Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Bike Commuter
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Weird frame structure, need possible reasons

    I'm thinking of buying a Gravity Avenue C, but I'm puzzled by the weird frame structure in the back. Why don't the two triangles match up (highlighted in yellow)?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you're asking for a justification of that? I dunno, maybe they wanted to ensure there were warranty returns.

  3. #3
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    14,012
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think the mismatch is structurally significant. My guess is that the rear triangle was tooled with certain angles and is used on different size frames. On a taller frame it will hit the seat tube a little short of the top tube. Or.... the designer just designed it that way. If that was such a big deal, step-through frames would fail all the time, but they don't.

    I wouldn't worry about it.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  4. #4
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it's not that uncommon among production bikes. Since there is no reinforcement of the seat tube/top tube junction, the seat tube is probably heavy enough to take the load at the seat stays without crumpling. If it was a lightweight steel frame, I would question the builder's judgement.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,974
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The bottom line is that it's just a marketing hook. It's designed to catch your eye. The maker may or may not try to justify it as "better". In reality it's a gimmick and most likely harmless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina View Post
    how can a homophobe be gay, too? Does that mean you or choc ful of self loathing because, if I'm right, that would explain a lot.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the posts so far, though that kind of denial of the importance of details applies to a lot of custom frames also. What is the role of the Fleur du Lis on the lugs kinda stuff. Or the lugs.

    In general that kind of thing looks intended to soften the rear end, and harden the front end. Why that would appeal in this case could just come down to marketing hooks as mentioned. Or it can be that for some reason they tried it, and for whatever reson that particular bike worked great. Like going into a shop and riding three seemingly identical bikes, and yet one feels alive and the rest are like riding a section of guard rail.

    Why a deeply ovalized and curved tube. Sorta nets out at higher weight.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •