Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Replacing chainstays on a lugged frame bike

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Replacing chainstays on a lugged frame bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-12, 10:13 AM
  #1  
Have bike, will travel
Thread Starter
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Replacing chainstays on a lugged frame bike

Is it feasible for a skilled framebuilder to remove existing round chainstays and replace them with oval chainstays to improve tire clearance while improving stiffness? The bike is a 1978 Trek. Eutectic 1810 low-temp silver alloy brazing rod was used to braze the frame, back in the day.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 11:31 AM
  #2  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
you could use round oval round chainstays. Anything else would require major revamping of the BB shell. Anything can be done, somewhere on Bilenky's site they have pictures of replacing a BB shell with an eccentric bb shell. I imagine you would find this surgery to be too expensive though.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 01:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times in 2,305 Posts
Not sure a narrower chain stay (having been squished to oval either by the factory of by the builder) will be stiffer in the pedalling directions. (Also not sure how much a stay's wall thickness relates to pedalling stiffness, the rear triangle is a triangulated structure unlike the main triangle where the tubes lay on the same plane). Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 09:47 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,739
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
Is it feasible for a skilled framebuilder to remove existing round chainstays and replace them with oval chainstays to improve tire clearance while improving stiffness? The bike is a 1978 Trek. Eutectic 1810 low-temp silver alloy brazing rod was used to braze the frame, back in the day.
OP; 1) technically it should be possible to indent the chainstays on the tire side without removing them from the frame to give you the bit more tire clearance. This would involve make a set of dies (see the thread at the top of this forum for the "show us your work" or show us your builds). You would need to make a die for the round outside to keep its shape and make one for indent on the inside. Then you have to find something to push the inside die into the chainstay while it is held in the outside die. Figuratively I am having a mental picture of a "jaws of life" like hydraulic device... something strong enough but small enough to still fit in between the stays and allow space for the inside die. There should be something to do the job.

2) More realistic; I would recommend seeking someone currently owning a touring version of the Trek who is looking for a bit more of a racer style.... then just figure out how to convince them to just swap frames with you. Baring success there, just buy a touring trek off Craigs and sell of the racer trek if you no longer want it.
ksisler is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 12:18 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
To get the BB shell hot enough to pull the tube out, you may change the bond ,
of the other 2 main tubes.. as that will also be at melting point.

Last edited by fietsbob; 01-02-13 at 12:22 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 12:35 PM
  #6  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by ksisler
OP; 1) technically it should be possible to indent the chainstays on the tire side without removing them from the frame to give you the bit more tire clearance. This would involve make a set of dies (see the thread at the top of this forum for the "show us your work" or show us your builds). You would need to make a die for the round outside to keep its shape and make one for indent on the inside. Then you have to find something to push the inside die into the chainstay while it is held in the outside die. Figuratively I am having a mental picture of a "jaws of life" like hydraulic device... something strong enough but small enough to still fit in between the stays and allow space for the inside die. There should be something to do the job.

2) More realistic; I would recommend seeking someone currently owning a touring version of the Trek who is looking for a bit more of a racer style.... then just figure out how to convince them to just swap frames with you. Baring success there, just buy a touring trek off Craigs and sell of the racer trek if you no longer want it.
A couple of C-clamps?
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 12:39 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times in 2,305 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
To get the BB shell hot enough to pull the tube out, you may change the bond ,
of the other 2 main tubes.. as that will also be at melting point.
Unless you cut off the CS at the end of the shell's socket and then grind out the remaining CS. Depending on the fit of the replacement using Silver might be able to be used for the rebrazing.

But this is a lot of work for more clearance. before I'd suggest replacements I'd indent the origonal CSs. A simple rounded form of the correct diameter pressed into the CSs should do it, as mentioned. I don't think a hydrolic press would be needed. A big hammer is how I'd start. Andy.
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 01:14 PM
  #8  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
IIRC, these Treks were pretty well dented to start with, so I'm not sure how much more clearance you are going to get with that approach. You can get a chainstay into most bench vises, so that's the approach I would take if I wanted it to look good. Using appropriate cauls, obviously.

See here for procedure:
https://alexandchristine.smugmug.com/...P1080110-M.jpg

Last edited by unterhausen; 01-02-13 at 02:49 PM.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Collector of Useless Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I've successfully indented chainstays to increase tire clearance. I fabricated a die out of a short round piece of bar stock about 3/8" diameter brazed to a plate, and semi-circular cut in a block of plastic for the outside of the chainstay, and used a 3" narrow-jaw vice to press the die into the inside of the chainstays, covering both with small pieces of leather to keep from marring the paint. It worked beautifully. Added a good 5 mm more clearance on each side.

This won't increase the stiffness, and may require some cold-setting to realign the rear triangle afterwards. It's easier with high-ten chainstays.
cycle_maven is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 03:20 PM
  #10  
Have bike, will travel
Thread Starter
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
Unless you cut off the CS at the end of the shell's socket and then grind out the remaining CS. Depending on the fit of the replacement using Silver might be able to be used for the rebrazing.

But this is a lot of work for more clearance. before I'd suggest replacements I'd indent the origonal CSs. A simple rounded form of the correct diameter pressed into the CSs should do it, as mentioned. I don't think a hydrolic press would be needed. A big hammer is how I'd start. Andy.
Originally Posted by cycle_maven
I've successfully indented chainstays to increase tire clearance. I fabricated a die out of a short round piece of bar stock about 3/8" diameter brazed to a plate, and semi-circular cut in a block of plastic for the outside of the chainstay, and used a 3" narrow-jaw vice to press the die into the inside of the chainstays, covering both with small pieces of leather to keep from marring the paint. It worked beautifully. Added a good 5 mm more clearance on each side.

This won't increase the stiffness, and may require some cold-setting to realign the rear triangle afterwards. It's easier with high-ten chainstays.
Yes, I spoke with a frame-builder who suggested denting the chain-stays and re-alignment of the rear triangle. He had a frame on hand that he had dented and the workmanship looked good. I'm seeking 4mm greater clearance, just 2mm on each stay. The existing chain-stays are round and the material is Columbus SP. The job should go well. I'll post before and after pics later this month.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mstateglfr
Framebuilders
29
12-12-18 11:12 AM
mudmouse
General Cycling Discussion
2
07-21-13 06:36 PM
TiHabanero
Framebuilders
16
04-15-13 06:44 PM
bektravels
Road Cycling
0
11-08-11 09:47 PM
Arrowspoke
Road Cycling
33
01-14-10 01:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.