Tandem cranks at 0 degree offset (L-R), 180 degrees (front to back)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tandem cranks at 0 degree offset (L-R), 180 degrees (front to back)
A thread over in the tandem forum got me thinking. At the coop new people will often mount cranks at a 0 degree offset. It's fun to have a laugh about it when you tell them to go ride the bike and the look on their face when they realize they've messed something up. However, if you've ever tried to ride a bike in that configuration, it doesn't work. It would only work if you were using clips/clipless, and even then it's very... odd.
HOWEVER, for a tandem it may work better, since you have help pulling those pedals back up. Has anybody ever tried this? Obviously it'd be much less efficient than 180 degree offset (L-R) but it may be fun for a while. (Plus it'd be hilarious to watch.)
Thoughts?
HOWEVER, for a tandem it may work better, since you have help pulling those pedals back up. Has anybody ever tried this? Obviously it'd be much less efficient than 180 degree offset (L-R) but it may be fun for a while. (Plus it'd be hilarious to watch.)
Thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
A thread over in the tandem forum got me thinking. At the coop new people will often mount cranks at a 0 degree offset. It's fun to have a laugh about it when you tell them to go ride the bike and the look on their face when they realize they've messed something up. However, if you've ever tried to ride a bike in that configuration, it doesn't work. It would only work if you were using clips/clipless, and even then it's very... odd.
HOWEVER, for a tandem it may work better, since you have help pulling those pedals back up. Has anybody ever tried this? Obviously it'd be much less efficient than 180 degree offset (L-R) but it may be fun for a while. (Plus it'd be hilarious to watch.)
Thoughts?
HOWEVER, for a tandem it may work better, since you have help pulling those pedals back up. Has anybody ever tried this? Obviously it'd be much less efficient than 180 degree offset (L-R) but it may be fun for a while. (Plus it'd be hilarious to watch.)
Thoughts?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,423 Posts
I think that what the OP is talking about is what swimmers and divers call "mermaid" style, namely pushing both legs together at the same time. Yes, it would work in a tandem with one rider providing power and returning the other's crank to the top, but would essentially double the power related stresses in the frame. However, it could be a fun experiment.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Senior Member
Setting them 180 degrees apart wouldn't accomplish anything constructive. The stoker would be in the power stroke with one leg while the captain is in the power stroke with the other. It *might* induce some foot interference problems. Setting them 90 degrees apart is sometimes done to even out the overall power output for the team. Again, if they're not banging feet because of it.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 766
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd think such a set-up would be less stressful on the frame, since there would be no torsional twisting of the tubes. Then again, both pedals together would have more of a sheering effect at the welds? Somebody make a rig and test it.
#6
Banned
Synchronized so The inside pedal is Up in a corner ,, is hard to do with the captain & stoker 90 degrees Out.
but the power is smoother ..
Handcycles work well with both cranks on the same side , as you say Mermaid style , since the rowing motion of combining the arms strength
works well .
but the power is smoother ..
Handcycles work well with both cranks on the same side , as you say Mermaid style , since the rowing motion of combining the arms strength
works well .
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think that what the OP is talking about is what swimmers and divers call "mermaid" style, namely pushing both legs together at the same time. Yes, it would work in a tandem with one rider providing power and returning the other's crank to the top, but would essentially double the power related stresses in the frame. However, it could be a fun experiment.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18372 Post(s)
Liked 4,507 Times
in
3,350 Posts
You could probably do it for fun.
Say a rider is standing on normal cranks/pedals, then one is putting 100% of one's weight on a single crank, then alternating to the opposite side.
With the two cranks together, standing, one would have to alternate between putting the weight on both cranks, then on the handlebars or seat, then back on both cranks.
In that case, your overall power would be cut in half.
Pedalling seated, it would depend on what percent of one's weight goes into the downward force.
I think I've seen a video of people using Power Cranks with a bunny-hop style cranking. Power Cranks on a tandem might be interesting.
Say a rider is standing on normal cranks/pedals, then one is putting 100% of one's weight on a single crank, then alternating to the opposite side.
With the two cranks together, standing, one would have to alternate between putting the weight on both cranks, then on the handlebars or seat, then back on both cranks.
In that case, your overall power would be cut in half.
Pedalling seated, it would depend on what percent of one's weight goes into the downward force.
I think I've seen a video of people using Power Cranks with a bunny-hop style cranking. Power Cranks on a tandem might be interesting.
#9
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
This is a good experiment for someone with a tandem trike... I think anyone else is going to fall on their heads
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aixaix
Tandem Cycling
15
09-16-10 08:12 AM