Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 52
  1. #1
    not revenge...punishment interceptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    541
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looking to get a computer. New to this,nothing fancy,just basics.
    Wireless vs. wired. Do the wireless need periodic adjustments or anything like that?
    Are they as or less sensitive than wired? Is the only downfall of wired.....THE WIRE?
    Recommendations? Brands?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    By-Tor...or the Snow Dog? hi565's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ma
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Cross Concept, Flyte Srs-3
    Posts
    6,483
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by interceptor
    Looking to get a computer. New to this,nothing fancy,just basics.
    Wireless vs. wired. Do the wireless need periodic adjustments or anything like that?
    Are they as or less sensitive than wired? Is the only downfall of wired.....THE WIRE?
    Recommendations? Brands?

    Thanks.
    well ones has no wires to wire and the has wires to wire now unless you are planning to take the bike and comp and bring it to a shop, wiring it takes time! like it took me an hour!
    ----------------------------------------------------------

  3. #3
    if x=byh then x+1=byn blandin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    See signature
    Posts
    3,443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wireless provides a cleaner look and requires two sets of batteries. Wired takes a little longer to install but will function longer before the battery needs to be changed. My favorite, the Sigma BC-1600 is available either way and both attach very simply without tools. It has a good sized display, all the basic functions and will accept a cadence kit, but only in wired mode.
    '00 TiSports Titanium - DA 9 speed------ '01 KHS Flite 800 - DA/Utegra 9 speed mix
    02
    Ellsworth Flight - Ultegra 10 speed -.'03 Basso Coral - Ultegra 10 speed
    '03 Specialized Allez Pro - DA 10 speed .'04 Scattante CFR Limited - DA 9 speed
    '05 KHS Flite 2000 - Ultegra 9 speed -... '06 Flyte SRS-3 - DA 9 speed-------
    '05 Serotta Fierte - Utegra 10 speed--..-'07 Pedal Force RS - SRAM Force

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    181
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have each type (two different bikes) and recommend both -- the Cateye 7 and 8. They run about $30/$35 at Performance. I don't find the wire to be a problem at all but I think it's personal preference. I bought it for the cadence feature. If you want cadence without wires, you're looking upwards of $100. The wireless one has a cleaner look but sometimes high tension wires interfere with it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just like the wireless. Performance makes a house brand Axion 10W. Nice, reliable and affordable.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    had 4 wires comp and 1 wireless

    the wire does get cut if you travel/ship alot or generally thrash around a bit

    the connections are often less than perfect in very wet conditions, my cateye simply zeroed out several times during the rain

    bought the cheap supergo wireless and darn the battery-transmitter is surprisingly heavy, but a-okay in a heavy downpour

  7. #7
    HWS
    HWS is offline
    Fuji Shill HWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    WPAFB, OH
    My Bikes
    Fuji Roubaix
    Posts
    1,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I bought a cheapie Schwinn wired comp for 15 bucks at Dicks. It took about 10 minutes to install and works great. As for accuracy.....I think its pretty close. I do pretty much the same ride 6 or 7 days a week and the distance is within .001 mile everytime. I've had it for 2 years and it still has the original batteries.

  8. #8
    acciaio is real Wurm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Earth (for now)
    My Bikes
    Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
    Posts
    1,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't use a wired comp again, not with well-working units such as the Cateye Micro Wireless on the market (model # CC-MC100W). Easy set-up, can mount on the stem or bar, accurate, reliable, comes in black or silver. Has everything but cadence/altimeter, and I don't need those functions.

    What more do you want - free? LINK



  9. #9
    Lets Ride Trekke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Biking Country, USA
    My Bikes
    Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
    Posts
    1,102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wireless all the way! This is the 21st century ya know.
    Phil

  10. #10
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hi565
    well ones has no wires to wire and the has wires to wire now unless you are planning to take the bike and comp and bring it to a shop, wiring it takes time! like it took me an hour!
    An hour to wire a computer???

    I'd say installation time wired vs wireless to be about a wash. While you do have to figure out how to run the wire neatly, a handful of zip ties are usually all that is needed for a quick, neat installation.

    The drawback to wireless computers is that they have a very limited range and are sometimes sensitive to objects, like brake arms that are in the computer's line-of-sight. I install the magnet and pickup first, and then spin the wheel and hold the head to be sure I'm getting a signal. Then I hold the head where I plan to mount it on the handlebar to be sure that I'm still getting a signal. It's not normally a big deal but then neither is running the computer wire.

    The bike computer that I recommend for most people is the Cateye Enduro. They're cheap and it has a fatter wire that's less likely to get broken.

  11. #11
    not revenge...punishment interceptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    541
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks.

  12. #12
    Spoked to Death phidauex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
    Posts
    1,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd avoid wireless unless you have some odd circumstance that demands it.. More batteries + interference problems = hassle that for most people outweighs the benefit of running all of 12 inches of wire.

    My favorite is the Sigma BC-1600 as well, it can be acquired for around 20$ if you look on ebay, and slightly more elsewhere (though still quite reasonable, even at its MSRP), it holds two wheel sizes in memory (for switching between two bikes, if you buy a second sensor assembly), has about every feature you'd want, including an optional cadence sensor, intelligent controls, good size, and flexible mounting options (mine is mounted on my stem).

    Oh, and it took me about 15 minutes to cleanly install...

    peace,
    sam

  13. #13
    Conquer Cancer rider Boudicca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    Road bike, road bike, road bike (folder). See a trend here?
    Posts
    5,756
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The interference thing is an issue with some cellphones, or even with signals from cars or streetcars. I had a wireless and took it back it because it kept giving inaccurate readings (top speed 90km/h for example). I now have a cateye enduro, which works just fine. The wire is not as pretty as the wireless, but it just works better.
    Zero gallons to the mile

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    207
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ditto to this guy...I just installed the same one in about 10 minutes and it is perfect. I ride with my girl who has my old bike with a wired avocet 50 computer (i think thats the model) and both are dead nuts the same at the end of each ride...ave speed, mileage, ride time are all the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wurm
    I wouldn't use a wired comp again, not with well-working units such as the Cateye Micro Wireless on the market (model # CC-MC100W). Easy set-up, can mount on the stem or bar, accurate, reliable, comes in black or silver. Has everything but cadence/altimeter, and I don't need those functions.

    What more do you want - free? LINK



  15. #15
    Toyota Racing Dev. PWRDbyTRD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knoxville, TN baby!
    My Bikes
    2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux
    Posts
    3,340
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would run wireless, but wireless computers and HIDs do not work well together, therefore, I don't use a wireless. I use an astrale 8.
    Linkage...My 2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux My Mindless Banter
    Disclaimer: I'm 425lb...I put unnormal loads on my bike. This should help you in answering any of my questions.

  16. #16
    acciaio is real Wurm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Earth (for now)
    My Bikes
    Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
    Posts
    1,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by phidauex
    I'd avoid wireless unless you have some odd circumstance that demands it.. More batteries + interference problems = hassle that for most people outweighs the benefit of running all of 12 inches of wire.
    That's not the case with good wireless designs like the Cateye Micro that I and kritter spoke of. I live in a fairly large metro area and ride in the city a lot. I've had exactly zero interference problems with this unit since I started using it about a month ago. None at all from power lines, cars, train crossings, cells, etc.

    And what's the BS about batteries? How often does one need replacing - about every year or two? It's not a big deal to take a quarter, open the back, insert battery. If you're worried about it, replace the batteries once a year at the start of the riding season.

    The sensor has a 70 cm. range to the main unit, which should be plenty for most needs. I have mine mounted on the stem with the sensor on the right side of the fork about 38 cm. away. The main unit detaches easily so you can take it with you.

    The Micro works flawlessly every time I get on the bike, which is every day.
    Last edited by Wurm; 06-05-05 at 01:59 PM.

  17. #17
    Spoked to Death phidauex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
    Posts
    1,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wurm
    That's not the case with good wireless designs like the Cateye Micro that I and kritter spoke of. I live in a fairly large metro area and ride in the city a lot. I've had exactly zero interference problems with this unit since I started using it about a month ago. None at all from power lines, cars, train crossings, cells, etc.

    And what's the BS about batteries? How often does one need replacing - about every year or two? It's not a big deal to take a quarter, open the back, insert battery. If you're worried about it, replace the batteries once a year at the start of the riding season.

    The sensor has a 70 cm. range to the main unit, which should be plenty for most needs. I have mine mounted on the stem with the sensor on the right side of the fork about 38 cm. away. The main unit detaches easily so you can take it with you.

    The Micro works flawlessly every time I get on the bike, which is every day.
    I suppose my point is this... For the teeny tiny wire run (that has to be run anyway, because of brake cables), wireless offers a lot of expense (and some potential hassle, which I'm glad you haven't experienced, but many people have), for almost no benefit. Like I said, a clean wired install is lightning fast, and will cause you zero problems ever. A clean wireless install might take 2 minutes less, but might cause other problems down the road.

    Unless you have a special circumstance that would make a wire run highly impractical, you might as well save 20$ and remove the possibility of problems or additional hassle by going with a wired unit. I know that the wireless are high-zoot and all, but they really aren't that practical for most riders. Wireless computer mice, on the other hand.. Totally worth the hassle.

    peace,
    sam

  18. #18
    acciaio is real Wurm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Earth (for now)
    My Bikes
    Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
    Posts
    1,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's usually not a big job to install a wired unit, except for something like a Campy ErgoBrain which I never want to install again! But some people want the cleaner look of a wireless, and that's the main reason I bought the Micro. It's an awesome unit, and I must confess I got a great deal on it from a friend who wanted the HRM version.

    If I had any problems to report about it at all, believe me I would.

  19. #19
    jur
    jur is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got the cheapie Supergo wireless, but ran into problems: The range is 60cm only, and I can't mount it on my handlebars because of that. I had it there and it worked originally, but as soon as the cooler weather set in, it stopped counting pulses on cold mornings. The transmitter is on the suspension forks as high as possible but it is still not enough. I had to mount the display unit on the top tube, and even there the distance is just inside 60cm.

    The other thing I have against mine is it does not start auto, only shutdown auto. So sometimes I forget to switch it on.

    For these 2 reasons I am looking to get a wired.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Nachoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Point Loma, CA
    My Bikes
    Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
    Posts
    12,549
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My wireless flight deck requires replacement of one of the two batteries at leaset a few times per year, whereas my wired cycle computer batteries I replace only about once every five years. Now this is no problem, if you catch it soon enough when the "low battery" light is flashing, because all it costs is a couple bucks. But if you wiat too long to change, your computer loses all the data, and it requires reprograming all info again. (I hate when that happens).
    .
    .

    Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.

  21. #21
    Wil
    Wil is offline
    Brake chatter on CX forks Wil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    '04 Kona Jake, '05 Kona Stuff, '07 Specialized Langster
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Has anyone any experience with wireless in the rain/winter? Does the sensor/battery hold up well to road crap, and the muck of winter?

  22. #22
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Weather proofness depends on if the person took the time to ensure the seals were correct and how the unit was designed in the first place, result: answers will vary.

    I'll agree with the no go with the wireless. I'd trade mine for a wired right now. Freaking interference. At least I know now whether or not the traffic lights detected me by looking at the comp and seeing if it's spiking 99kph until I move off.

  23. #23
    Lets Ride Trekke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Biking Country, USA
    My Bikes
    Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
    Posts
    1,102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wil
    Has anyone any experience with wireless in the rain/winter? Does the sensor/battery hold up well to road crap, and the muck of winter?
    What would be the downside of wireless in wet conditions? You eliminate wire and contact points. The wireless transmit and recieve function doesn't care or is not affected by weather conditions at 2 feet. So in my opinion wired would have more weather related components and possible negative issues than wireless.

    I just have never seen the wireless work as anthing but perfect or as advertised in any condition and I have riden them all.
    Phil

  24. #24
    acciaio is real Wurm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Earth (for now)
    My Bikes
    Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
    Posts
    1,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator
    ...I'll agree with the no go with the wireless. I'd trade mine for a wired right now. Freaking interference. At least I know now whether or not the traffic lights detected me by looking at the comp and seeing if it's spiking 99kph until I move off.
    Dudes! If you want a wireless that actually works, I'm tellin' ya's to try the Cateye Micro. It has NO probs with interference or with range. Cateye has hit the ball outta the park with this one.

    Maybe it's my steel frame that acts as a good antenna between the sensor and main unit? All other materials...ahhh not so good?!

  25. #25
    Lets Ride Trekke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Biking Country, USA
    My Bikes
    Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
    Posts
    1,102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wurm
    Dudes! If you want a wireless that actually works, I'm tellin' ya's to try the Cateye Micro. It has NO probs with interference or with range. Cateye has hit the ball outta the park with this one.

    Maybe it's my steel frame that acts as a good antenna between the sensor and main unit.
    Totally agree with the CatEye products. Don't really get the steel comment but since you put a big grin at the end don't know if I actually need to.
    Phil

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •