Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-05, 08:42 PM   #1
interceptor
not revenge...punishment
Thread Starter
 
interceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Looking to get a computer. New to this,nothing fancy,just basics.
Wireless vs. wired. Do the wireless need periodic adjustments or anything like that?
Are they as or less sensitive than wired? Is the only downfall of wired.....THE WIRE?
Recommendations? Brands?

Thanks.
interceptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-05, 08:57 PM   #2
hi565
By-Tor...or the Snow Dog?
 
hi565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ma
Bikes: Bianchi Cross Concept, Flyte Srs-3
Posts: 6,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by interceptor
Looking to get a computer. New to this,nothing fancy,just basics.
Wireless vs. wired. Do the wireless need periodic adjustments or anything like that?
Are they as or less sensitive than wired? Is the only downfall of wired.....THE WIRE?
Recommendations? Brands?

Thanks.
well ones has no wires to wire and the has wires to wire now unless you are planning to take the bike and comp and bring it to a shop, wiring it takes time! like it took me an hour!
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------
hi565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-05, 09:27 PM   #3
blandin
if x=byh then x+1=byn
 
blandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Bikes: See signature
Posts: 3,442
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wireless provides a cleaner look and requires two sets of batteries. Wired takes a little longer to install but will function longer before the battery needs to be changed. My favorite, the Sigma BC-1600 is available either way and both attach very simply without tools. It has a good sized display, all the basic functions and will accept a cadence kit, but only in wired mode.
__________________
'00 TiSports Titanium - DA 9 speed------ '01 KHS Flite 800 - DA/Utegra 9 speed mix
02
Ellsworth Flight - Ultegra 10 speed -.'03 Basso Coral - Ultegra 10 speed
'03 Specialized Allez Pro - DA 10 speed .'04 Scattante CFR Limited - DA 9 speed
'05 KHS Flite 2000 - Ultegra 9 speed -... '06 Flyte SRS-3 - DA 9 speed-------
'05 Serotta Fierte - Utegra 10 speed--..-'07 Pedal Force RS - SRAM Force
blandin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-05, 09:49 PM   #4
Post42K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern VA
Bikes:
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have each type (two different bikes) and recommend both -- the Cateye 7 and 8. They run about $30/$35 at Performance. I don't find the wire to be a problem at all but I think it's personal preference. I bought it for the cadence feature. If you want cadence without wires, you're looking upwards of $100. The wireless one has a cleaner look but sometimes high tension wires interfere with it.
Post42K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 03:22 AM   #5
samp02
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 1,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just like the wireless. Performance makes a house brand Axion 10W. Nice, reliable and affordable.
samp02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 05:26 AM   #6
mooncricket
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 290
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
had 4 wires comp and 1 wireless

the wire does get cut if you travel/ship alot or generally thrash around a bit

the connections are often less than perfect in very wet conditions, my cateye simply zeroed out several times during the rain

bought the cheap supergo wireless and darn the battery-transmitter is surprisingly heavy, but a-okay in a heavy downpour
mooncricket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 06:23 AM   #7
HWS
Fuji Shill
 
HWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WPAFB, OH
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix
Posts: 1,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I bought a cheapie Schwinn wired comp for 15 bucks at Dicks. It took about 10 minutes to install and works great. As for accuracy.....I think its pretty close. I do pretty much the same ride 6 or 7 days a week and the distance is within .001 mile everytime. I've had it for 2 years and it still has the original batteries.
HWS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 06:30 AM   #8
Wurm
acciaio is real
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth (for now)
Bikes: Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
Posts: 1,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wouldn't use a wired comp again, not with well-working units such as the Cateye Micro Wireless on the market (model # CC-MC100W). Easy set-up, can mount on the stem or bar, accurate, reliable, comes in black or silver. Has everything but cadence/altimeter, and I don't need those functions.

What more do you want - free? LINK


Wurm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 06:57 AM   #9
Trekke
Lets Ride
 
Trekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Biking Country, USA
Bikes: Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wireless all the way! This is the 21st century ya know.
Trekke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 11:28 AM   #10
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,492
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hi565
well ones has no wires to wire and the has wires to wire now unless you are planning to take the bike and comp and bring it to a shop, wiring it takes time! like it took me an hour!
An hour to wire a computer???

I'd say installation time wired vs wireless to be about a wash. While you do have to figure out how to run the wire neatly, a handful of zip ties are usually all that is needed for a quick, neat installation.

The drawback to wireless computers is that they have a very limited range and are sometimes sensitive to objects, like brake arms that are in the computer's line-of-sight. I install the magnet and pickup first, and then spin the wheel and hold the head to be sure I'm getting a signal. Then I hold the head where I plan to mount it on the handlebar to be sure that I'm still getting a signal. It's not normally a big deal but then neither is running the computer wire.

The bike computer that I recommend for most people is the Cateye Enduro. They're cheap and it has a fatter wire that's less likely to get broken.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 11:30 AM   #11
interceptor
not revenge...punishment
Thread Starter
 
interceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks.
interceptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 12:49 PM   #12
phidauex
Spoked to Death
 
phidauex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Bikes: Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd avoid wireless unless you have some odd circumstance that demands it.. More batteries + interference problems = hassle that for most people outweighs the benefit of running all of 12 inches of wire.

My favorite is the Sigma BC-1600 as well, it can be acquired for around 20$ if you look on ebay, and slightly more elsewhere (though still quite reasonable, even at its MSRP), it holds two wheel sizes in memory (for switching between two bikes, if you buy a second sensor assembly), has about every feature you'd want, including an optional cadence sensor, intelligent controls, good size, and flexible mounting options (mine is mounted on my stem).

Oh, and it took me about 15 minutes to cleanly install...

peace,
sam
phidauex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 12:52 PM   #13
Boudicca
Conquer Cancer rider
 
Boudicca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: Fun bike, city bike, Bike Friday bike (also fun bike)
Posts: 5,978
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
The interference thing is an issue with some cellphones, or even with signals from cars or streetcars. I had a wireless and took it back it because it kept giving inaccurate readings (top speed 90km/h for example). I now have a cateye enduro, which works just fine. The wire is not as pretty as the wireless, but it just works better.
__________________
Zero gallons to the mile
Boudicca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 01:04 PM   #14
kritter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ditto to this guy...I just installed the same one in about 10 minutes and it is perfect. I ride with my girl who has my old bike with a wired avocet 50 computer (i think thats the model) and both are dead nuts the same at the end of each ride...ave speed, mileage, ride time are all the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
I wouldn't use a wired comp again, not with well-working units such as the Cateye Micro Wireless on the market (model # CC-MC100W). Easy set-up, can mount on the stem or bar, accurate, reliable, comes in black or silver. Has everything but cadence/altimeter, and I don't need those functions.

What more do you want - free? LINK


kritter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 01:07 PM   #15
PWRDbyTRD
Toyota Racing Dev.
 
PWRDbyTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN baby!
Bikes: 2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux
Posts: 3,339
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would run wireless, but wireless computers and HIDs do not work well together, therefore, I don't use a wireless. I use an astrale 8.
PWRDbyTRD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 01:49 PM   #16
Wurm
acciaio is real
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth (for now)
Bikes: Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
Posts: 1,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phidauex
I'd avoid wireless unless you have some odd circumstance that demands it.. More batteries + interference problems = hassle that for most people outweighs the benefit of running all of 12 inches of wire.
That's not the case with good wireless designs like the Cateye Micro that I and kritter spoke of. I live in a fairly large metro area and ride in the city a lot. I've had exactly zero interference problems with this unit since I started using it about a month ago. None at all from power lines, cars, train crossings, cells, etc.

And what's the BS about batteries? How often does one need replacing - about every year or two? It's not a big deal to take a quarter, open the back, insert battery. If you're worried about it, replace the batteries once a year at the start of the riding season.

The sensor has a 70 cm. range to the main unit, which should be plenty for most needs. I have mine mounted on the stem with the sensor on the right side of the fork about 38 cm. away. The main unit detaches easily so you can take it with you.

The Micro works flawlessly every time I get on the bike, which is every day.

Last edited by Wurm; 06-05-05 at 01:59 PM.
Wurm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 06:42 PM   #17
phidauex
Spoked to Death
 
phidauex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Bikes: Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
That's not the case with good wireless designs like the Cateye Micro that I and kritter spoke of. I live in a fairly large metro area and ride in the city a lot. I've had exactly zero interference problems with this unit since I started using it about a month ago. None at all from power lines, cars, train crossings, cells, etc.

And what's the BS about batteries? How often does one need replacing - about every year or two? It's not a big deal to take a quarter, open the back, insert battery. If you're worried about it, replace the batteries once a year at the start of the riding season.

The sensor has a 70 cm. range to the main unit, which should be plenty for most needs. I have mine mounted on the stem with the sensor on the right side of the fork about 38 cm. away. The main unit detaches easily so you can take it with you.

The Micro works flawlessly every time I get on the bike, which is every day.
I suppose my point is this... For the teeny tiny wire run (that has to be run anyway, because of brake cables), wireless offers a lot of expense (and some potential hassle, which I'm glad you haven't experienced, but many people have), for almost no benefit. Like I said, a clean wired install is lightning fast, and will cause you zero problems ever. A clean wireless install might take 2 minutes less, but might cause other problems down the road.

Unless you have a special circumstance that would make a wire run highly impractical, you might as well save 20$ and remove the possibility of problems or additional hassle by going with a wired unit. I know that the wireless are high-zoot and all, but they really aren't that practical for most riders. Wireless computer mice, on the other hand.. Totally worth the hassle.

peace,
sam
phidauex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 07:29 PM   #18
Wurm
acciaio is real
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth (for now)
Bikes: Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
Posts: 1,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's usually not a big job to install a wired unit, except for something like a Campy ErgoBrain which I never want to install again! But some people want the cleaner look of a wireless, and that's the main reason I bought the Micro. It's an awesome unit, and I must confess I got a great deal on it from a friend who wanted the HRM version.

If I had any problems to report about it at all, believe me I would.
Wurm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 07:38 PM   #19
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,806
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
I got the cheapie Supergo wireless, but ran into problems: The range is 60cm only, and I can't mount it on my handlebars because of that. I had it there and it worked originally, but as soon as the cooler weather set in, it stopped counting pulses on cold mornings. The transmitter is on the suspension forks as high as possible but it is still not enough. I had to mount the display unit on the top tube, and even there the distance is just inside 60cm.

The other thing I have against mine is it does not start auto, only shutdown auto. So sometimes I forget to switch it on.

For these 2 reasons I am looking to get a wired.
jur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 08:53 PM   #20
Nachoman
Senior Member
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Posts: 14,000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
My wireless flight deck requires replacement of one of the two batteries at leaset a few times per year, whereas my wired cycle computer batteries I replace only about once every five years. Now this is no problem, if you catch it soon enough when the "low battery" light is flashing, because all it costs is a couple bucks. But if you wiat too long to change, your computer loses all the data, and it requires reprograming all info again. (I hate when that happens).
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 09:41 PM   #21
Wil
Brake chatter on CX forks
 
Wil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Bikes: '04 Kona Jake, '05 Kona Stuff, '07 Specialized Langster
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Has anyone any experience with wireless in the rain/winter? Does the sensor/battery hold up well to road crap, and the muck of winter?
Wil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-05, 10:44 PM   #22
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Weather proofness depends on if the person took the time to ensure the seals were correct and how the unit was designed in the first place, result: answers will vary.

I'll agree with the no go with the wireless. I'd trade mine for a wired right now. Freaking interference. At least I know now whether or not the traffic lights detected me by looking at the comp and seeing if it's spiking 99kph until I move off.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 03:53 AM   #23
Trekke
Lets Ride
 
Trekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Biking Country, USA
Bikes: Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wil
Has anyone any experience with wireless in the rain/winter? Does the sensor/battery hold up well to road crap, and the muck of winter?
What would be the downside of wireless in wet conditions? You eliminate wire and contact points. The wireless transmit and recieve function doesn't care or is not affected by weather conditions at 2 feet. So in my opinion wired would have more weather related components and possible negative issues than wireless.

I just have never seen the wireless work as anthing but perfect or as advertised in any condition and I have riden them all.
Trekke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 03:54 AM   #24
Wurm
acciaio is real
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth (for now)
Bikes: Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
Posts: 1,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator
...I'll agree with the no go with the wireless. I'd trade mine for a wired right now. Freaking interference. At least I know now whether or not the traffic lights detected me by looking at the comp and seeing if it's spiking 99kph until I move off.
Dudes! If you want a wireless that actually works, I'm tellin' ya's to try the Cateye Micro. It has NO probs with interference or with range. Cateye has hit the ball outta the park with this one.

Maybe it's my steel frame that acts as a good antenna between the sensor and main unit? All other materials...ahhh not so good?!
Wurm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 03:57 AM   #25
Trekke
Lets Ride
 
Trekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Biking Country, USA
Bikes: Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Dudes! If you want a wireless that actually works, I'm tellin' ya's to try the Cateye Micro. It has NO probs with interference or with range. Cateye has hit the ball outta the park with this one.

Maybe it's my steel frame that acts as a good antenna between the sensor and main unit.
Totally agree with the CatEye products. Don't really get the steel comment but since you put a big grin at the end don't know if I actually need to.
Trekke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 PM.