Grant Petersen: Threat or Menace?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Grant Petersen: Threat or Menace?
The Rivendell / Bridgestone guy has a lot of admirers and detractors. Where do you weigh in?
#4
Spandex free since 1963!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 400
Bikes: Cannondale Road Warrior 900, Surly Big Dummy, Electra Townie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Neither. Not sure what would make him either a threat or a menace.
#5
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
Maybe a good thread starter but it will end the same way every time. He is a great sales man and missed his calling when he passed up on used cars. Knows a lot about bikes but states his case in contradictions.
I tried to read his book but found his advice to be the obverse of every other cycling expert I have ever read. I decided to give the book away rather than even use it for reference. But I realize he wrote the book to sell his brand of bike so he has an excuse I guess.
I tried to read his book but found his advice to be the obverse of every other cycling expert I have ever read. I decided to give the book away rather than even use it for reference. But I realize he wrote the book to sell his brand of bike so he has an excuse I guess.
#7
Senior Member
Who's grant peterson? Oh grant petersen. Sorry. Ok, who's grant petersen?
Last edited by texaspandj; 06-07-16 at 07:07 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,724
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
However, based on how you phrased the question, I assume that you don't hold him in high regard.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
This 2012 interview says pretty much everything I'd have to say: Biking's Philosopher Crank.
Every niche hobby, craft and art form has at least one of the same controversial gurus. Nothing new. In current parlance, however incorrect etymologically speaking, they're the "analog" cheerleaders, rabble rousers and flag bearers.
On the plus side, he's no Ken Rockwell, which is a good thing. Unlike Rockwell, Grant doesn't strike me as a troll who posts controversial and simple-minded polemics merely for the sake of driving web traffic and arguments. And Grant's product is consistent with his philosophy. It's pretty close to my own view of cycling at my age (same as Grant's), and that of Velouria of Lovely Bike -- although her essays are consistently couched in the genteel prose of an Edwardian gentlelady. I keep imagining Lady Edith of Downtown Abbey as Velouria.
Every niche hobby, craft and art form has at least one of the same controversial gurus. Nothing new. In current parlance, however incorrect etymologically speaking, they're the "analog" cheerleaders, rabble rousers and flag bearers.
On the plus side, he's no Ken Rockwell, which is a good thing. Unlike Rockwell, Grant doesn't strike me as a troll who posts controversial and simple-minded polemics merely for the sake of driving web traffic and arguments. And Grant's product is consistent with his philosophy. It's pretty close to my own view of cycling at my age (same as Grant's), and that of Velouria of Lovely Bike -- although her essays are consistently couched in the genteel prose of an Edwardian gentlelady. I keep imagining Lady Edith of Downtown Abbey as Velouria.
Last edited by canklecat; 06-05-16 at 10:23 PM.
#10
Senior Member
I agree with a lot of his views on bikes and cycling even though I don't follow them religiously. I ride a modern road bike and wear spandex. I also have a Rivendell and it's a nice bike but not magical.
I read his book and thought he should have stuck to writing about bikes and cycling.
If you go to the shop in the Bay Area it's lower key than you'd expect from reading all the hype. He's a guy that's been in the industry for a long time and shares his opinions just like Bruce Gordon, Richard Sachs and a few others.
I read his book and thought he should have stuck to writing about bikes and cycling.
If you go to the shop in the Bay Area it's lower key than you'd expect from reading all the hype. He's a guy that's been in the industry for a long time and shares his opinions just like Bruce Gordon, Richard Sachs and a few others.
Last edited by GP; 06-05-16 at 10:27 PM.
#11
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times
in
220 Posts
This 2012 interview says pretty much everything I'd have to say: Biking's Philosopher Crank.
Every niche hobby, craft and art form has at least one of the same controversial gurus. Nothing new. In current parlance, however incorrect etymologically speaking, they're the "analog" cheerleaders, rabble rousers and flag bearers.
On the plus side, he's no Ken Rockwell, which is a good thing. Unlike Rockwell, Grant doesn't strike me as a troll who posts controversial and simple-minded polemics merely for the sake of driving web traffic and arguments. And Grant's product is consistent with his philosophy. It's pretty close to my own view of cycling at my age (same as Grant's), and that of Velouria of Lovely Bike -- although her essays are consistently couched in the genteel prose of an Edwardian gentlelady. I keep imagining Lady Edith of Downtown Abbey as Velouria.
Every niche hobby, craft and art form has at least one of the same controversial gurus. Nothing new. In current parlance, however incorrect etymologically speaking, they're the "analog" cheerleaders, rabble rousers and flag bearers.
On the plus side, he's no Ken Rockwell, which is a good thing. Unlike Rockwell, Grant doesn't strike me as a troll who posts controversial and simple-minded polemics merely for the sake of driving web traffic and arguments. And Grant's product is consistent with his philosophy. It's pretty close to my own view of cycling at my age (same as Grant's), and that of Velouria of Lovely Bike -- although her essays are consistently couched in the genteel prose of an Edwardian gentlelady. I keep imagining Lady Edith of Downtown Abbey as Velouria.
I am also a big fan of Velouria.
#12
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Vell, Zaphod's joost zis guy, you know?
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I agree with a lot of his views on bikes and cycling even though I don't follow them religiously. I ride a modern road bike and wear spandex. I also have a Rivendell and it's a nice bike but not magical.
I read his book and thought he should have stuck to writing about bikes and cycling.
If you go to the shop in the Bay Area it's lower key than you'd expect from reading all the hype. He's a guy that's been in the industry for a long time and shares his opinions just like Bruce Gordon, Richard Sachs and a few others.
I read his book and thought he should have stuck to writing about bikes and cycling.
If you go to the shop in the Bay Area it's lower key than you'd expect from reading all the hype. He's a guy that's been in the industry for a long time and shares his opinions just like Bruce Gordon, Richard Sachs and a few others.
Fine advice if you are wearing flip flops and a straw hat while sipping a umbrella drink on your beach cruiser but not so much when saving energy while doing rollers through wine country on Saturday with a few friends. He then goes on in a later chapter and says we have too many gears. We only need eight and we should mash more while climbing. Energy wasting advice if I have ever experienced it. Yet the bikes he designed and sells have more than eight gears typically.
I am thinking that in a conversation he would have to explain more of his just go out and ride dogma and admit that technique can make the experience more pleasurable even if that makes men like Joe Friel a better source for cycling information. I am sure very few of us think we have too many gears and that mashing up a hill is better than downshifting.
#14
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,245
Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Le Champion lilac, 2015 Specialized Secteur Elite
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have not read his book yet but does he threaten or scare people in it?
Or are you simply worried that one mans opinion and salesmanship will affect your own personal cycling?
Or were you just feeling overly dramatic and cheeky when you posted?
In that case you should have posted in A&S and added the word 'deadly'
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
I admire him. He's identified an audience for his bikes and has a clear vision of that audience. I like that he's got opinions. I probably don't agree with all of his opinions, but I do agree with some of them, and most of what he writes is at least thought-provoking and gets me to consider a point of view I might otherwise have missed.
#16
Banned
I'm Older than He Is, I Make My own choices ..
I was never hired by a Major Japanese corporation to run US Operations.
He does stay in Business successfully doing what he does, past the end of that Gig..
I was never hired by a Major Japanese corporation to run US Operations.
He does stay in Business successfully doing what he does, past the end of that Gig..
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: st augustine fl
Posts: 1,003
Bikes: 2017 BMC Roadmachine 01 Enve wheels, Sram red etap,Cinelli Vigorelli single speed, 2009 Cannondale Capo, 2016 trek Domane 6.9, disc and Di2, 2016 Scott Scale 710, 27.5 plus tires and boost rims
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
81 Posts
His views on diet and health in the book, Eat Bacon, Don't Jog
Eat Bacon, Don't Jog: Main Description: $13.95: Workman Publishing
are oversimplified and possibly lethal. Stay with what you know is generally good advice and this illustrates it.
I like his company, his bikes, some of his views on biking (I am a Carbon guy, however) his marketing.
Eat Bacon, Don't Jog: Main Description: $13.95: Workman Publishing
are oversimplified and possibly lethal. Stay with what you know is generally good advice and this illustrates it.
I like his company, his bikes, some of his views on biking (I am a Carbon guy, however) his marketing.
__________________
"ready to navigate"
"ready to navigate"
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Bicycling is a big tent with a lot of little cliques and we tend not to understand one another very well.
I have never raced bicycles. I don't commute to work anymore. I have never done a coast-to-coast loaded tour. I don't mountain bike anymore. I basically just use my bike to putz around and I find that to be fun. I get Grant Petersen.
I have never raced bicycles. I don't commute to work anymore. I have never done a coast-to-coast loaded tour. I don't mountain bike anymore. I basically just use my bike to putz around and I find that to be fun. I get Grant Petersen.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 702
Bikes: 2015 CAAD 10; 2016 Felt Z85
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 156 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Threat or menace?
I have not read his book yet but does he threaten or scare people in it?
Or are you simply worried that one mans opinion and salesmanship will affect your own personal cycling?
Or were you just feeling overly dramatic and cheeky when you posted?
In that case you should have posted in A&S and added the word 'deadly'
I have not read his book yet but does he threaten or scare people in it?
Or are you simply worried that one mans opinion and salesmanship will affect your own personal cycling?
Or were you just feeling overly dramatic and cheeky when you posted?
In that case you should have posted in A&S and added the word 'deadly'
#20
Full Member
Thread Starter
Because of the position he takes in Just Ride about racing having an unhealthy effect on bicycle marketing, I think a lot of people who own racing bikes and like to keep up with the latest technology dislike him.
#22
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,245
Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Le Champion lilac, 2015 Specialized Secteur Elite
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Actually, I do. I own a Bridgestone and an Atlantis and have bought both of his books. I don’t agree with everything he says, but I consider him to be a voice of reason.
Because of the position he takes in Just Ride about racing having an unhealthy effect on bicycle marketing, I think a lot of people who own racing bikes and like to keep up with the latest technology dislike him.
Because of the position he takes in Just Ride about racing having an unhealthy effect on bicycle marketing, I think a lot of people who own racing bikes and like to keep up with the latest technology dislike him.
I mean an expensive bike is cheaper than an expensive airplane or yacht right? That's all the justification ever needed
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 273
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As I stated earlier, I have not read his book but I can't imagine there is a rational person on the planet that could argue that point about racing having an unhealthy effect on marketing. These forums are a perfect example. Weight weenies, among others, regularly spend thousands of extra dollars for upgraded bikes and components while they are averaging 17 mph on their daily rides. But they love the snappy feeling they get while climbing hills lol. And who is anyone else to tell them how to ignore the nonsense marketing and stop wasting money?
I mean an expensive bike is cheaper than an expensive airplane or yacht right? That's all the justification ever needed
I mean an expensive bike is cheaper than an expensive airplane or yacht right? That's all the justification ever needed
#24
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I haven't read the books either, but I think the general idea is that the bikes a lot of us are being sold are not ideal for the kind of riding we do or could be doing. Skinny tires, big front chain rings, small rear clusters, a large saddle to bar drop, clipless pedals, etc. look really cool, and are great if you're racing and maybe if you can ride at a sustained 20+mph pace, but these sort of features aren't really ideal for a lot of people who could be cyclists. At least a few of my friends and acquaintances think that a racing bike and Lycra is what cycling is all about, not efficient commuting in an urban environment, for example, and that's what's not very helpful. Of course it's fine if someone wants to spend money on something. But isn't it also fine if a thoughtful, knowledgeable observer with a lot of experience wants to relate what he's seeing and thinking?
Thanks.
kg1
Thanks.
kg1
#25
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,245
Bikes: 1975 Motobecane Le Champion lilac, 2015 Specialized Secteur Elite
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I haven't read the books either, but I think the general idea is that the bikes a lot of us are being sold are not ideal for the kind of riding we do or could be doing. Skinny tires, big front chain rings, small rear clusters, a large saddle to bar drop, clipless pedals, etc. look really cool, and are great if you're racing and maybe if you can ride at a sustained 20+mph pace, but these sort of features aren't really ideal for a lot of people who could be cyclists. At least a few of my friends and acquaintances think that a racing bike and Lycra is what cycling is all about, not efficient commuting in an urban environment, for example, and that's what's not very helpful. Of course it's fine if someone wants to spend money on something. But isn't it also fine if a thoughtful, knowledgeable observer with a lot of experience wants to relate what he's seeing and thinking?
Thanks.
kg1
Thanks.
kg1
Well stated