Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Frame Size and Tube Angles

Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Frame Size and Tube Angles

Old 07-29-10, 10:48 AM
  #1  
Longing for a Tail Wind
Thread Starter
 
Stickney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: I wish I were in South Dakota
Posts: 461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Frame Size and Tube Angles

I am not a frame builder, but realized that perhaps this was a better forum than the road bike area to pose this question.

I have a question on comparing different frames' geometry -- would appreciate some guidance.

I have a bit of confusion in how to analyze top tube length in relation to seat tube and head tube angles. Here are three frames, what differences in fit would I need to take into consideration for each frame? Any guidance/explanation on how to analyze these variable would be really appreciated. Thanks!

Frame 1:
Top Tube = 59 cm
Seat Tube Angle = 72.5
Head Tube Angle = 73

Frame 2:
Top Tube = 59 cm
Seat Tube Angle = 73
Head Tube Angle = 73.5

Frame 3:
Top Tube = 58 cm
Seat Tube Angle = 72.5
Head Tube Angle = 72
Stickney is offline  
Old 07-29-10, 06:46 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
On my frame size the difference between 72 in the seat and 73 is 1/4 inch, if I recall correctly. So the seat tube angles are pretty much a wash since they could be adjusted out if one was starting from median settings. The head tube angles are not going to have much effect on fit here, except to start the bars a tiny fraction fore or aft. As far as non-custom frames are concerned these are all pretty much within a stem size, so you can pretty much ignore them.

So one would expect Frame 2 to have the longest top tube reach, then Frame 1, then Frame 3. Assuming that the seat tube lengths are the same, the seat position/seatpost offset are adjusted to yield the same over the pedals position for each frame. You could adjust away these differences because they are minor in the world of off the peg bikes. That is not the same thing as saying these are minor position adjustments, just that it ought to be possible to work with them.

Get a free 2 D cad program. Learn to do simple sketches, where you center a radius on your BB for seat tube length, then make a line representing ST angle, then repeat from the intersection for top tube angles and lengths. you can import frame photos and lay geometry over them, then compare to your stock drawings by overlaying different frames. You will quickly see what constitute major and minor changes.
NoReg is offline  
Old 07-30-10, 07:48 AM
  #3  
Longing for a Tail Wind
Thread Starter
 
Stickney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: I wish I were in South Dakota
Posts: 461
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks Peterpan1 -- that is very helpful!
Stickney is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
antontoni
Framebuilders
8
10-24-17 05:32 AM
Regulatori
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
3
02-20-16 01:00 PM
ChucklesKY
Road Cycling
3
12-13-11 09:15 PM
Stickney
Road Cycling
5
07-30-10 08:35 PM
velikigrizli
Road Cycling
8
05-18-10 10:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.