Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-11-08, 01:07 PM   #1
facefirst
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Can Reynolds 853 be Chrome-Plated?

I have a 1998 Paramount that was built by Match out of Reynolds 853, and it's time to repaint it. I have considerable sentimental attachment to this particular bike.

I own older Paramounts that feature chromed lugs and stays, and I'd like to do the same with this frame. The alternatives - buying a $3K Waterford 953 frame or the $6K 70th Anniversary Paramount frame - are beyond my budget.

I sent an email to Curt Goodrich, one of original Match framebuilders, and he said he saw no reason why the stays and lugs couldn't be chromed. I've also seen sites from other framebuilders that show 853 frames with chromed chainstays. However, Waterford claims that chroming 853 compromises the tubing.

So, I throw the question to the experts - not the question of whether adding chrome aesthetics to the frame makes any sense, but whether it can be done without ruining the frame.
facefirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-08, 01:30 PM   #2
merlin55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 1,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dude, chrome is fine on steel frames. Not the best idea if you live and ride close to the ocean as it will eventually rust, but my 20 year Tomasini has chromed seat and chainstays and it looks nice.
merlin55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-08, 08:28 PM   #3
Live Wire 
Framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 537
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by facefirst View Post
So, I throw the question to the experts - not the question of whether adding chrome aesthetics to the frame makes any sense, but whether it can be done without ruining the frame.
You already asked one of THE experts!
Live Wire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-08, 08:09 AM   #4
facefirst
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Live Wire View Post
You already asked one of THE experts!
True - I should have said "other experts who care to comment." The question remains; Waterford says you shouldn't chrome 853, and others say it's no problem.
facefirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-08, 02:55 PM   #5
NoReg
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It would be a benefit if you told us why Waterford said 853 couldn't be chromed. I would put a lot of credit in their opinion if there was some kind of technical reason that others might not be aware of. If their reson were numerological it might detract from their opinion slightly.

I've never chromed a bike, but am I not right in saying that mostly the lugs get chromed, and any overlap might well be within the butts? The lugs aren't made of 853, and the butts are tougher than the rest of the tubing, any relief there?

Last edited by NoReg; 10-12-08 at 02:59 PM.
NoReg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-08, 06:26 PM   #6
facefirst
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterpan1 View Post
It would be a benefit if you told us why Waterford said 853 couldn't be chromed. I would put a lot of credit in their opinion if there was some kind of technical reason that others might not be aware of. If their reson were numerological it might detract from their opinion slightly.

I've never chromed a bike, but am I not right in saying that mostly the lugs get chromed, and any overlap might well be within the butts? The lugs aren't made of 853, and the butts are tougher than the rest of the tubing, any relief there?
Here's what Waterford says (at http://www.waterfordbikes.com/2005/d...n.php?qid=13):

More importantly, chrome cannot be used on heat treated steels such as True Temper OX Platinum, Reynolds 753 and 853. The plating process compromises the benefits of heat treatment. Plating also adds much more weight than paint.
facefirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-08, 07:22 PM   #7
NoReg
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks my connection is so slow, that would have taken me ages to fish for. Basically the only thing that is serious there is the compromise of HT. Durability of paint or corosion resistance are all problems in any high stress tubing.

There is a reason that stainless takes a big haircut in structures. It doesn't polish like chrome either.

I found quite a few examples of 853 that had been chromed. Still not sure whether the beef is Hydrogen embrittlement, or drawing the temper. The latter would not seem to be possible. But I don't really follow these super steels so I hope someone who does will jump in.
NoReg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-09, 04:57 PM   #8
crx7
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Iron Horse Victory is chromed, haven't had any problems with it so far.
crx7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-09, 10:32 PM   #9
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
mentioning the heat treat makes no sense. As far as I know, chrome doesn't involve heating the frame. Framebuilding and bike company owning do not necessarily qualify anyone to answer a technical question.

Having said that, I don't think it's a good idea. And I'm not particularly happy about that. What I do know about chrome is that poorly done chrome jobs mean a quick or slow death for the frame. Most American chrome shops don't do anything else that is like a bike. I've heard many reports of problems. In other countries there is much more expertise. You should find a shop that has experience with chroming bikes.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-09, 04:49 PM   #10
Revtor
I ride my bike
 
Revtor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 421
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Maybe shoot a tech question to Reynolds. Id love to hear the real deal answer.
Revtor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-09, 05:28 PM   #11
Fidelista
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
mentioning the heat treat makes no sense. As far as I know, chrome doesn't involve heating the frame. Framebuilding and bike company owning do not necessarily qualify anyone to answer a technical question.

Having said that, I don't think it's a good idea. And I'm not particularly happy about that. What I do know about chrome is that poorly done chrome jobs mean a quick or slow death for the frame. Most American chrome shops don't do anything else that is like a bike. I've heard many reports of problems. In other countries there is much more expertise. You should find a shop that has experience with chroming bikes.
Please correct me if I'm wrong on this, but would the issue be hydrgen embrittlement? As I understand the process, correcting hydrogen embrittlement after chroming involves heating. Might that heating process compromise the temper of the tubing?
Another thought..might Waterford be taking extra, and possibly unnecessary precautions on legal advice?
Fidelista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-09, 05:53 PM   #12
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've polished stainless to a chrome-like finish...
Six jours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-09, 06:36 PM   #13
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Six jours View Post
I've polished stainless to a chrome-like finish...
I'm thinking that tubing like Columbus XCR can be electro-polished. There is a Cinelli frame
that looks like they did that to it. The process is the opposite of chrome plating, you
use the frame as a cathode which removes the high spots. I have seen some
stainless where this was done, and it was pretty shiny.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-09, 07:12 AM   #14
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn
Posts: 6,705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by facefirst View Post
Here's what Waterford says (at http://www.waterfordbikes.com/2005/d...n.php?qid=13):

More importantly, chrome cannot be used on heat treated steels such as True Temper OX Platinum, Reynolds 753 and 853. The plating process compromises the benefits of heat treatment. Plating also adds much more weight than paint.
The answer is Hydrogen embrittlement: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_embrittlement Read the section called Process. Plating is mentioned as a culprit. Me thinks they are using CYA, cover your arse.
cs1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-09, 08:41 AM   #15
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,646
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
mentioning the heat treat makes no sense. As far as I know, chrome doesn't involve heating the frame.
"The plating process compromises the benefits of heat treatment."

Waterford is not saying that chrome plating involves heating the frame. They are saying that it compromises the heat treating benefits.

From what I gather, it appears that some frames made from 853 are not heat treated. That is, heat treating the frame is an optional (additional) step. Maybe, chrome-plated 853 hasn't been heat treated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
Framebuilding and bike company owning do not necessarily qualify anyone to answer a technical question.
I'd say that Waterford and Reynolds are clearly reasonable sources for technical answers. Both rely on doing things properly to maintain their reputations. It seems almost certain that Reynolds provides technical info to Waterford and Waterford talks to Reynolds about what building methods are appropriate.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-09, 08:16 PM   #16
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Did Reynolds offer an opinion? I would take anything I heard from Waterford or any other framebuilder with a grain of salt until I knew the source of the info. It doesn't take an engineer to build a frame. Of course, chroming one of their frames would absolve them of any further involvement with that frame. In fact, I might tell you the same thing about one of my frames, because juries have not been kind to manufacturers no matter what crazy modifications people make to their products.

It does appear that the last step in chrome plating is a heating cycle to approximately 400 degrees for the purposes of removing hydrogen. This would put it in the range that would probably affect the heat treatment. Hydrogen embrittlement is bad, but I don't think it makes much sense to say that it affects the heat treatment.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-09, 05:43 AM   #17
Falanx
THE Materials Oracle
 
Falanx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Finally... home :-)
Bikes: Univega Alpina 5.1 that became a 5.9, that became a road bike... DMR TrailStar custom build
Posts: 502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'll never understand the fascination with chromium plating steel. It's a corrosion nightmare, and while when perfect, it increases the fatigue life of a component just as any surface hardening treatment would, it's too frequently imperfect to warrant performing.

Right, to address a number of metallurgical considerations;

Hydrogen embrittlement - while it is true to say that the plating process releases hydrogen, and the temperatures involved encourage diffusion of hydrogen into the substrate where it collects over time at grain boundaries in the typical hydrogen embrittlement phenomenon in steels, all reputable plating shops perform a hydrogen bake-out as the final thermochemical step in the process to eliminate this deleterious behaviour.

It is not true to say that all steels suffer from hydrogen embrittlement when plated in an acid bath, nor do those that do suffer, to the same extent, but in essentially all cases, the substrate will be damaged. The diffusivity of hydrogen into a steel is based upon its crystal structure, and the degree of embrittlement on the (usually) inverse relationship between strength and remaining ductility in the substrate.

For reference, the bakeout needs to progress at no more than 250 degrees celsius, much less than 400 degrees, unless the figures you quote are in farenheit.

Heat Treatment - no presently used heat-treated/thermophilic/whatever you want to call it steel for bicycle frames is tempered or aged at 200-250 degrees celsius. That's spring-temper range, and as such, the steel would have unnacceptably low elongation to failure figures. They aren't tempered at just above that value either, as the 300 degree celsius area is also know as the temper embrittlement or blue brittleness zone, associated with the decomposition of martensite to free carbide and ferrite.

There is no technical reason why chromium plating of Reynolds 853 without associated hydrogen embrittlement or damage to the careful heat-treatent isn't practical and practicable when you approach it with sound materials science. What I'm more concerned about is the deleterious effect such a cathodic layer would have on the corrosion performance of the steel when compromised.

Last edited by Falanx; 05-07-09 at 06:05 AM.
Falanx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-09, 08:36 AM   #18
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
I don't feel like going back to look it up, but I believe that it was 400F. I'm not a steels geek, and it's been 25 years since I looked at a phase diagram for any steel alloy. My one and only experience with tempering steel was with O1 steel, and it turns a nice straw color at 450F, so something is going on (sorry about the technical terminology).
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48 AM.