Debian Edition 2 - Mac OS 10.6 - Android 4.4 - CyanogenMod 13
bigbenaugust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 04:50 PM   #7
apclassic9
Caustic Soccer Mom
 
apclassic9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Millstone WV
Bikes:
Posts: 1,760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sugar turns to fat in your body... so do all the sugar "substitutes"... except for that steevia stuff
__________________
As with mud, life, too, slides by.
apclassic9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 04:52 PM   #8
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by windhchaser View Post
i always wonder why anyone would drink or eat some chemical over real sugar.Another thing i wonder is why sunny d is so poplar .What is wrong with a orange drink made of just oranges?
I'm a diabetic....there's enough sugar in regular old food, don't need any additional sugar. So those chemicals allow me to enjoy a sweet flavor once in a while without shooting my blood sugars through the roof.
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 04:52 PM   #9
The_DK
Senior Member
 
The_DK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sacramento
Bikes: 2003 Trek 7300, 2012 CAAD 10 5
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by apclassic9 View Post
sugar turns to fat in your body... so do all the sugar "substitutes"... except for that steevia stuff


you mean like aspartame? aspartame doesn't turn into fat. Sugar doesn't automatically turn into fat either, unless you're eating too much of it. But so do other carbohydrates and protein.
The_DK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 04:55 PM   #10
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by apclassic9 View Post
sugar turns to fat in your body... so do all the sugar "substitutes"... except for that steevia stuff
you might want to think about that one.
Splenda (sucralose) doesn't get absorbed....how does it turn to fat in the body?
Aspartame is a molecule comprised of two amino acids....it's basically a very very short protein, and is so sweet that the amount used has practically zero calories. How is that going to turn into fat?
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 05:26 PM   #11
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Bikes:
Posts: 6,000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModoVincere View Post
you might want to think about that one.
Splenda (sucralose) doesn't get absorbed....how does it turn to fat in the body?
Aspartame is a molecule comprised of two amino acids....it's basically a very very short protein, and is so sweet that the amount used has practically zero calories. How is that going to turn into fat?
Certainly not directly since, as you point out, there are very few calories in the artificial sweeteners. But there are quite a number of studies that showed an association between use of these sweeteners and weight gain. One is at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/

I've also read a study (but have lost the cite) where college students were randomly assigned to two groups - one agreed to only drink diet drinks while the other agreed to only drink sugared drinks at all meals. Both groups ate at the college cafeteria and were free to take whatever food they wanted but all of their food and beverage intake was carefully monitored. The conclusion of the study was that the group drinking the artificially sweetened drinks actually consumed more calories (and gained more weight) than the group drinking the sugared drinks. Sure the first group had far fewer calories from the drinks, but they more than made up for that by going back for more second helpings, eating more desserts, etc. The researchers concluded that the sweetness in the drinks stimulated the body to expect an influx of sugar and the body responded with insulin production and other physiological changes. When the expected sugar didn't arrive this led to increased hunger sensations and the students responded by eating more food - especially food with a high sugar content.

Another factor is that we can get habituated to flavors that we consume frequently. So after a sustained diet with lots of sweet tastes (from either sugar or the calorie-free substitutes), we tend to want even more sweet tastes in the food we eat and therefore crave foods with those tastes - many of which will have lots of calories.
prathmann is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 05:34 PM   #12
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
Certainly not directly since, as you point out, there are very few calories in the artificial sweeteners. But there are quite a number of studies that showed an association between use of these sweeteners and weight gain. One is at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/

I've also read a study (but have lost the cite) where college students were randomly assigned to two groups - one agreed to only drink diet drinks while the other agreed to only drink sugared drinks at all meals. Both groups ate at the college cafeteria and were free to take whatever food they wanted but all of their food and beverage intake was carefully monitored. The conclusion of the study was that the group drinking the artificially sweetened drinks actually consumed more calories (and gained more weight) than the group drinking the sugared drinks. Sure the first group had far fewer calories from the drinks, but they more than made up for that by going back for more second helpings, eating more desserts, etc. The researchers concluded that the sweetness in the drinks stimulated the body to expect an influx of sugar and the body responded with insulin production and other physiological changes. When the expected sugar didn't arrive this led to increased hunger sensations and the students responded by eating more food - especially food with a high sugar content.

Another factor is that we can get habituated to flavors that we consume frequently. So after a sustained diet with lots of sweet tastes (from either sugar or the calorie-free substitutes), we tend to want even more sweet tastes in the food we eat and therefore crave foods with those tastes - many of which will have lots of calories.
Which is different than what you said in the post I'm quoting below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by apclassic9 View Post
sugar turns to fat in your body... so do all the sugar "substitutes"... except for that steevia stuff
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 06:31 PM   #13
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Bikes:
Posts: 6,000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModoVincere View Post
Which is different than what you said in the post I'm quoting below.
Why are you claiming that *I* said something and then posting a quote from someone else?
prathmann is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 06:32 PM   #14
The_DK
Senior Member
 
The_DK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sacramento
Bikes: 2003 Trek 7300, 2012 CAAD 10 5
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Where's my pirates and global warming graph when I need it?
The_DK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-12, 06:33 PM   #15
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
Why are you claiming that *I* said something and then posting a quote from someone else?
whoops...sorry, I did a quick drive by post....but it is different than what ap said.
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-12, 09:41 AM   #16
Rowan
Has opinion, will express
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 14,651
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by skijor View Post
Can't patent a plant. Plus, market to an idiotic American public (I know that's redundant) and wala-->profit. (See sucralose--aka Splenda, aspartame--aka Nutrasweet, and HFCS).
No really, the FDA is looking out for our best interests
You are so, so, so wrong about this, that it is almost scary.

Plant rights are what will end up cornering the world's food supplies to a few mega-companies if they are allowed to get away with it.

Think about the law suits that have already been done and won by big companies that have gene-modified crops such as canola.

And my former employer successfully sued an orchardist for hundreds of thousands of dollars (as in verging on a million) for stealing, based on the grower planting trees that were propagated from plants originally supplied by my ex-boss (ie, scions were cut from the original trees and transplanted on to cheap rootstock).

You think copyright for music, art and writing is a warzone, the stakes are much higher in the food industry.

Most of the fruit and vegetables in the supermarkets you see that go by the simple names of celery, apples, cherries, carrots and so on, have varietal names attached to them. The rights to those varieties channel back to an owner somewhere, whether it's the seed or otherwise.

The only way to escape is to use cuttings or seed propogated from age-old varieties, but then they don't keep particularly well between picking and getting to market, and their yields are probably much lower, and they won't grow in anything but the right conditions, even though the overall quality and taste off the tree are probably better.
Rowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-12, 10:16 AM   #17
skijor 
on by
 
skijor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Bikes: Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Bacchetta Giro 20 ATT
Posts: 920
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
You are so, so, so wrong about this, that it is almost scary.

Plant rights are what will end up cornering the world's food supplies to a few mega-companies if they are allowed to get away with it.

Think about the law suits that have already been done and won by big companies that have gene-modified crops such as canola.

And my former employer successfully sued an orchardist for hundreds of thousands of dollars (as in verging on a million) for stealing, based on the grower planting trees that were propagated from plants originally supplied by my ex-boss (ie, scions were cut from the original trees and transplanted on to cheap rootstock).

You think copyright for music, art and writing is a warzone, the stakes are much higher in the food industry.

Most of the fruit and vegetables in the supermarkets you see that go by the simple names of celery, apples, cherries, carrots and so on, have varietal names attached to them. The rights to those varieties channel back to an owner somewhere, whether it's the seed or otherwise.

The only way to escape is to use cuttings or seed propogated from age-old varieties, but then they don't keep particularly well between picking and getting to market, and their yields are probably much lower, and they won't grow in anything but the right conditions, even though the overall quality and taste off the tree are probably better.
Ok, how about you can't patent a naturally occurring plant? Of course the frankenfoods are a different matter. Those never would've occurred naturally.
skijor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-12, 10:18 AM   #18
Artkansas 
Pedaled too far.
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Bikes:
Posts: 12,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_DK View Post
you mean like aspartame? aspartame doesn't turn into fat.
I suspect they were thinking of HFCS, the leading sugar substitute. Fructose turns into fat just about faster than anything.
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjforrestal View Post
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-12, 10:39 AM   #19
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artkansas View Post
I suspect they were thinking of HFCS, the leading sugar substitute. Fructose turns into fat just about faster than anything.
And yet, HFCS is sugar....
It's not sucrose, but sugar is more than just sucrose (table sugar....which is actually two sugars...glucose and fructose).
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-12, 01:23 PM   #20
Rowan
Has opinion, will express
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 14,651
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by skijor View Post
Ok, how about you can't patent a naturally occurring plant? Of course the frankenfoods are a different matter. Those never would've occurred naturally.
You don't quite get it.

You cross-breed two plants that occur naturally to produce a certain type of fruit, which could conceivably happen in nature, and you can register it for plant rights. It's just that you have short-tracked the natural process by cross-pollinating certain varieties to produce another. Nature has dealt with the genetic issues.

These plants I am talking about aren't frankenfoods as might be the description for the ones like canola in which the gene has been altered deliberately by human intervention.

All those grapes that make your wine, all those apples on those trees, all those potatoes -- in fact, just about any fresh food that you buy and eat is making someone wealthy at the other end of the line because they own the rights to that plant. Much like the music you listen to.
Rowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-12, 01:25 PM   #21
Rowan
Has opinion, will express
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 14,651
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
So what about ace-K?
Rowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-12, 07:26 AM   #22
skijor 
on by
 
skijor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Bikes: Waterford RS-33, Salsa Vaya, Bacchetta Giro 20 ATT
Posts: 920
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
You don't quite get it.

You cross-breed two plants that occur naturally to produce a certain type of fruit, which could conceivably happen in nature, and you can register it for plant rights. It's just that you have short-tracked the natural process by cross-pollinating certain varieties to produce another. Nature has dealt with the genetic issues.

These plants I am talking about aren't frankenfoods as might be the description for the ones like canola in which the gene has been altered deliberately by human intervention.

All those grapes that make your wine, all those apples on those trees, all those potatoes -- in fact, just about any fresh food that you buy and eat is making someone wealthy at the other end of the line because they own the rights to that plant. Much like the music you listen to.
Yes, I get it. I just didn't realize that the more plausibly naturally occurring results were patentable. I suspect the legal aspects of this vary greatly...especially in Europe. I realize man has toyed with plants and animals for thousands of years to obtain more practical and tasty animals/plants.

Stevia is a better example of what I was thinking of. Products that contain stevia are marketed and sold under a name that sounds like that word so those of us that know of its advantages make the connection. But what we're getting isn't typical stevia. And that may be because stevia, as it's grown today, has not been patented...or because the folks who grew that "new" product tweaked the plant just enough to make it dissimilar enough to earn a patent, yet retain its use as an economical sugar alternative.

From their FAQ:
"******* isolated the best tasting part of the plant Rebaudiside A (one of nine glycocisdes within stevia) to develop rebiana"

Last edited by skijor; 09-03-12 at 07:29 AM. Reason: clarification, I hope
skijor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-12, 09:25 AM   #23
Rowan
Has opinion, will express
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 14,651
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
I asked whether anyone knew about ace-K because that is a substance that apparently Pepsi is looking to use in its diet and Max cola varieties.

It seems that aspartame breaks down in sunlight and heat, as anyone who has ridden a bike with it on board will know -- the taste goes right off.

ace-K is an abbreviation of acesulfame potassium which is said to be 200 times sweeter than table sugar but one-third that of sucralose. It is less sensitive to being broken down in light.
Rowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-12, 10:07 AM   #24
StupidlyBrave 
Chepooka
 
StupidlyBrave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Central PA
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1400 7spd; 2001 Litespeed Arenberg 10 speed
Posts: 1,167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In regards to genetically modified plants... I hiked some part of the Florida trail a while back and encountered a wild Orange tree. The fruit was juicy, but not the least bit sweet.
StupidlyBrave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-12, 11:39 AM   #25
ModoVincere
Riding Heaven's Highways on the grand tour
 
ModoVincere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
I asked whether anyone knew about ace-K because that is a substance that apparently Pepsi is looking to use in its diet and Max cola varieties.

It seems that aspartame breaks down in sunlight and heat, as anyone who has ridden a bike with it on board will know -- the taste goes right off.

ace-K is an abbreviation of acesulfame potassium which is said to be 200 times sweeter than table sugar but one-third that of sucralose. It is less sensitive to being broken down in light.
It is used for "sugar free" baked products, so is heat stable.
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
ModoVincere is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 PM.