Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-10, 03:38 PM   #1
tortoro
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
tortoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The right tubing for the right girth.

I'm looking to purchase an older steel racing road frame. I'm 5'11" weigh 185-90 lbs. Is Columbus SL too light for me? Which tubing would best support my weight without flex? This question could be applied to Reynold and Tange as well. Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks!
tortoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-10, 04:39 PM   #2
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,661
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Flex is overblown as a criteria, particularly for steel frames. You might be happier with one of the OS tubing sets depending on how strong you are. SL will work fine.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-10, 04:53 PM   #3
bobbycorno
Senior Member
 
bobbycorno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
Flex is overblown as a criteria, particularly for steel frames. You might be happier with one of the OS tubing sets depending on how strong you are. SL will work fine.
Yep. In fact, a frame that's too stiff can be worse than one that's on the flexy side. Not only will the ride be needlessly harsh, but a lot of folks (yours truly included) contend that such a frame will feel sluggish and fatiguing to ride.

SP
Bend, OR
bobbycorno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-10, 08:26 AM   #4
tortoro
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
tortoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Flex is overblown as a criteria, particularly for steel frames. You might be happier with one of the OS tubing sets depending on how strong you are. SL will work fine.
Forgive my ignorance, but which frames were made with OS tubing?

best,
vc

Toronto
tortoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-10, 08:42 AM   #5
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,224
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tortoro View Post
Forgive my ignorance, but which frames were made with OS tubing?

best,
vc

Toronto
OS (oversized) tubing debuted around 1990. The way to tell if a specific frame uses OS or "standard" size tubing is to measure the tubing diameter with a caliper.

Standard Tubing: Top Tube = 25.4mm, Seat Tube = 28.6mm, Down Tube = 28.6mm

OS Tubing: Top Tube = 28.6mm, Seat Tube = 28.6mm, Down Tube = 31.8mm
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.
Scooper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-10, 01:58 PM   #6
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,661
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
I would say that SL would be just fine. I rode an SL bike until recently, and I have ridden it when I weighed upwards of 220 pounds.

Last edited by unterhausen; 06-21-10 at 02:13 PM.
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-10, 04:03 PM   #7
FROryder
Senior Member
 
FROryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Bikes: 83 Marinoni, 91 Yeti FRO, 2000 Litespeed Blueridge, 94 Serotta legendTi, 2010 Curt Goodrich Sportif.
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tortoro View Post
I'm looking to purchase an older steel racing road frame. I'm 5'11" weigh 185-90 lbs. Is Columbus SL too light for me? Which tubing would best support my weight without flex? This question could be applied to Reynold and Tange as well. Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks!
Not a builder but I'm the same height and weight, my '85 Gios Torino constructed with regular dia. Columbus SL was way too flexy. Sunday ride bike only, impossible to sprint and climb due to the ghost shifting to a higher gear when putting the power to the pedal. Very comfy compared to my Marinoni Special built with SP. Can't comment on frames built with OS, never rode one.
FROryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-10, 06:00 PM   #8
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,224
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Because SL was so flexy when used on larger frames (~58cm and bigger), many framebuilders used a mix of SL and SP on larger frames, typically with SP down tubes and seat tubes. Schwinn did this on the mid-to-late eighties Waterford built Paramounts before they went to True Temper OS tubing in 1989.
__________________
- Stan
I'm with her.
Scooper is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM.