Danger From Carbon Fiber Bikes
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The simple fact is that EVERYTHING has a fatigue life. Steel will obviously last the longest, but I'm not sure about aluminum vs. carbon fiber. Aluminum work hardens pretty quickly, and I don't think there is enough testing done on modern CF to make that decision.
I wonder if CF frames are made so strong because of some sort of fatigue problem. We know CF frames are strong as heck, as the pink bike video showed. But why? Obviously they don't NEED to be that strong to support a rider.
Unlike steel, a carbon fiber bike is not a forever bike. Very old CF bikes will be nothing more than wall hangers in the distant future.
I wonder if CF frames are made so strong because of some sort of fatigue problem. We know CF frames are strong as heck, as the pink bike video showed. But why? Obviously they don't NEED to be that strong to support a rider.
Unlike steel, a carbon fiber bike is not a forever bike. Very old CF bikes will be nothing more than wall hangers in the distant future.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unfair comparison. Steel and aluminum bikes have been around a heck of a lot longer so there are bound to be more broken frames from them.
#28
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 648 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
The simple fact is that EVERYTHING has a fatigue life. Steel will obviously last the longest, but I'm not sure about aluminum vs. carbon fiber. Aluminum work hardens pretty quickly, and I don't think there is enough testing done on modern CF to make that decision.
I wonder if CF frames are made so strong because of some sort of fatigue problem. We know CF frames are strong as heck, as the pink bike video showed. But why? Obviously they don't NEED to be that strong to support a rider.
Unlike steel, a carbon fiber bike is not a forever bike. Very old CF bikes will be nothing more than wall hangers in the distant future.
I wonder if CF frames are made so strong because of some sort of fatigue problem. We know CF frames are strong as heck, as the pink bike video showed. But why? Obviously they don't NEED to be that strong to support a rider.
Unlike steel, a carbon fiber bike is not a forever bike. Very old CF bikes will be nothing more than wall hangers in the distant future.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
85 Posts
True! But most of the ones that I have seen were newer model bikes (less than 20 years old). Considering that CF bikes were introduced in the late 80's and early 90's, the ratio may be close. And while I know that the technology and manufacturing methods of making CF bikes is different by leaps and bounds, it's also true with steel and aluminum using robotic welding vs manual welding.
__________________
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Martinsburg WV Area
Posts: 1,700
Bikes: State 4130 Custom, Giant Trance 29
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
121 Posts
Appears that any part of the bike can be recalled due to failure.
Recalls | Bicycle Retailer and Industry News
For the fun of it after reading the OP's message above, I did a quick Google search for Aluminum, Steel and Carbon Fiber failures.........Lots of all of above.
Sadly, the largest recalls in the site above is directly related to Suntour suspension................sigh...........
Recalls | Bicycle Retailer and Industry News
For the fun of it after reading the OP's message above, I did a quick Google search for Aluminum, Steel and Carbon Fiber failures.........Lots of all of above.
Sadly, the largest recalls in the site above is directly related to Suntour suspension................sigh...........
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Such ignorant BS. Back in the days when steel was the only flavour available, steel frames broke all the time. In my experience, frame failure rates went down when the industry moved to almost complete aluminum construction. Sturdy and heavy steel frames could generally be counted on to last a long time, but lightweight ones were generally built close to their limit of durability when subjected to real-world conditions. If it hadn't been for the hipster and retrogrouch movements that clamoured for steel frames (entirely for aesthetic reasons), steel construction would have gone completely away for most applications, and rightfully so.
I'll tell you what. Let's take 3 frames of equal value, all made this year, one of aluminum, one of steel, and one of CF and make a bet as to which one will be rideable for the longest amount of time. I'll take steel.
Try making your statements over in C&V and see the response you get there.
As for aesthetics, I'm pretty sure most common steel frames today are built with very similar sized tubing to the old aluminum cannondale bikes, meaning from a distance, there is no good way to determine which is which. I mean hell, to most people (aka the VAST...VAST majority) most metal frames look similar until you pick it up and say "oh, this must be aluminum."
As for old bikes built at their limit, have I shown you pictures of my skinny tubed, 25 year old steel racing bike that's still in perfect working order?
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,354
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2435 Post(s)
Liked 2,899 Times
in
1,651 Posts
Such ignorant BS. Back in the days when steel was the only flavour available, steel frames broke all the time. In my experience, frame failure rates went down when the industry moved to almost complete aluminum construction. Sturdy and heavy steel frames could generally be counted on to last a long time, but lightweight ones were generally built close to their limit of durability when subjected to real-world conditions. If it hadn't been for the hipster and retrogrouch movements that clamoured for steel frames (entirely for aesthetic reasons), steel construction would have gone completely away for most applications, and rightfully so.
And a Bianchi USA manager told me that Bianchi of Italy thought that the USA branch giving lifetime frame warranties on their steel racing bikes was funny. (Bianchi of Italy didn't offer a warranty on the racing frames that they provided to Bianchi USA, who just replaced warranty frames and threw out the broken ones.) Evidently someone at Bianchi of Italy told them, "Sure, we can give you a warranty on racing frames; they'll just be 2 kg heavier."
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,215
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
1) Man does that letter read as an African scam email
2) It is little surprise that legal council will gladly blame a defect on an opening you gave them (hitting a bump)
3) How often pros replace their bikes is irrelevant. Froome probably has more miles logged this year than I do in a life.
4) Any modern vehicle is built to a 10 year/100k lifespan. Lifespan does not mean something becomes unsafe afterwards, it means that the design was built to last at least that long.
5) If you're really worried about a 3 year old CF frame, I call dibs on a 55-56.
2) It is little surprise that legal council will gladly blame a defect on an opening you gave them (hitting a bump)
3) How often pros replace their bikes is irrelevant. Froome probably has more miles logged this year than I do in a life.
4) Any modern vehicle is built to a 10 year/100k lifespan. Lifespan does not mean something becomes unsafe afterwards, it means that the design was built to last at least that long.
5) If you're really worried about a 3 year old CF frame, I call dibs on a 55-56.
#34
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I believe the letter from a manuf of CF bikes confirms with I have posted from time to time. CF bikes, or far more accurately described is carbon fiber reinforced plastic. I know riders that have shelled out big bucks for a CF bike are annoyed when I say that, but it is the bottom line truth. The main weight of a so called CF frame is resin, or simply put plastic.
Further I have posted that these ultra light racing bikes are best left to the racers, and racing teams. They are doing apparently what Colnago say they are doing, throw them away after a year or two. The can afford to. So------------unless you are blessed with almost unlimited money, CF bikes are not for the average cyclist. In fact, again IMO, to be safe you should probably throw away a CF frame after a couple of year. And yes I know I will probably be deluged with tons of letters saying their CF frames are X years old and just fine. My reply is a simple lucky you.
Lastly, remember the rage for CF bikes is mainly salesmanship, and big profits.
Further I have posted that these ultra light racing bikes are best left to the racers, and racing teams. They are doing apparently what Colnago say they are doing, throw them away after a year or two. The can afford to. So------------unless you are blessed with almost unlimited money, CF bikes are not for the average cyclist. In fact, again IMO, to be safe you should probably throw away a CF frame after a couple of year. And yes I know I will probably be deluged with tons of letters saying their CF frames are X years old and just fine. My reply is a simple lucky you.
Lastly, remember the rage for CF bikes is mainly salesmanship, and big profits.
Last edited by rydabent; 07-22-16 at 01:10 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
True! But most of the ones that I have seen were newer model bikes (less than 20 years old). Considering that CF bikes were introduced in the late 80's and early 90's, the ratio may be close. And while I know that the technology and manufacturing methods of making CF bikes is different by leaps and bounds, it's also true with steel and aluminum using robotic welding vs manual welding.
I have to agree with your above statement. I wonder if it's due to the overall popularity of cheaper bikes from those eras? When did making cheap bikes become a (big) thing? Obviously there have always been price wars, but at some point in every industry things start getting manufactured in china and they start producing a lot lower quality stuff.
If Schwinn is any indication, it was probably around the time you mentioned that this happened with bikes. But I'm not old enough to know for sure, so I'll leave this question out there.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126
Bikes: Steel 1x's
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Similar info spelled out from Specialized on their high end carbon fiber road bikes:
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ROAD
• CONDITION 1: Bikes designed for riding on a paved surface where the tires do not lose ground contact.
• INTENDED: To be ridden on paved roads only.
• NOT INTENDED: For off-road, cyclocross, or touring with racks or panniers.
• TRADE OFF: Material use is optimized to deliver both light weight and specific performance.
You must understand that:
(1) these types of bikes are intended to give an aggressive racer or competitive cyclist a performance advantage over a relatively short product life,
(2) a less aggressive rider will enjoy longer frame life,
(3) you are choosing light weight (shorter frame life) over more frame weight and a longer frame life,
(4) you are choosing light weight over more dent resistant or rugged frames that weigh more.
All frames that are very light need frequent inspection. These frames are likely to be damaged or broken in a crash.
They are not designed to take abuse or be a rugged workhorse
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ROAD
• CONDITION 1: Bikes designed for riding on a paved surface where the tires do not lose ground contact.
• INTENDED: To be ridden on paved roads only.
• NOT INTENDED: For off-road, cyclocross, or touring with racks or panniers.
• TRADE OFF: Material use is optimized to deliver both light weight and specific performance.
You must understand that:
(1) these types of bikes are intended to give an aggressive racer or competitive cyclist a performance advantage over a relatively short product life,
(2) a less aggressive rider will enjoy longer frame life,
(3) you are choosing light weight (shorter frame life) over more frame weight and a longer frame life,
(4) you are choosing light weight over more dent resistant or rugged frames that weigh more.
All frames that are very light need frequent inspection. These frames are likely to be damaged or broken in a crash.
They are not designed to take abuse or be a rugged workhorse
#38
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,845
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 925 Times
in
610 Posts
Probably 1 bucket per page, but then I will gain too much weight, and break my aluminum & steel frames. Glad I don't have carbon !! .... oh wait, my Six/13 has a little bit.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#39
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I might add that CF is not the do all end all miracle substance that some think. If you read any aviation news, you will know that French Airbus airplanes that have CF tail assemblies have had the vertical section of the tail break clear off the airplane two more times killing all aboard. A large number of commercial pilots will not let their families fly on French Airbus airplanes.
#40
Senior Member
Similar info spelled out from Specialized on their high end carbon fiber road bikes:
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ROAD
• CONDITION 1: Bikes designed for riding on a paved surface where the tires do not lose ground contact.
• INTENDED: To be ridden on paved roads only.
• NOT INTENDED: For off-road, cyclocross, or touring with racks or panniers.
• TRADE OFF: Material use is optimized to deliver both light weight and specific performance.
You must understand that:
(1) these types of bikes are intended to give an aggressive racer or competitive cyclist a performance advantage over a relatively short product life,
(2) a less aggressive rider will enjoy longer frame life,
(3) you are choosing light weight (shorter frame life) over more frame weight and a longer frame life,
(4) you are choosing light weight over more dent resistant or rugged frames that weigh more.
All frames that are very light need frequent inspection. These frames are likely to be damaged or broken in a crash.
They are not designed to take abuse or be a rugged workhorse
HIGH-PERFORMANCE ROAD
• CONDITION 1: Bikes designed for riding on a paved surface where the tires do not lose ground contact.
• INTENDED: To be ridden on paved roads only.
• NOT INTENDED: For off-road, cyclocross, or touring with racks or panniers.
• TRADE OFF: Material use is optimized to deliver both light weight and specific performance.
You must understand that:
(1) these types of bikes are intended to give an aggressive racer or competitive cyclist a performance advantage over a relatively short product life,
(2) a less aggressive rider will enjoy longer frame life,
(3) you are choosing light weight (shorter frame life) over more frame weight and a longer frame life,
(4) you are choosing light weight over more dent resistant or rugged frames that weigh more.
All frames that are very light need frequent inspection. These frames are likely to be damaged or broken in a crash.
They are not designed to take abuse or be a rugged workhorse
You probably won't find a manufacturer that says 'sure, go ahead and crash this bike all you want, it will take it just fine' regardless of material.
Lastly, of course when you choose an ultralight bike (of any material) you should expect a compromise.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,354
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2435 Post(s)
Liked 2,899 Times
in
1,651 Posts
This might be as good a place as any to again post a link to a page on Sheldon Brown's site reporting the results from bike frame fatigue tests conducted for the German magazine Tour. (Short version: all of the steel frames and titanium frames failed during testing; some of the carbon frames and aluminum frames failed; the only frames that didn't fail were two welded aluminum frames and a carbon fiber frame.)
12 High-End Frames in the EFBe Fatigue Test
I suspect that some of the people posting in this thread will have difficulty accepting the conclusions from that test. Unfortunately, they'll be going up against German engineers.
12 High-End Frames in the EFBe Fatigue Test
I suspect that some of the people posting in this thread will have difficulty accepting the conclusions from that test. Unfortunately, they'll be going up against German engineers.
#42
Senior Member
I might add that CF is not the do all end all miracle substance that some think. If you read any aviation news, you will know that French Airbus airplanes that have CF tail assemblies have had the vertical section of the tail break clear off the airplane two more times killing all aboard. A large number of commercial pilots will not let their families fly on French Airbus airplanes.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This might be as good a place as any to again post a link to a page on Sheldon Brown's site reporting the results from bike frame fatigue tests conducted for the German magazine Tour. (Short version: all of the steel frames and titanium frames failed during testing; some of the carbon frames and aluminum frames failed; the only frames that didn't fail were two welded aluminum frames and a carbon fiber frame.)
12 High-End Frames in the EFBe Fatigue Test
I suspect that some of the people posting in this thread will have difficulty accepting the conclusions from that test. Unfortunately, they'll be going up against German engineers.
12 High-End Frames in the EFBe Fatigue Test
I suspect that some of the people posting in this thread will have difficulty accepting the conclusions from that test. Unfortunately, they'll be going up against German engineers.
A caveat, though, is appropriate: the results hold for a frame which is ridden hard but not damaged or abused: corrosion, nicks, dents, scratches and stresses due to incorrect installation of components could alter the results, as the article itself notes.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Can we turn this thread into a picture war?
It'd be much more popcorn inducing and involves less typing of the already ingrained biases we all have.
I'll start.
It'd be much more popcorn inducing and involves less typing of the already ingrained biases we all have.
I'll start.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
I'm not likely to convince the wife that I need a carbon fiber bike enough to justify buying one, so I guess I'm good.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18324 Post(s)
Liked 4,492 Times
in
3,339 Posts
I might add that CF is not the do all end all miracle substance that some think. If you read any aviation news, you will know that French Airbus airplanes that have CF tail assemblies have had the vertical section of the tail break clear off the airplane two more times killing all aboard. A large number of commercial pilots will not let their families fly on French Airbus airplanes.
Or, perhaps only dreamliners with lead acid batteries?
Perhaps the issue is engineering pushing the envelope. Leanest, Lightest, Fastest.
In the Indy-500.... one just needs a car that will last 501 miles.... most of the time.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Looks like the front ends of the rails were simply embedded in a lump of Bondo.stuck to the saddle pan. CF tend not to fracture that cleanly.
#50
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 648 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
As for your claim that frame failures were due to 'unrefined production methods in a budding industry', that excuse could have been used up to about 1930 or so. Steel welding and brazing is very mature technology. The reason steel bikes had a high failure rate was because they were made too light, usually with tube walls that were too thin, to make up for the fact that steel bikes are heavy compared to the burgeoning alternative materials.