Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Disc brake evolution continues

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Disc brake evolution continues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-16, 08:37 AM
  #151  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
UCI has no effect over Your consumer behavior any mora then FIA is keeping you from buying a F1 race car to put in your collection,

You just cannot enter in one of their sanctioned races ..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 05-21-16, 07:15 PM
  #152  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 276
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote Originally Posted by Flinstone View Post
On road bikes aboslutely not. You cannot lock up a front wheel on smooth dry pavement.
mvcrash:
I used to think that as well until I observed a gentleman ride a motorcycle and bicycle and lock up the front wheel on both. The front lock-up on the bicycle caused the tire to wash out and he fell. On the motorcycle, since the C of G was much lower, he was able to stop safely. The point is that it can be done, but you will most likely crash.
No, the point is the low CG IS the WHOLE REASON why he could lock (slide) a front wheel and why a road cyclist cannot. There's a reason I said "on road bikes". Of course you can lock a front wheel on a recumbent and probably many sidewalk cruisers where your knees point to the sky. With a lower CG the endo limit is higher and you can get much more braking force on the tire without going over. When the CG is high (and/or forward, it's actually the angle to the cg from the front contact that matters, not the height), as in a road bike, you'll go over the handle bars before you can lose traction on the front wheel. Obviously exceptions exist for wet or loose pavement etc.

High speed air resistance also helps you stop faster without an endo but I don't think it changes contact friction threshold for endo very much since the air resistance force is probably directed pretty closely toward the center of mass.

Anyway these details are too much and if isn't possible in some extreme wasn't really the point. In fact the endo limit isn't sooo far from the traction limit anyway and rim brakes can deliver those levels of forces. That was the point.

Last edited by Flinstone; 05-21-16 at 09:21 PM.
Flinstone is offline  
Old 05-21-16, 09:24 PM
  #153  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 276
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
UCI has no effect over Your consumer behavior any mora then FIA is keeping you from buying a F1 race car to put in your collection,

You just cannot enter in one of their sanctioned races ..
UCI has a TON of effect on consumer options by way of (sometimes irrationally) influencing the decisions of other consumers in a market that is too small to provide a broad spectrum of options and mass production prices.

As for "anti lock" brakes being silly.. I don't know. With the cheap sensor technology available in smartphones now, an anti-endo (more tricky probably, but possible) front brake would allow you to push right up to maximum braking threshold, and yes it could have anti lock for wet conditions too. It wouldn't increase maximum braking but it would increase how close you could consistently and practically get to that max. Why not? If you're going to have wireless shifting, this makes about as much sense. I have to admit though, there's something about a bike as a purely mechanical device that is attractive to me. Sometimes I even want to throw the speedometer off and just push parts down the road. How far? enh.. out to that river over yonder and back.

Last edited by Flinstone; 05-21-16 at 09:37 PM.
Flinstone is offline  
Old 05-21-16, 11:42 PM
  #154  
Senior Member
 
Mobile 155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058

Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Flinstone
UCI has a TON of effect on consumer options by way of (sometimes irrationally) influencing the decisions of other consumers in a market that is too small to provide a broad spectrum of options and mass production prices.
Just to be clear where do you get the idea that the UCI has that big of an influence. As I understand it MTB and Hybrids make up 49 percent of the adult market. If you add Cruisers to that number you get about 62 percent of the market. Road bikes only make up about 20 percent and that has to be shared between allof the different levels of Road bike. The UCI has influence only on race bikes in that the manufacturers have to offer the particular model to the public to qualify to race. I dare say that is a very tiny fraction of bikes sold. In fact I believe if you look up the top ten brands sold in the US half of them don't have race bikes. I would almost wager most riders of the 62 percent don't even know who the UCI is. But just to show some of the numbers.

The Best-Selling Bikes | LIVESTRONG.COM
Mobile 155 is offline  
Old 05-22-16, 08:21 AM
  #155  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
How many Harley-Davidson riders care about FIM Moto GP regulations ?
fietsbob is offline  
Old 05-22-16, 08:33 AM
  #156  
SE Wis
 
dedhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,507

Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2743 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times in 2,053 Posts
Who's the UCI and why do I care what they think? Want discs, buy a bike with discs, don't then don't
dedhed is offline  
Old 06-10-16, 01:27 PM
  #157  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 2 Piece
I thought the limit on stopping power on a bicycle was the tires??
Hush; don't interject common sense while the discies are claiming better stopping power than rim brakes that can already overcome the traction of the tire and/or the endo limit. Especially don't point out that a rim brake is just a disc brake with vastly more surface area than their little mithril platters...and that doesn't send all the braking force through the spokes.
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 06-12-16, 04:11 PM
  #158  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,803

Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 118 Posts
Some are so worked up about choices. I like having choices...same way I loved it when MTB disc brakes came in and made fast downhill braking so much easier (well, I still get crazy forearm-pump on this 7-mile descent on Monarch Crest) and so much safer. I'm quite sure no mtn bike rim brakes are spec'd on bikes anymore. I think road disc will not take over in that way and that fast, but I like my choices and they will be great for many people. Rim brakes on the road brake very well (except when wet) and the hydraulic rim brakes brake with much less effort, but there will be a place for discs and they will keep developing. I held out on carbon wheels till now because I did not want rim brakes on carbon rims. I'm researching disc carbon rims, now that I have a disc bike (two actually). I cycle to escape the craziness and happen to have become a bit of a gearhead. Purists need not buy them and I see their point (lighter setup, works well enough, simple and easy to maintain) but no point fighting progress...it is a losing battle.
Chandne is offline  
Old 06-12-16, 05:44 PM
  #159  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
So------------what will the stiff necked old fools of the UCI (suddenly it is 1895 again) have to whine about when the disc mfg round the edges of their disc so they cant "cut" a racing cyclist?
rydabent is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
saabtour
Classic & Vintage
19
05-14-19 08:31 AM
spectastic
Road Cycling
48
11-04-16 08:55 AM
bt
Road Cycling
10
08-23-15 02:43 PM
anthonygeo
General Cycling Discussion
24
03-10-13 05:39 PM
|3iker
Bicycle Mechanics
1
04-14-10 06:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.