Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-05, 08:22 PM   #1
Chumpson
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bike Rack Help

I have used the search function and read many of posts. Thanks to these I have found that I need a hitch mounted on the back of my van for the 4-5 bikes for my family. I used etrailer and found the 2" Here. Now I need to decide on a rack.

I have a wife and 3 kids: 7, 5 and 3. Wondering if anyone has thoughts on a good system that this hitch will support for my family. I am willing to think short term, but would like to get something that will be of use to us for many years.

Thanks for the help in advance!!!!!
Chumpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-05, 08:27 PM   #2
Chumpson
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Am I right in thinking I need a 2" hitch? It seems like the cost isn't any different, why not?
Chumpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-05, 08:39 PM   #3
Portis
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Posts: 6,019
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A 2" receiver is preferred in my opinion because it gives you more options. Many bike racks with 1.25 " receivers are limited to hauling only 2 bikes. Some will hold four, it depends on the design. REally there is no difference except that the square is bigger on the 2". It is also more common.

I like the 1.25" because it is less conspicuous. IOW, my 1.25" receivers (on my Chrysler cirrus and Pontiac Montana) are barely noticeable. The 2" ones are a bit more of an eyesore although not bad. It really all boils down to your choice.
Portis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-05, 09:08 PM   #4
Chumpson
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am looking to carry 5 bikes in the future and just thought that the bigger ones were stronger/could carry a larger load, is that not the case?
Chumpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-05, 11:31 AM   #5
halfbiked
dangerous with tools
 
halfbiked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: minneapolis
Bikes: fat, long, single & fast
Posts: 4,502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chumpson
I am looking to carry 5 bikes in the future and just thought that the bigger ones were stronger/could carry a larger load, is that not the case?
Yes. Get the 2". Is this a fullsize van or minivan? Forget it. Get the 2" either way, for exactly the reason you suspect.

Having said all that, I know nothing of what 4 or 5 bike racks are available. I like the 2 bike yakima on the back of my girlfriend's subaru.
halfbiked is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 PM.