Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Confusion about no-rake forks and handling

Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Confusion about no-rake forks and handling

Old 08-14-09, 11:21 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 64

Bikes: Raleigh Super Course (1968)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Confusion about no-rake forks and handling

Hi folks.

I'm learning about bike design - I'm way too new (and poor!) to be designing / building my own bike right now, but it's fun to pretend.

Anyway, I'm a little confused about forks with no rake (as in, 0 mm rake; not straight forks that have the rake set at the crown). People on BF and elsewhere online claim that no rake yields a twitchy bike or a bike with "poor" (by some standard) handling.

My reference is here, which is linked from Sheldon Brown's website (so it can't be all wrong!). He says,

For a given steering angle, offsetting the hub forward reduces trail, while offestting the hub backward increases trail. This may seem counterintuitive, since very stable cruiser bikes usually have more fork rake than twitchy track bikes. But the other factor at work is the angle of the steerer -- cruiser bikes have very slack head tubes, so they have more trail despite their fork rake, not because of it.
By that logic, a bike with no rake is more stable than a bike with rake, all other things being equal (which they never are). So are the BFers and other Internet denizens wrong? Or am I misinterpreting this?

Any information is appreciated!
intx13 is offline  
Old 08-14-09, 12:41 PM
  #2  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,489

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 57 Posts
Zero fork rake (offset) results in longer trail and sluggish handling.

Framebuilder Dave Moulton says in one of his blogs on rake and trail that for a road bike with a 73 degree head angle the optimum trail seems to be around 2 to 2 ½ inches (5 to 6.3cm.).

From the diagram below, you can see that zero rake on a bike with a 73 degree head tube angle and 700C x 25C tires, the trail would be a whopping 103.3 mm (10.33 cm).

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 08-14-09, 01:45 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 64

Bikes: Raleigh Super Course (1968)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the info Scooper. So a bike with no rake will have a strong centering force which makes it harder to turn (but easier to balance). That sounds like it would be good for a learner bike for kids, where the turns are going to be gentle and the main challenge is balance.
intx13 is offline  
Old 08-14-09, 03:10 PM
  #4  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
I think a lot of the incorrect "conventional wisdom" about rake got started when we used to use steeper angles and short rake on racing bikes. This thread reminded me I want to build an adjustable rake fork for experimenting with this.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 08-15-09, 12:36 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,059

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2180 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times in 332 Posts
Originally Posted by Scooper
Zero fork rake (offset) results in longer trail and sluggish handling.

Framebuilder Dave Moulton says in one of his blogs on rake and trail that for a road bike with a 73 degree head angle the optimum trail seems to be around 2 to 2 ½ inches (5 to 6.3cm.).
The huge majority of forks these days fall in the 40 - 45 mm range and only custom made frames tend to use anything beyond 47 mm. My personal frames have 72.5 degree head angle and a 45 mm fork. I've never seen a frame with a zero rake fork although I'm sure they are out there.
Nessism is offline  
Old 08-15-09, 02:55 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
It may seem that for a beginner, the slower the response, the better, but too slow is not safe, either. It's best to stay within the range of normal practice. Bikes today seem to have trail ranging from perhaps 65 mm (Mrs. Road Fan's hybrid bike) to around 20 mm (a builder here on BF used this for his own touring bike). It really doesn't take a big change in trail to make a significant difference in a bike's response.

You could make a bike with a negative rake, and get a LOT more trail. But what would it be good for?
Road Fan is offline  
Old 08-15-09, 03:34 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 151
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just as an aside...

I have had a couple of hipster fixie riding guys ask me to build them a fixed gear frame and fork, fork with zero rake and straight blades. My response was "no". I assume they wanted the fork for aesthetics and trend factor, and had no idea what that would mean in terms of handling.
calikid2006 is offline  
Old 08-15-09, 04:40 PM
  #8  
tuz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto/Montréal
Posts: 1,209

Bikes: Eight homemade, three very dusty

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
There is a builder in France that makes frames with 0 rake. Can't find the link sorry. The head angle is super steep (like 78*) to acheive normal trails. But as a result the stem is super short because of the necessary long TT. Was it 700c or 650c can't remember.

Edit: here it is... doesn't look so bad.

Last edited by tuz; 08-15-09 at 04:56 PM.
tuz is offline  
Old 08-15-09, 07:53 PM
  #9  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times in 2,497 Posts
traditional reason for zero rake forks is for doing tricks. I forget what the type of competition is called, but fixies with zero rake forks are required. Last video of this type of riding was actually a synchronized pair.

Video example

Last edited by unterhausen; 08-15-09 at 07:57 PM.
unterhausen is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.