Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-10, 09:30 AM   #1
Bike Commuter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 49
Weird frame structure, need possible reasons

I'm thinking of buying a Gravity Avenue C, but I'm puzzled by the weird frame structure in the back. Why don't the two triangles match up (highlighted in yellow)?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg avenue_c_blk2100..jpg (93.2 KB, 89 views)
plutonium83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-10, 10:23 AM   #2
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 14,482
you're asking for a justification of that? I dunno, maybe they wanted to ensure there were warranty returns.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-10, 10:32 AM   #3
You gonna eat that?
Doohickie's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Posts: 14,320
I don't think the mismatch is structurally significant. My guess is that the rear triangle was tooled with certain angles and is used on different size frames. On a taller frame it will hit the seat tube a little short of the top tube. Or.... the designer just designed it that way. If that was such a big deal, step-through frames would fail all the time, but they don't.

I wouldn't worry about it.
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.

Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-10, 11:18 AM   #4
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 14,482
it's not that uncommon among production bikes. Since there is no reinforcement of the seat tube/top tube junction, the seat tube is probably heavy enough to take the load at the seat stays without crumpling. If it was a lightweight steel frame, I would question the builder's judgement.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-10, 07:10 PM   #5
Six jours
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
The bottom line is that it's just a marketing hook. It's designed to catch your eye. The maker may or may not try to justify it as "better". In reality it's a gimmick and most likely harmless.
Six jours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-10, 12:36 PM   #6
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,117
I agree with the posts so far, though that kind of denial of the importance of details applies to a lot of custom frames also. What is the role of the Fleur du Lis on the lugs kinda stuff. Or the lugs.

In general that kind of thing looks intended to soften the rear end, and harden the front end. Why that would appeal in this case could just come down to marketing hooks as mentioned. Or it can be that for some reason they tried it, and for whatever reson that particular bike worked great. Like going into a shop and riding three seemingly identical bikes, and yet one feels alive and the rest are like riding a section of guard rail.

Why a deeply ovalized and curved tube. Sorta nets out at higher weight.
NoReg is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.