Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    demon speeder soda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    My Bikes
    commuter: Kona Fire Mountain Road: Mongoose Pro Bosberg
    Posts
    449
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    which has more horsepower when divided by weight?

    A few years ago, I saw a small piece of trivia that said the stongest man in the NFL (for that year) was a kicker if you divided his max bench by his bodyweight. Today that thought popped into my head and I was wondering how a cyclist and car would compare if you divided a cyclist's max horsepower by their weight and then did the same for a vehicle of your choice. What do you think?
    *insert some super cool statement here to make me as cool as the rest of the super cool signature gang*

  2. #2
    cyclist/gearhead/cycli... moxfyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    DC / Maryland suburbs
    My Bikes
    Homebuilt tourer/commuter, modified-beyond-recognition 1990 Trek 1100, reasonably stock 2002-ish Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo
    Posts
    4,182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've heard a top pro cyclist gets ~2 HP (for a brief sprint) out of a 180 lb. body: that's 0.011 HP/lb. On the other hand, a 2530 lb. Toyota Corolla CE has a top power of roughly 130 HP: that's 0.051 HP/lb, significantly higher. CAR WINS.

    A car--even one not designed for great power--definitely has greater max power per weight than a person. This isn't a very fair comparison though, because in a car designed for power, the engine can just be made bigger and stronger and heavier. Human bodies are designed to do a lot more than just generate power, and it's hard to optimize them for this specific purpose.

    A more interesting comparison, I think, is the energy consumed per pound of weight per mile traveled... The book Bicycling Science says that a human on a bicycle is the most efficient method of locomotion ever, by this standard. This kinda makes sense: a car has a lot of power, but it gets this power by being enormously heavy and not so aerodynamic, while a bike is explicitly designed to be light and aerodynamic.

    Another interesting thing to compare would be cruising speed versus weight: on my road bike (total weight ~200 lbs) I can cruise at 20 mph quite comfortably. That's 0.100 mph/lb. On the other hand, that Toyota Corolla would probably struggle mightily at 120 mph. That's 0.047 mph/lb. BIKE WINS!

    Basically, there are lots of ways to measure the relative performance of cars and bikes, and it seems to me that where efficiency counts (rather than raw power) bikes blow away the competition.
    My bikes | Linux and Python stuff | Photo gallery

    Sheldon Brown, I miss you. Thanks for the advice, ideas, humor, and infectious enthusiasm for everything bikes...

  3. #3
    2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM slvoid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
    Posts
    15,765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The same calculation with a 396lb dry honda cbr 1000rr with 172hp?
    Say it's 430 wet.

    That's 0.4hp/lb.
    Crusing along at 120mph, that's .28mph/lb.

    Acceleration? Forget about it... *drool*

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •