Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    Look! My Spine! RubenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Winter Springs, FL
    Posts
    539
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Anybody here is up-to-date with AMD CPUs?

    Last machines I built were based around the AMD Phenom II X6 1090t (black edition). You can still find it in some places but is getting expensive. Looks like AMD is not focusing on it anymore (shrugs, is a great CPU). The ones out there, I really have no idea how they compare against the 1090t. Anybody can give me some clues?

    PS: Yeah I know I can google, but I'm bored and wanna chat/post.
    "Hoy es un dia normal, pero yo voy a hacerlo intenso" ~ Juanes

  2. #2
    Look! My Spine! RubenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Winter Springs, FL
    Posts
    539
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It seems that the Phenom series is being replaces bt the A & FX. WIth the A series being the CPU+GPU Frankenstein, and the FX series being the new CPU line. Am I correct? FXs come in 4/6/8 cores.
    "Hoy es un dia normal, pero yo voy a hacerlo intenso" ~ Juanes

  3. #3
    Look! My Spine! RubenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Winter Springs, FL
    Posts
    539
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know this is a longshot... this place is a refuge for apple wuusies and intel brainwashed betherens.
    "Hoy es un dia normal, pero yo voy a hacerlo intenso" ~ Juanes

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    My Bikes
    Felt nine flow
    Posts
    559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like my amd fx series i have the 8 core fx darn thing can overclock to like 4400 mhz if i recall thats stable can go to 5000 but that was not stable the intel cpus seem to be beter unless u do video editing i got a great deal on mine is why i got it

  5. #5
    derailleurs are overrated bigbenaugust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    KIGX
    My Bikes
    2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, 2011 Windsor Shetland mini-velo, 2012 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno SSCX
    Posts
    1,689
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My netbook has a dual-core AMD C-50 in it, it is also CPU+GPU. It's the first AMD I've had since I got rid of my Shuttle box (which was an Athlon XP of some sort) back in '09.
    --Ben
    Carrboro Bike Coalition - putting the "bike" in "CARrboro" :)
    2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX
    Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014)
    Current Linux Usage (by machine): Arch: I Debian: II openSUSE: I

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    My Bikes
    Felt nine flow
    Posts
    559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbenaugust View Post
    My netbook has a dual-core AMD C-50 in it, it is also CPU+GPU. It's the first AMD I've had since I got rid of my Shuttle box (which was an Athlon XP of some sort) back in '09.
    o i recall them aint they the ones u can crush the cpu?

  7. #7
    derailleurs are overrated bigbenaugust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    KIGX
    My Bikes
    2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, 2011 Windsor Shetland mini-velo, 2012 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno SSCX
    Posts
    1,689
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by windhchaser View Post
    o i recall them aint they the ones u can crush the cpu?
    The Athlon? I did burn one up once by trying a new super-quiet fan that didn't speed up fast enough to match the CPU heating up. But I have never crushed a CPU.
    --Ben
    Carrboro Bike Coalition - putting the "bike" in "CARrboro" :)
    2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX
    Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014)
    Current Linux Usage (by machine): Arch: I Debian: II openSUSE: I

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Irving, TX
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    AMD has evolved themselves into a niche market- that of very low prices. If you have a very low budget then you can go with AMD. If you have a low budget and you have software that benefits from a lot of cores then you can go with AMD. Otherwise go with AMD.

    When my company started 11 years ago we bought new computers with AMD processors. Running Win98SE and Autocad 2000i they were very fast. 7 years ago we replaced them with new machines but still with AMD processors. Running WinXP and Autocad 2004 they were fast but not quite as fast. We ran them for 4 years and they were not keeping up with our newer software so I did more research and bought some new machines. I got interested in the latest Intel cpu's and built a new machine with a dual core intel processor. It was incredibly fast compared to the 4 year old AMD machine so I decided I had had my share of AMD cpu's.

    Here is an article that recommends different processor models depending on your budget and use:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...lock,3106.html

  9. #9
    Pwnerer Wordbiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Pagosa Springs, CO, USA
    My Bikes
    Road, MTB, Cruiser, Chopper, BMX
    Posts
    2,878
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why go second tier?
    Quote Originally Posted by ahsposo View Post
    Ski, bike and wish I was gay.

  10. #10
    Banned. ModoVincere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,626
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As long as the queries run and the browser browses I don't pay attention to the chip its run on.
    Sorry

  11. #11
    Senior Member tizeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    1985 Falcon, 2008 Jamis Dakota Sport
    Posts
    102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is the gaming CPU hierarcy chart. Glad to see my Core i7 2600 is still top tier.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ck,3106-5.html

    And here is another where you can choose the CPU
    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/2

    Both of those sites are great for research.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Irving, TX
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wordbiker View Post
    Why go second tier?
    I agree with that. There are a few small niches where an AMD processor might make sense but other than that Intel processors are usually the better choice.

    AMD has had a lot of fans over the years, maybe they like AMD or maybe they just hate Intel I don't know. I read toms hardware a lot and people are continually bashing Intel and talking about how the next AMD processor will be so much better. Toms builds test machines periodically and benchmarks them against each other. Due to all of the AMD fans that write to them occasionally they will include AMD chips in their test machines. I don't recall an instance in the past few years where the AMD machines performed anywhere close to the Intel machines. A person interested in AMD chips could go to that site and look up all of their old test builds and compare the benchmarks.

  13. #13
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,245
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tizeye View Post
    Here is the gaming CPU hierarcy chart. Glad to see my Core i7 2600 is still top tier.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ck,3106-5.html

    And here is another where you can choose the CPU
    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/2

    Both of those sites are great for research.
    that's actually a bit dated.

    i5-3570k and i7-3770k are #3 and #2, respectively.
    i7-3930k is #1

    AMD brings up the rear and has NOTHING to compete against i5-3570k and higher.

    The only reason to buy AMD, is if you have no money to buy a i5-3570k.

    Speaking of which, A10-5800k is quite competitive when compared to the similarly priced i3-3225, both of which are around $130~140 mark.

    There is a new Piledriver/Vishera FX series is coming out in a few days.
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...er_Online.html
    But it's unlikely that any of them will offer any competition to i5-3570k, when both are overclocked, at least, when it comes to games, if AMD's 2nd gen APU's overclocking potential are any indication.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  14. #14
    Powerful-Ugly Creature Greyryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    571
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bjtesch View Post
    I agree with that. There are a few small niches where an AMD processor might make sense but other than that Intel processors are usually the better choice.

    AMD has had a lot of fans over the years, maybe they like AMD or maybe they just hate Intel I don't know. I read toms hardware a lot and people are continually bashing Intel and talking about how the next AMD processor will be so much better. Toms builds test machines periodically and benchmarks them against each other. Due to all of the AMD fans that write to them occasionally they will include AMD chips in their test machines. I don't recall an instance in the past few years where the AMD machines performed anywhere close to the Intel machines. A person interested in AMD chips could go to that site and look up all of their old test builds and compare the benchmarks.
    I got into computers right around 1999/2000 when the first Athlons had come out, and were absolutely spanking Intel. I've been a bit of an AMD fanboy, since then. I don't much keep up on tech anymore, so when I build a new computer, I usually just go towards the fastest AMD CPU my budget will allow. That said, I usually build upper mid-range, not top end machines.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Burton
    When some wild eyed eight foot tall maniac grabs you by the throat and taps the back of your favorite head head against the barroom wall, and he looks crooked in the eye, and he ask you if ya paid your dues, you just stare that big sucker right back in the eye, and you remember what ol' Jack Burton always says at a time like that: "Have ya paid your dues, Jack?" "Yessir, the check is in the mail."

  15. #15
    Senior Member catonec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    burlington VT.
    Posts
    2,212
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    2 years ago I ditched my athlon fx60 for an I7. all the research I did told me to do this. I also abandoned the nivida video cards for the radeons based on current (at the time) performance comparisons.
    2010 Kestrel RT900SL, 800k carbon, chorus/record, speedplay, zonda
    1997 Trek ZX6000, 6061w/manitou spyder, xt/xtr, time atac

  16. #16
    Senior Member tizeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    1985 Falcon, 2008 Jamis Dakota Sport
    Posts
    102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ever since 'outgrowing' my 8086 Packard Hell, I have built every one on my PCs. Not certain what the 286 was but most have been on an AMD chip. Wife's still is, as is my laptop. My last build I switched to an i7 with high end Nvida GTX video card. Not that I am a gamer, but to handle video rendering with Adobe Premiere. AMD just wasn't up to the task, nor were their Radeon graphics, however, they do make good non-critical gaming machines. Video development puts whole different demands and Premier's Mercury playback engine is built around the Nvida chipset, GTX and higher, although you can fake it with lesser GT and GTS cards by editing a text file in the program.

    Replacing my 2 AMD computers? The jury is still out on Windows 8, and frankly the big square block interface turns me off. I may seriously consider Apple which I haven't owned since my original Apple II before the Packard Hell until my iPad last year. Time will tell there if Windows 8 will push me to Apple.

  17. #17
    Senior Member mikeybikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Edgewater, CO
    My Bikes
    Tons
    Posts
    2,871
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Back in the day, AMD used to have the best price/performance ratio. Now, not so much.
    My Bikes: 2009 Breezer Uptown EX | 1980 Miyata Six Ten | 1970 Hercules Three-Two-Speed
    Wife's Bikes: 2008 Globe City 7 | 1972ish Peugeot UO-18 (in progress)

  18. #18
    derailleurs are overrated bigbenaugust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    KIGX
    My Bikes
    2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, 2011 Windsor Shetland mini-velo, 2012 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno SSCX
    Posts
    1,689
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I miss my K6-III/400.
    --Ben
    Carrboro Bike Coalition - putting the "bike" in "CARrboro" :)
    2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX
    Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014)
    Current Linux Usage (by machine): Arch: I Debian: II openSUSE: I

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Irving, TX
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Greyryder View Post
    I got into computers right around 1999/2000 when the first Athlons had come out, and were absolutely spanking Intel.
    Those were the days when AMD was doing real well in the performance race. We bought new AMD machines for our office in 2000 or 2001 and I remember them being real fast. We replaced them 4 years later and the replacements weren't so good compared to Intel. It was sometime right after that that Intel took off in performance and passed AMD. AMD has not been able to keep up. I'm not an AMD fan anymore but I would like to see AMD do better so that they would provide reasonable competition for Intel.

    I remember the days when there were other companies with good competition for Intel, such as Cyrix. AMD was also a good competitor to Intel back then. Our office was using AMD 386DX-40 chips instead of Intel 386DX-33 chips.

  20. #20
    Look! My Spine! RubenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Winter Springs, FL
    Posts
    539
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bjtesch View Post
    Those were the days when AMD was doing real well in the performance race. We bought new AMD machines for our office in 2000 or 2001 and I remember them being real fast. We replaced them 4 years later and the replacements weren't so good compared to Intel. It was sometime right after that that Intel took off in performance and passed AMD. AMD has not been able to keep up. I'm not an AMD fan anymore but I would like to see AMD do better so that they would provide reasonable competition for Intel.

    I remember the days when there were other companies with good competition for Intel, such as Cyrix. AMD was also a good competitor to Intel back then. Our office was using AMD 386DX-40 chips instead of Intel 386DX-33 chips.
    I still remember their add on Computer Shopper.... "386DX-40, where no one has gone before".
    "Hoy es un dia normal, pero yo voy a hacerlo intenso" ~ Juanes

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Irving, TX
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RubenX View Post
    I still remember their add on Computer Shopper.... "386DX-40, where no one has gone before".
    In some ways those were the good old days. We were running MS-DOS which is extremely crude compared to Windows 7 but it ran very fast on a 386-DX40. The guys in my office were playing with Descent at lunch and it ran pretty well on the 386-DX40. That makes me laugh when I read about people needing quad core cpu's at 4GHz and $500 video cards in order to run current games that look barely better than Descent.

    And don't anybody give me any Apple crap- I was running Unix before I was running MS-DOS and to paraphrase my computer supplier- "Apple OS is just Unix with a clown suit on it".

  22. #22
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    25,763
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I am pretty happy with my new old box... Asus P5Q motherboard with an Intel quad core Q8200 running at 2.33ghz with 4 gigs of ram. Video is a 210 GeForce / 512 which replaced a faulty 1G video card and it's all good for what I do with the computer and I think the 1TB drive and 1TB external should cover my storage needs.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Irving, TX
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver View Post
    I am pretty happy with my new old box... Asus P5Q motherboard with an Intel quad core Q8200 running at 2.33ghz with 4 gigs of ram
    I'm running a Q9400 at 3.4GHz. When I built it I was able to get it to run stable at 3.8GHz. This was at the limit of my ram so I stopped right there. It might have gone higher but I don't think that chip should go much higher. I picked 3.4 as a good everyday number to run at. My work computer is a dual core E8500 and it has run 24/7 for over 3 years at 3.8GHz. What I do at home doesn't need nearly as much speed as I have. What I do at work sometimes needs 5 times the speed that I have. I will replace that machine as soon as economic conditions allow. Current Intel CPU's will achieve about twice the actual throughput as my E8500 at 3.8GHz. I think I can run an i7 at right at 5GHz and the chips' internal architectures are much more efficient too. I'm not running games so I have cheap video on the home machine and professional video on the work machine.

    I have a laptop that runs a dual core pentium at 1.6GHz and it is not really slow for most of what I do. I put an SSD in it and that helps a lot with its perceived speed.

  24. #24
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    25,763
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    My new old box was one of my nephew's old work machines but what he does (workwise) warrants computer power on a scale that most people would never need... the 64G was not fast enough so he doubled down and now runs 128.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •