Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Hope anybody could explain me this...

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Hope anybody could explain me this...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-11, 06:32 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Hope anybody could explain me this...

Ok i been having this doubt for zillions of years and I need somebody to explain it to me ok?

This is the deal...

For example, steel frame with 73 degrees st angle, front tube 73 degrees also. Now, of you make an imaginary line (parallel to the ground and tt) between the rear and front dropouts, the intersection with the seat tube with this imaginary line has a different angle, not 73 degrees, lets say 72.8 or whatever... why is that??? Anybody knows the reason?

By geometry it should be the same angle, opposite angles between parallel lines, but looks like in bikes is not like that, anybody?

Thanks.
ultraman6970 is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 06:44 PM
  #2  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
with older "horizontal" dropouts, the rear dropout height could vary depending on the wheel position. If the fork was replaced, that could vary the effective ht/st angles. I can't think of any other thing other than some sort of construction error. I'm sure there are plenty of bikes out there with issues along those lines, it's easy to do.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 06:56 PM
  #3  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
The baseline is a line through the centers of the rear dropout and the front fork dropout. Everything is relative to that baseline (STA, HTA, BB drop). If the rear dropout is "horizontal" similar to the Campy 1010, the wheel axle can be above the baseline if it's positioned at the rear of the dropout, or below the baseline if it's positioned at the forward end of the dropout. Similarly, if the fork is longer or shorter, or has a different headset than the frame designer assumed while designing the frame, the fork dropout could be higher or lower than the designed baseline. Slight changes in where the baseline is (as opposed to where it should be according to the design) will change the angles of the seat tube and head tube relative to the ground since the actual baseline is no longer parallel to the ground.

EDIT - unterhausen beat me to it.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 07:24 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm asking because a builder told me this centuries ago and now looking to some geometry draws the baseline and the tt/st angles are effectively different...

for example the 1973 raleigh professional track frame... a classic..



The seat tube angle is 73.3 and the other angle is 74... so this has something to do with the BB height then? as higher the BB shell the bigger the angle.

This is from where i got this...

https://www.classiclightweights.co.uk...ack1-large.JPG
ultraman6970 is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 07:54 PM
  #5  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
I have no idea why they would do that, but the top tube isn't level. Maybe to lower the handlebars, or maybe because they messed up and didn't feel like fixing the drawing.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 08:01 PM
  #6  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
In your drawing, the top tube is not parallel to the baseline, so the top tube-to-head tube angle and the top tube-to-seat tube angle will not be the same as the head tube-to-baseline angle (HTA) and seat tube-to-baseline angle (STA). The frame in your drawing has parallel head tube and seat tube (both are 74 degrees from the baseline).

The BB drop is the vertical distance from the baseline to the center of the BB shell. The BB height will depend on what size wheels and tires you use.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 08:33 PM
  #7  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
as the wheel is moved back in that dropout, the tt will get closer to horizontal
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-10-11, 08:59 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Hmm... dudes it is so odd... for example i have this other drawing from another place, same situation, in this case the bb is lower tho...

here... https://www.velomine.com/lugtrkframegeo.html

If the tt is not parallel to the base line then the st/tt and tt/ht should be different, not equal, m'i wrong?
ultraman6970 is offline  
Old 05-11-11, 03:35 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would guess it's related to the fork offset. A proper parallelogram exists between the TT, ST, Steerer, and your imaginary line. When you offset the fork perpendicular to the steering axis, you raise up your imaginary line just a bit.
guywithchickens is offline  
Old 05-11-11, 06:16 AM
  #10  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
Originally Posted by ultraman6970
If the tt is not parallel to the base line then the st/tt and tt/ht should be different, not equal, m'i wrong?
as long as the HT/ST are parallel, the st/tt and ht/tt angle have to be equal. As the predominance of slanted top tube bikes shows, there is no significance to the top tube angle to the ground. The steering geometry of the frame is determined by the fork rake and head angle and wheelbase. Everything else about the geometry is there to hold the rider off of the wheels.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-12-11, 05:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks
ultraman6970 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andrew R Stewart
Framebuilders
12
12-06-18 04:55 PM
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
28
03-27-18 03:58 PM
Altimis
Framebuilders
8
11-11-16 09:12 PM
markk900
Classic & Vintage
9
08-26-14 10:55 AM
sloar
Classic & Vintage
3
06-09-14 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.