Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-27-05, 10:24 AM   #1
demon speeder
Thread Starter
soda's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Bikes: commuter: Kona Fire Mountain Road: Mongoose Pro Bosberg
Posts: 449
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
which has more horsepower when divided by weight?

A few years ago, I saw a small piece of trivia that said the stongest man in the NFL (for that year) was a kicker if you divided his max bench by his bodyweight. Today that thought popped into my head and I was wondering how a cyclist and car would compare if you divided a cyclist's max horsepower by their weight and then did the same for a vehicle of your choice. What do you think?
soda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-05, 10:36 AM   #2
moxfyre's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: DC / Maryland suburbs
Bikes: Homebuilt tourer/commuter, modified-beyond-recognition 1990 Trek 1100, reasonably stock 2002-ish Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo
Posts: 4,166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've heard a top pro cyclist gets ~2 HP (for a brief sprint) out of a 180 lb. body: that's 0.011 HP/lb. On the other hand, a 2530 lb. Toyota Corolla CE has a top power of roughly 130 HP: that's 0.051 HP/lb, significantly higher. CAR WINS.

A car--even one not designed for great power--definitely has greater max power per weight than a person. This isn't a very fair comparison though, because in a car designed for power, the engine can just be made bigger and stronger and heavier. Human bodies are designed to do a lot more than just generate power, and it's hard to optimize them for this specific purpose.

A more interesting comparison, I think, is the energy consumed per pound of weight per mile traveled... The book Bicycling Science says that a human on a bicycle is the most efficient method of locomotion ever, by this standard. This kinda makes sense: a car has a lot of power, but it gets this power by being enormously heavy and not so aerodynamic, while a bike is explicitly designed to be light and aerodynamic.

Another interesting thing to compare would be cruising speed versus weight: on my road bike (total weight ~200 lbs) I can cruise at 20 mph quite comfortably. That's 0.100 mph/lb. On the other hand, that Toyota Corolla would probably struggle mightily at 120 mph. That's 0.047 mph/lb. BIKE WINS!

Basically, there are lots of ways to measure the relative performance of cars and bikes, and it seems to me that where efficiency counts (rather than raw power) bikes blow away the competition.
moxfyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-05, 12:53 PM   #3
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
slvoid's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Posts: 15,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The same calculation with a 396lb dry honda cbr 1000rr with 172hp?
Say it's 430 wet.

That's 0.4hp/lb.
Crusing along at 120mph, that's .28mph/lb.

Acceleration? Forget about it... *drool*
slvoid is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 PM.