Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Newbie tortoro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    The right tubing for the right girth.

    I'm looking to purchase an older steel racing road frame. I'm 5'11" weigh 185-90 lbs. Is Columbus SL too light for me? Which tubing would best support my weight without flex? This question could be applied to Reynold and Tange as well. Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks!

  2. #2
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Flex is overblown as a criteria, particularly for steel frames. You might be happier with one of the OS tubing sets depending on how strong you are. SL will work fine.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bobbycorno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,545
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
    Flex is overblown as a criteria, particularly for steel frames. You might be happier with one of the OS tubing sets depending on how strong you are. SL will work fine.
    Yep. In fact, a frame that's too stiff can be worse than one that's on the flexy side. Not only will the ride be needlessly harsh, but a lot of folks (yours truly included) contend that such a frame will feel sluggish and fatiguing to ride.

    SP
    Bend, OR

  4. #4
    Newbie tortoro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Flex is overblown as a criteria, particularly for steel frames. You might be happier with one of the OS tubing sets depending on how strong you are. SL will work fine.
    Forgive my ignorance, but which frames were made with OS tubing?

    best,
    vc

    Toronto

  5. #5
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tortoro View Post
    Forgive my ignorance, but which frames were made with OS tubing?

    best,
    vc

    Toronto
    OS (oversized) tubing debuted around 1990. The way to tell if a specific frame uses OS or "standard" size tubing is to measure the tubing diameter with a caliper.

    Standard Tubing: Top Tube = 25.4mm, Seat Tube = 28.6mm, Down Tube = 28.6mm

    OS Tubing: Top Tube = 28.6mm, Seat Tube = 28.6mm, Down Tube = 31.8mm
    - Stan

  6. #6
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say that SL would be just fine. I rode an SL bike until recently, and I have ridden it when I weighed upwards of 220 pounds.
    Last edited by unterhausen; 06-21-10 at 02:13 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member FROryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    My Bikes
    83 Marinoni, 91 Yeti FRO, 2000 Litespeed Blueridge, 94 Serotta legendTi, 2010 Curt Goodrich Sportif.
    Posts
    94
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tortoro View Post
    I'm looking to purchase an older steel racing road frame. I'm 5'11" weigh 185-90 lbs. Is Columbus SL too light for me? Which tubing would best support my weight without flex? This question could be applied to Reynold and Tange as well. Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks!
    Not a builder but I'm the same height and weight, my '85 Gios Torino constructed with regular dia. Columbus SL was way too flexy. Sunday ride bike only, impossible to sprint and climb due to the ghost shifting to a higher gear when putting the power to the pedal. Very comfy compared to my Marinoni Special built with SP. Can't comment on frames built with OS, never rode one.
    “Shoot low; they’re riding Shetlands!”
    -Zappa

  8. #8
    Decrepit Member Scooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Francisco California
    My Bikes
    Waterford 953 RS-22
    Posts
    8,806
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Because SL was so flexy when used on larger frames (~58cm and bigger), many framebuilders used a mix of SL and SP on larger frames, typically with SP down tubes and seat tubes. Schwinn did this on the mid-to-late eighties Waterford built Paramounts before they went to True Temper OS tubing in 1989.
    - Stan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •