Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Nude Carabon?

  1. #1
    Senior Member bboseley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Orlando
    My Bikes
    Trek 5500
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Nude Carabon?

    I very recently purchased a new 2004 Trek carbon bike – in the “nude carbon” color. I love the bike – all Dura-Ace – no complaints at all. Maybe.

    Does anyone know what the nude carbon should look like? Basically my bike is black with grey and white trim. My wife wonders if the “splotchy” look is normal. I had just assumed that’s the way it’s supposed to look, but she thinks otherwise. To me, if it weren’t for this sort of sanded appearance, it would simply be a black bike.

    Anyway, I thought I would get some input before making a fool of myself by complaining about the “paint job”.

  2. #2
    Dude who rides bike BikeInMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    U S of A
    Posts
    626
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, yours is normal for an 04.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Metro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maplewood, NJ
    My Bikes
    EPX 303 (You probably never heard of it)
    Posts
    376
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bboseley
    I very recently purchased a new 2004 Trek carbon bike – in the “nude carbon” color. I love the bike – all Dura-Ace – no complaints at all. Maybe.

    Does anyone know what the nude carbon should look like? Basically my bike is black with grey and white trim. My wife wonders if the “splotchy” look is normal. I had just assumed that’s the way it’s supposed to look, but she thinks otherwise. To me, if it weren’t for this sort of sanded appearance, it would simply be a black bike.

    Anyway, I thought I would get some input before making a fool of myself by complaining about the “paint job”.
    I'd cover up is I were you ::blushing::

  4. #4
    Footballus vita est iamlucky13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
    Posts
    2,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most "nude" carbons should look like a fine checkered pattern. It's the most common way to weave the fibers. Got a close-up picture showing what you're talking about?
    "The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad

  5. #5
    Keep on climbing
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Marlborough, Massachusetts
    My Bikes
    2004 Calfee Tetra Pro
    Posts
    2,074
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a nude carbon bike. There are parts of it that have that checkerboard pattern to it, and there are other parts that look splotchy (to use the original poster's original description). It's just how the manufacturer put the various layers together. I imagine the splotchy areas just indicate that virtually all of the carbon fibers are running in one direction

  6. #6
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,562
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the splotchiness is the different thickness of resin. Racing sailboats use carbon fiber too and in some areas the resins are just thicker.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,411
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think the word for the "splotchy" CF is "prepeg". essentially, the fibers are on a big spool (think of a loom for fabric, lots of strands running parallel) and they go through an assembly line type of process where resin is applied, then dried, and rolled into big rolls, generally kept frozen so that the resin doesn't cure. the manufacturer then just takes the sheets from the rolls, thaws them, then uses a heat *** type of device to cure the resin fully. there was a good picture of the process in my materials textbook, if I still had it I'd scan it.

    The result is not a pretty carbon weave. instead, you get an ugly looking finish. generally, when you see that weave, it is not structural, it is there to look pretty and have a nice CF appearance. I suppose the "nude carbon" is just missing the cosmetic layer of "weave".

  8. #8
    Tour de DFW
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Texas
    My Bikes
    '05 Cervelo Soloist
    Posts
    472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    them there cranks, I 'reckon

    (I had doubted merton's texanity before this)

  9. #9
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,562
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MERTON
    why do them campy cranks look like marble?
    Are they "nude?"

    If not, then the final (really the first) layer was gel coat that can be made to look any color... such boats which are typically white, or truck shells which can be almost anycolor. The gel coat has no structural strength, but is simply a color layer. In fact if I remember correctly the resin has no structural strength either... it is the fibers that do all the work, and the resin simply is the binding for the fibers.

  10. #10
    Senior Member waterboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NorCal
    My Bikes
    Trek 5.2, Rocky mountain Hammer, K2 Cruiser
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The difference in the looks is determined by whether the top layer is unidirectional fibers (common to the pre 2005 Treks- aka splotchy) or if the top layer is of a woven material- the checkerboard. Its not true that a woven top layer is "cosmetic". The woven material provides a more isotropic final layer, providing strength in mutliple directions. This is often doen to better absorb imapct.

    It all just depends on what the engineers were trying to achieve in terms of fiber orientation for the outside layer. There are tradeoffs for every combination of fiber orientations. The outside layer may or may not reflect what is beneath it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •