Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-16-09, 04:26 PM   #1
meech151 
meech151
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain Home, AR
Bikes: MEECH road & cross bike
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Belt driven drivetrain

Is anyone familiar with these Carbon Drive belt systems? I have a customer who is considering this option and i am looking into it but I was wondering if anyone has experience with them, pros & cons, etc. Are they any more trouble than a regular chain driven setup, wear out faster, or harder to maintain, things as such. Any info is greatly appreciated. Thanks
meech151 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-09, 05:47 PM   #2
Allen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 4,752
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You have to make the drive side seat stay removable so one can replace the belt.
The belt cannot be separated like a chain can.
Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-09, 05:58 PM   #3
meech151 
meech151
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mountain Home, AR
Bikes: MEECH road & cross bike
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, I realized that from the website but what I was wondering is if this thing functions as smoothly as they advertise or is it a headache in disguise. Making an entrance for the belt is not my main concern, the main concern for me is if this thing functions well. I guess you could always convert it back to chain driven.
meech151 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-09, 06:45 PM   #4
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
I think the only difference from the framebuilder's viewpoint is the break in the frame for the belt. As you say, there is no reason you can't run a chain on a frame that is belt capable. There are some people that really say horrible things about the belt drive, I'm not sure where the truth lies. I'm still interested myself, although chain drive is hard to improve on. I'm still interested for commuting mostly.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-09, 08:11 PM   #5
NoReg
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I tried to get a carbon drive system for Rohloff, but gave in and got a chain system instead. Attitude amoung those who had tried it was that it had a high cool factor, but little real advantage, however, little real problem either. Slight higher resistence but not significant. All the usual problems with resupply that one might have with any unconventional product.
NoReg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-09, 01:07 PM   #6
Syscrush
Senior Member
 
Syscrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 737
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by meech151 View Post
Are they any more trouble than a regular chain driven setup, wear out faster, or harder to maintain, things as such. Any info is greatly appreciated. Thanks
Based on results in the motorcycle world, it would be less maintenance and less wear. No requirement to clean or lube it, and they last longer than chains.
Syscrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-11, 05:04 PM   #7
thebigkick
Senior Member
 
thebigkick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Bikes: 2008 Masi Speciale CX, 1966 Benotto
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
check out this link for an update to how belt drives are being done:

http://www.carbondrivesystems.com/fo...rs.php?lang=us

Last edited by thebigkick; 04-25-11 at 05:10 PM.
thebigkick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-11, 06:22 PM   #8
JonnyHK 
Senior Member
 
JonnyHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Bikes: Baum Romano, Colossi xCr, Homemade Bamboo!
Posts: 2,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I built up this commuter using a Lynskey 'Crosstown' frame that was on sale.

Belt is quiet, clean and maintenance free. It needed to be re-tensioned after the first 100km or so, but this was easy (ie loosen wheel, pull back, tighten).



Frame has a joint on the rear seatstay.

Braze on is not in an ideal location on chainstay for a neat/traditional cable routing for an IGH, hence loop of cable.

Versa 8 shifters go up well, but not so good shifting down. Not sure if this is the nature of the Nexus hub, my adjustment skills, or something to do with the shifter.

Brakes suck. Cantis were squeeky and lots of fork shudder. V-brakes are a bit weak at the moment as I don't have Travel Agents on them (on order). If the fork had a mount on it I would have put the cable guide there for the canti brakes. Disk would have been better, but frame not set up for that.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMGP0569.jpg (98.0 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg IMGP0571.jpg (99.9 KB, 47 views)
File Type: jpg IMGP0570.jpg (98.3 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg IMGP0565.jpg (94.2 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg IMGP0564.jpg (97.0 KB, 57 views)
JonnyHK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-11, 09:46 PM   #9
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In my very limited experience it's a neat idea, very smooth and silent, but with very noticeable resistance compared to a chain. It may have been that the belt on the one example I tried was too tight - it was very tight, but I was told that was normal - but if the level of resistance I noted was typical, then I would limit their application to upright city bikes where the rider just doesn't care. On any sort of performance bike, I would find it (spin the wheel by hand and watch it grind to a stop in a couple of revolutions) unacceptable.
Six jours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-11, 04:13 PM   #10
radshark
Psycholist
 
radshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Bikes: Devinci Amsterdam, Litespeed Teramo
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Motorcycles make use of both belt and chain drives. Most Harleys have belts - most sport bikes have chains.

Chain are usually more efficient - belt quieter and less maintenance and last much longer (x3-4). My next motorcycle will be belt...

For relaxed bicycling I think belts make a lot of sense. Not so much for racing ..

Cheers
radshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-11, 02:17 PM   #11
stryper
I just wanna ride
 
stryper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chico Califo
Bikes: 2013 BMC Impec
Posts: 1,153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
I like the comparision of the belt drive and this clean sort of bikes for
using in urban terrain. It is great to have such a silent drive while you
are making some funny, speedy or athletic stuff.
But talking about efficiency or acceleration on a pro level, I would think
a chain drive would be better.
(Thats why the Heidelberg is displayed under the rafael concepts label and
not under rafael sports)
For real track racing I choose the normal chain drive. It works perfect,
and nobody worries about dirty legs or trousers. And you have more choises
in transmission ratios (for the moment - they will produce a lot of new
sizes, I think)
I have made my own special pulley attachment.

Greets

rafael
That is an email I received from the maker of this bike. I had emailed him when the bike had first surfaced a few years back as I was thinking of trying to make my new build a belt drive.

For cost reasons I didn't, but since then I've also ridden a trek belt drive bike at the lbs. Didn't have my license with me, so only got to ride it around the store a few times. I felt no noticeable difference in the ride except the coasting which I'm not used to. The acceleration from 0 to like 10 (in a store remember) felt normal, the resistance seemed the same, it was quiet, it was dry (no lube).

I'd still like to build up a belt drive bike. Ideally I'll build a bamboo frame soon and put one on that. Even if there is no performance difference, it's novel and neat, and that is worth something at least to me.
stryper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-11, 03:53 PM   #12
Canaboo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm making a bamboo/wood belt drive mtb right now. I'll post some pics soon.
Canaboo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-11, 06:09 AM   #13
Thulsadoom
Senior Member
 
Thulsadoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gouverneur NY
Bikes: 2003 BIANCHI VIGORELLI, 2002 TREK 520, Schwinn Mesa WINTER BIKE
Posts: 1,257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenG View Post
You have to make the drive side seat stay removable so one can replace the belt.
.
I'm wondering how that would be done. Would it be a simple matter of cutting out a piece of the seat stay and making some sort of coupler? Would it be a screw together coupler? Or a sleeve of some sort?

I'd like to think I can take my current Trek 520 frame and do this modification (or have it done), in order to convert to a belt.

Anyone?
Thulsadoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-11, 02:34 AM   #14
radshark
Psycholist
 
radshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Bikes: Devinci Amsterdam, Litespeed Teramo
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wonder if a smaller variant of a S and S type connector could be fitted on the chain stay...
radshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-11, 04:51 AM   #15
mconlonx 
Nobody
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 7,090
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thulsadoom View Post
I'm wondering how that would be done. Would it be a simple matter of cutting out a piece of the seat stay and making some sort of coupler? Would it be a screw together coupler? Or a sleeve of some sort?

I'd like to think I can take my current Trek 520 frame and do this modification (or have it done), in order to convert to a belt.

Anyone?
I've seen one single S&S coupler on a seatstay -- undo it and simply spread the stay barely wide enough to get the belt through. Also, a couple different systems with some kind of bolt(s) holding the chainstay together at a break for the belt by the rear dropout.

I work in a Trek shop and have to deal with belt systems on a semi-regular business. Most of the issues are noise related -- people expect dead quiet, but if alignment or tension is off, there will be noise. PITA figuring various objectionable noises out and fixing them.

Also, frame flex is an issue. There's a couple of carbon SS Superfly 29ers with belt drive out there and users have had issues with belt slippage and belts coming off usually the rear cog under high torque situations.

Builders should also keep in mind that cogs and belt-rings are much wider than their chain drive counterparts which needs to be taken into account around places like the bb/drive side chainstay, especially considering alinment between front and rear cogs, i.e. belt-line has to be near perfect.

More headaches than benefits IMHO...
__________________
I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.

Last edited by mconlonx; 05-19-11 at 08:31 AM.
mconlonx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-11, 03:19 PM   #16
markmolloy1621
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just had my son build up my "Forever Bike" with Rohloff hub and Gates belt drive. just took deliver of it and so am anxious to try it out. it will be by ultimate commuter bike. http://pushingthepedals.com/2011/05/18/dads-new-bike/
markmolloy1621 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-11, 03:50 PM   #17
radshark
Psycholist
 
radshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Bikes: Devinci Amsterdam, Litespeed Teramo
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The other approach could be to figure out a way of mounting the rear cog on the outside of the stay. Different frame design. Also requires different rear hub components.
radshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 05:56 AM   #18
Thulsadoom
Senior Member
 
Thulsadoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gouverneur NY
Bikes: 2003 BIANCHI VIGORELLI, 2002 TREK 520, Schwinn Mesa WINTER BIKE
Posts: 1,257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mconlonx View Post
I've seen one single S&S coupler on a seatstay -- undo it and simply spread the stay barely wide enough to get the belt through. Also, a couple different systems with some kind of bolt(s) holding the chainsgay together at a break for the belt by the rear dropout.

I work in a Trek shop and have to deal with belt systems on a semi-regular business. Most of the issues are noise related -- people expect dead quiet, but if alignment or tension is off, there will be noise. PITA figuring various objectionable noises out and fixing them.

Also, frame flex is an issue. There's a couple of carbon SS Superfly 29ers with belt drive out there and users have had issues with belt slippage and belts coming off usually the rear cog under high torque situations.

Builders should also keep in mind that cogs and belt-rings are much wider than their chain drive counterparts which needs to be taken into account around places like the bb/drive side chainstay, especially considering alinment between front and rear cogs, i.e. belt-line has to be near perfect.

More headaches than benefits IMHO...
Thank you for that post Mconlonx!
Thulsadoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 06:00 AM   #19
Thulsadoom
Senior Member
 
Thulsadoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gouverneur NY
Bikes: 2003 BIANCHI VIGORELLI, 2002 TREK 520, Schwinn Mesa WINTER BIKE
Posts: 1,257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by radshark View Post
The other approach could be to figure out a way of mounting the rear cog on the outside of the stay. Different frame design. Also requires different rear hub components.
Hmmm. That's a thought for a design frame engineer. If they could create a wheel/hub and frame that works together, almost like the rear frame member clamp onto and hold a caged bearing and the axle could spin inside with the rear cog outside of the stay? Maybe really narrow stays? Out of my league though...
Thulsadoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 06:12 AM   #20
raceline
Senior Member
 
raceline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by meech151 View Post
Yeah, I realized that from the website but what I was wondering is if this thing functions as smoothly as they advertise or is it a headache in disguise. Making an entrance for the belt is not my main concern, the main concern for me is if this thing functions well. I guess you could always convert it back to chain driven.
Belt drive in my opinion sucks !!!! may i say NOISE and slippage , bout a 2011 district carbon went to a chain drive & now perfect ( no wonder the chain is well over 100 years old ) Trek was nothing but good in helping me they tried everything and included new everything as far as drivetrain to try to fix it
Attached Images
File Type: jpg district 001.jpg (96.7 KB, 28 views)
raceline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 06:39 AM   #21
mudboy
Senior Member
 
mudboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Collegeville, PA
Bikes: Ruckelshaus Randonneur, Specialized Allez (early 90's, steel), Ruckelshaus Path Bomber currently being built
Posts: 1,354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thulsadoom View Post
Hmmm. That's a thought for a design frame engineer. If they could create a wheel/hub and frame that works together, almost like the rear frame member clamp onto and hold a caged bearing and the axle could spin inside with the rear cog outside of the stay? Maybe really narrow stays? Out of my league though...
It'd be easier to build the frame with elevated chainstays:

mudboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 02:12 PM   #22
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 18,796
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Yes, ad an EBB or sliding dropout to one of those elevated chainstay things,
and It would be simpler..

even like the Alpine Stars frames, they only elevated the drive-side ..

and yes S and S machine shop does make small diameter connectors.
there are several other ways people have managed the split.


personally I would like to see a covered drive train, in the Dutch tradition,
one of stretched truck tarp on a wire frame.
covering the Belt drive,
since they still would eat trouser legs, so covering them fixes that .

and a covered chain drive, out of sight out of mind, rarely gets oiled.

If the Belt drive were hidden It could be ignored , to no problem.

but its still in the gee whiz look at what I did stage now

maybe as a mature technology the practical will begin to adopt the parts.

Last edited by fietsbob; 05-19-11 at 02:22 PM.
fietsbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 05:36 PM   #23
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by markmolloy1621 View Post
I just had my son build up my "Forever Bike" with Rohloff hub and Gates belt drive. just took deliver of it and so am anxious to try it out. it will be by ultimate commuter bike. http://pushingthepedals.com/2011/05/18/dads-new-bike/
My mind is made up re. the belt drive, but I am interested in hearing how the Rohloff works out.
Six jours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-11, 07:19 PM   #24
JonnyHK 
Senior Member
 
JonnyHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Bikes: Baum Romano, Colossi xCr, Homemade Bamboo!
Posts: 2,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Some links for sliding, Rohloff compatible dropouts etc that you could use.

http://blog.ahrensbicycles.com/2009/...onversion.html
http://www.paragonmachineworks.com/s...-261333-2.aspx
JonnyHK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-11, 06:51 PM   #25
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm almost done with my Rohloff frame, using the Paragon drops. Just waiting for the wheel to get here so I can get the bridges the right distances for fenders.
Six jours is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 PM.