Columbus Spirit and Reynolds 725 Durability
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 241
Bikes: Wilier Izoard, Tricross FG
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Columbus Spirit and Reynolds 725 Durability
How much durability am I sacrificing by going from 725 to Spirit?
I'm looking for my first steel frame, and of course would like something light and stiff. However, I've read a lot about Spirit being too thin and fragile - I already have a CF frame to take care of that . The two bikes I'm looking at have the same geometry and about a ~1.3lb weight difference between them.
Are there any other pros/cons I should be considering?
I'm looking for my first steel frame, and of course would like something light and stiff. However, I've read a lot about Spirit being too thin and fragile - I already have a CF frame to take care of that . The two bikes I'm looking at have the same geometry and about a ~1.3lb weight difference between them.
Are there any other pros/cons I should be considering?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,075
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,859 Times
in
2,307 Posts
1.3 pounds... Do you poop before you ride? Carry a full wallet? Andy
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: EagleRiver AK
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 60 Times
in
33 Posts
Assuming two steel bikes with equal tube diameters and that the weight difference is just due to tube thickness, the heavier frame would be stiffer. Too light of a steel bike and/or with too small diameter of tubes will be a flexible noodle.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: River City, OR
Posts: 672
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If the bike has been designed properly with regard to the materials used, rider weight and intended usage- probably no sacrifice in durability.
You didn't provide quite enough info though. 1.3# is a huge difference in frame weight in a good quality steel frame which should come in at 3 to 3 1/2, maybe 4 pounds. There is some obvious difference- like maybe one is lugged and the other isn't? Check wall thickness too. I can tell you this... compare frame weights with main tubes of .7mm-.5mm, with ones of .9mm-.8mm, and there ain't 1.3 pounds difference unless the frame is "really" huge. LOL
You probably need to do a little homework. Weight? 1.3# is significant in the frame alone. A full third heavier (assuming the lighter one is 3#). At the end of the day? Nothing. You could take either frame and depending on your component choice and build a bike that weighs in at 15-16 pounds if you're a weight weenie. If your not and don't want to spend the buck on light weight components then the difference is even less meaningful.
Like Andy says... take a dump before you leave home.
You didn't provide quite enough info though. 1.3# is a huge difference in frame weight in a good quality steel frame which should come in at 3 to 3 1/2, maybe 4 pounds. There is some obvious difference- like maybe one is lugged and the other isn't? Check wall thickness too. I can tell you this... compare frame weights with main tubes of .7mm-.5mm, with ones of .9mm-.8mm, and there ain't 1.3 pounds difference unless the frame is "really" huge. LOL
You probably need to do a little homework. Weight? 1.3# is significant in the frame alone. A full third heavier (assuming the lighter one is 3#). At the end of the day? Nothing. You could take either frame and depending on your component choice and build a bike that weighs in at 15-16 pounds if you're a weight weenie. If your not and don't want to spend the buck on light weight components then the difference is even less meaningful.
Like Andy says... take a dump before you leave home.
Likes For reddog3:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 241
Bikes: Wilier Izoard, Tricross FG
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting...I thought that the thinner walls alone would have made the Spirit tubing much easier to dent. The other frame in 725 also had lugs, which is likely why there's a ~1.3lbs difference. That's also just a ballpark figure. My main concern was durability and how much I really sacrifice between the two different tubings.
#6
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times
in
2,517 Posts
I assume you are talking about the shaped Spirit, which is about as light as anyone would consider for making a steel frame. I've considered, but never talked myself into using that tubing. My Spirit for Lugs bike has taken a very severe shot without bending and has no dents. I know people have brazed the shaped spirit, but it's probably more suitable for TIG.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
If you move from .6mm to .5mm I think the heavier material is 44% more dent resistant, but dents are not the only measure of durability. With high end gear probably not the main one. If you change the tubing section it gets more complicated to calculate, but I would think the dentability factor gets worse on larger tubes. Maybe like 10%.
on 24 inches of 1.25 tubing that reduction would save you about 1.7 ounces of frame weight. You are basically saving a foil like piece the thickness of a sheet of paper.
on 24 inches of 1.25 tubing that reduction would save you about 1.7 ounces of frame weight. You are basically saving a foil like piece the thickness of a sheet of paper.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Collegeville, PA
Posts: 1,350
Bikes: Ruckelshaus Randonneur, Specialized Allez (early 90's, steel), Ruckelshaus Path Bomber currently being built
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The last frame I built was from Spirit for Lugs. It's pretty tough stuff. I wouldn't play the drums on the top tube with a pedal wrench, but so long as you're not abusing your bike, it will be fine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pstock
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
13
12-10-14 06:11 PM