Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Okanagan Valley, BC CANADA
    My Bikes
    Trek 7300FX, Lemond Sarthe
    Posts
    1,049
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    TIG or Fillet Brazing for my new frame?

    I am planning to have a new frame built and have yet to decide if I should have it TIG welded or go for fillet brazing.

    As far as I can tell from talking to people and hours spent on the internet, that fillet brazing (along with lug construction) was the best way to go years ago.

    But now days, TIG is lighter than fillet brazing, and TIG doesn't have the strength problems with air hardening tubing that welding used to have. I have been planning to go with Reynolds 731 or True temper OX which may be more appropriate for use with TIG.

    On the plus side for fillet brazing it makes for a smoother looking join, and maybe is stronger(?).

    Are there any other arguments in favor of fillet brazing that I should consider, seeing that it can cost $300 - $500 more than TIG.
    Last edited by bccycleguy; 07-14-08 at 08:13 PM.
    2006 Lemond Sarthe
    2000 Trek 7500FX

  2. #2
    Senior Member Nessism's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    My Bikes
    Homebuilt steel
    Posts
    2,324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless fillet brazed is an aesthetic you prefer, I'd go with TIG. There is less overall heat involved with TIG, which can reduce the amount of heat deformation and subsequent cold setting required. Overall, TIG is just a cleaner way to go in my view.
    Becareful buying/selling bike parts on-line. I learned the hard way. :(

    Good/Bad Trader Listing

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I build fillet braze bikes, so I am biased. I think TIG looks unfinished and boring. Fillet brazing is my favorite because you aren't limited by angles and tube diameters but you still get a very neat finished look.

    as far as deformation and coldsetting goes...it all depends on the builder. A good builder will know a process that will stop the frame from deforming or twisting with either joining process. I will usually check my frame after tacking to see if I need to pull a joint in a certain direction or keep it in place during brazing.

    either way, you will get an awesome bike. both ways are plenty strong if done correctly. ask you builder their opinion.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that if this came down to deciding between several builders the key thing would be to try to make the decision outside of the issue of how the tubes are joined. Aesthetics aside, the real ordering of joinery methods should probably be TIG, Fillet brazing, lug. Somehow it's all backwards. But so is deciding a bike on how the joints are made. Fit, getting the precise kind of bike you need, and your builder's experience should count for more.

    On aesthetics i think TIG is also superior, but you won't find too many who agree. The reason is that real art and craft values fingertips. Meaning the human trace left by the master. Like brushstrokes. Not to be confused with someone who can't cover his tracks due to poor workmanship. TIG leaves behind a certain fingertip impression of the builder, it can be perfectly smooth like Don from Anvil, or it can be various kinds of "dimes" (a good deal of it can also be the electronics of the machine). Even where it is perfectly smooth the fillets left behind seem to appeal to some as being too small, people like the beefy look. However these are the only real smooth fillets out there, right from the chraftsman's touch.

    While obviously brazing works great, it is hard to see the amount of heat required to build up the brass is an advantage, it's costly, increases your carbon footprint, heats the tubing a lot. But the aesthetic issue is they don't go raw. They file and sand the heck out of the stuff so that the end result is like bondo, no fingerprints. If bondo is what you want, why not bondo tig? I have some welds like that that have been out of doors summer and winter for 5 years and still are great, no lifting of the bondo, nice fat look.

    Another option with TIG is the tigged over layer of brass. Very light amps are used to melt brass over the weld to fair it in. Never see this on bikes, and I prefer the fingerprints, but for those who want the melted techique, that is a good part of what the brass is in the welding store is for... I don't expect people to agree, and do accept the beauty of the good conventional bike builder. But I have also been around the craft world a long time, and know what gets respect more broadly and what doesn't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •