Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Metallic or Flamboyant hardiness?

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Metallic or Flamboyant hardiness?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-09, 03:00 AM
  #1  
imi
aka Timi
Thread Starter
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,240

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
Metallic or Flamboyant hardiness?

I searched for this but couldn't come up with a clear answer...

I'm about to order a new frame (a Bob Jackson World Tour). There are two colors which would be fine, one "metallic", the other "flamboyant".

Is there any advantage of the one over the other for hardiness... I'll be doing fully loaded touring, so the bike will get knocked about a bit and put in planes, busses etc. It's not important to me that it stays "pristine" but would the paint job make a difference?

Or would "enamel" be even better?

Thanks!
imi is offline  
Old 12-30-09, 08:27 AM
  #2  
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Liked 1,916 Times in 656 Posts
The paints used in the UK are traditionally different than the ones used here in the States. A British "flamboyant" is what we call a "candy". This is when translucent top coats get there sparkle effect from the glitters in the undercoat (which is often silver but can be other colors for different effects). A metallic color has the glitter in the color coat itself. What this means in terms of hardness is that the flamboyant paint has more layers that have a greater chance of separating if they are struck by something like a sharp rock. There isn't usually a lot of difference but there is some difference. A standard enamel is just paint without the silver flakes that would turn it into a metallic color so there would be no difference in hardness between the two.

The paint Americans use are typically polyurethane (or urethane) enamels that harden by chemical action when mixed with an activator. The "stove enamels" that were the traditional paints used in England harden by heating them in ovens (stoves) after spraying. Bob Jackson used to entirely use stove enamels years ago when I was learning to build frames about 15 miles away at Ellis Briggs. I don't know if they have now incorporated polyurethane enamel paints into their options.

Stove enamels were a tough paint and not necessarily more likely to chip than modern paints. I've seen many classic frames whose paint jobs have endured well over time.

In the States a candy paint job is more fragile. House of Kolor is a common supplier of glamour paints and sometimes gets a bad rap as not being durable. Often this is because the painter did not follow an exact time line of when different coats needed to be applied. If for example he waited too long between coats they won't adhere as well together.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Old 12-30-09, 10:05 AM
  #3  
imi
aka Timi
Thread Starter
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,240

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
Wow! thank you so much for your reply Doug... exactly the information I was looking for

Might aswell throw another out there... I'll be ordering the frame "blind" but do the paints have some kind of "standard colour numbering" so I could check it out here if BJ told me which number it was? Sort of like the Pantone thing in printing... It's hard to get the right impression from the photos on their webpage.

Thanks again
imi is offline  
Old 12-30-09, 12:10 PM
  #4  
shut up and ride
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: noho
Posts: 1,947

Bikes: supersix hi-mod,burley duet tandem,woodrup track,cannondale cross,specialized road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
powdercoating would be best option for toughness, but i don't know if they offer that at bob jackson
zzzwillzzz is offline  
Old 12-30-09, 12:17 PM
  #5  
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Liked 1,916 Times in 656 Posts
Unfortunately the only way to tell the real effect of paint colors is by looking at them in person. As a matter of fact when looking at some candy colors or pearls, it is very important what kind of light you are in. Natural sunlight (with the sun shinning on it. Cloudy daylight doesn’t show depth and sparkles the same way) is the best followed by incandescent light. Halogen lights work too. Florescent lighting gives a completely different effect. A candy color will look all washed out without any sparkle if seen under those conditions. The roundness of a tube makes the way light reflects off of it different than looking at chips on a color chart. This also reminds me that color charts often don’t match a real paint job either – especially reds. They are lighter in real life.

Most builder/painters keep a section of painted tubes as samples of what to choose. I’ve got many right here by my desk. That way one can see what is different about a pearl vs. a metallic. I think I remember such a group at Jackson's.

If you know what kind of paint is being used, you can go to a auto paint supply store that sells that paint and look at their color charts to get some idea of what to choose. For example somebody in the bigger cities will be selling House of Kolor paints and you can ask to see their charts. They will be amused/annoyed by your explanation of why you want to do this and you don’t want to buy anything from them.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Old 12-31-09, 05:39 AM
  #6  
imi
aka Timi
Thread Starter
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,240

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
Thanks for your replies once again!

Colours are always a problem if you can't see them in real life... maybe I'll just go for "Orange enamel" rather than "Amber flamboyant" or "Apricot metallic"... don't think I could go wrong with that

Happy New Year everyone!
imi is offline  
Old 12-31-09, 07:14 AM
  #7  
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Liked 1,916 Times in 656 Posts
The only thing I'd add to your last comment is that customers will almost always pick a flam over a metallic (by 75% to 25% I'd guess) and a metallic over a standard color. However, it is much easier to touch up a solid color and very difficult to do any kind of paint repair on a candy if it gets chipped. Of course this isn't a group decision, only you have to like your choice. And it doesn't have to be just one color, Bob Jackson has multi color options.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Old 12-31-09, 07:25 AM
  #8  
imi
aka Timi
Thread Starter
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,240

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times in 99 Posts
I started off planning on going over to england to be fitted for a BJ custom frame, but realised the off-the-peg frame will do just fine, so in the spirit of keeping it simple and easy I'm thinking the solid colour will be most "predictable", and, as you pointed out Doug, easier to touch up. Repairability, and even replaceability (are those real words?) are in my opinion important aspects...
imi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speedfish
Bicycle Mechanics
7
10-05-17 09:51 AM
KenNC
Classic & Vintage
16
08-25-17 01:19 AM
Craptacular8
Classic & Vintage
10
05-06-17 12:15 PM
kroozer
Framebuilders
27
05-23-12 07:12 PM
fusilierdan
General Cycling Discussion
6
04-22-11 01:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.