Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    SIGN THE PETITION HERE - SAVE KILO & 500MTT

    To: UCI and IOC
    "We" (the undersigned) would like to register our surprise that the UCI (International Cycling Union) has agreed to the decision of the IOC (International Olympic Committee) to scrap the Track Men's Kilometre Time Trial and the Women's 500m Time Trial. This could severely damage the sport of track cycling, will curtail the careers of many dedicated track cyclists and could impact on public funding for track cycling in the form of either direct state funding or indirect state funding via sports governing bodies or Olympic programmes. We call on the UCI to rescind its decision and to inform the IOC that different cycling events will be put forward for deletion instead.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/1000k/petition.html

  2. #2
    cxmagazine dot com pitboss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Titus road, Fort CX
    Posts
    8,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    excellent.
    Signed. Thanks for the heads up.
    Deathlap - cyclocross, training, beer,...escape hatch

  3. #3
    Good Afternoon! SamHouston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    cannondale cad5, urbanist fixed
    Posts
    2,322
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another place to express (well spoken) outrage would be Here for the next 30 hours or so. Perhaps if a great percentage of questions for the President of the IOC are demands for an explanation it will get thier attention.
    My own question for the president:

    Why has the IOC in conjunction with the UCI
    terminated a traditional medal event namely the
    Mens 1 kilometer (Womens 500) time trial event
    in order to add "BMX" events to the 2008
    Olympics? Is the IOC responsible for upholding
    the traditions of Olympic competition or
    following a simpler mandate of swaying to the
    winds of what is popular at any given time?

    The track events have gained unprecedented
    popularity in North America and Japan in recent
    years, to tear down an event with a long history
    in order to placate sponsors seems like very bad
    judgement for a body with the responsibilities
    the IOC claims.

    How can eliminating only two very popular
    medals suddenly make it possible
    to provide for "BMX" events? Why should there not
    be both?

  4. #4
    Burn-em Upus Icephaltus Gojohnnygo.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    2,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Done
    Sick BubbleGum

  5. #5
    contrarian lala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    CO Springs
    My Bikes
    80's ross road bike/commuter, 80's team miyata, 90's haro mtb xtracycle conversion, koga mitaya world traveler
    Posts
    2,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Signed and questioned.
    Higher ground for the apocalypse!

  6. #6
    no one wants an alien FixednotBroken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    grandis track bike, cesare track bike, bianchi road bike
    Posts
    784
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    signed as well.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    this from cyclingnews.com:

    The UCI's decision to eliminate the men's and women's sprint time trials has caught administrators completely by surprise, as most thought it would be the men's and women's points races that would be sacrificed to make way for BMX.

    The process imposed by the International Olympic Committee is that to allow BMX events to be held in Beijing in 2008, cycling must take out two existing events. The theory is that it will reduce athlete numbers and keep a lid on costs for the host nation.

    However, it's a flawed and illogical process by any measure. Like the entry of MTB events at the expense of the road team time trials, it takes more money to build new venues and only increases the costs for the host nation, whose only saving is that they don't have to forge two extra sets of medals. Who are they kidding?

    There could be some political brinkmanship here by the UCI; killing the 'kilo' will lead to justifiable outrage. It may force the IOC to reconsider its conditions, because adding BMX will certainly increase the costs of staging an Olympics.

    Instead, there is a cruel sacrifice of two events that are absolute tests of the all-bets-are-off and no-excuses racing that is the heart and soul of track cycling.

    This is like athletics dumping the 100 metres sprint. And then there are we poor punters. Look at what we have just lost.

    The countdown of riders in the men's 'kilo' and women's 500 metre time trials, as they each have one crack at putting down the fastest time, can be one of the most exciting events in a track cycling program, offering this unique mixture of suspense and action unlike any other event. It's in the "can't miss" category.

    Over the years, we have seen and heard the crowds build their support for their favoured rider as he or she walks up to the starting gate, with chanting around the velodrome, clapping, stamping of feet. The tension is palpable. Eventually, and usually with some coaxing from the announcer, the crowd falls silent as they all join the rider and wait for the five-second countdown until the *** fires.

    And when it does fire, the energy from the crowd almost matches that of the rider as they burst out of the gate, every sinew of muscle straining to crank their huge gears up to speed. The men snort, hiss and wheeze as these human beings pump out over two kilowatts of power into the pedals. No rider in this event crosses the line ever feeling 'fresh'. They're cooked, and at an Olympics, they can condense four years of training into less than a minute of sustained effort.

    This is track cycling is its most purest form. Man or woman against the clock, and the crowd watching every pedal stroke, with an eye on the clock as they also estimate whether the rider is going to make the best time.

    These are not obscure, outdated and irrelevant events. They are highlights. Every Briton would have leapt for joy when the flying Scotsman, Chris Hoy pounded around the boards in the Athens Velodrome and bettered - yet again - this incredible succession of record-breaking rides in the 2004 kilo. Then there was Anna Meares' world-record breaking ride in the women's 500m time trial. This journalist cannot recall a more animated and genuinely excited Phil Liggett describe that one, and our 'voice of cycling' has seen his share of bike races.

    Indeed, the kilo is one of the foundation events from the first modern Olympics.

    This is not to deny BMX its place in an Olympics. Indeed, bring it in. But the UCI's decision to cut these two track events, and leave female sprinters with only one event, is hardly consistent with maintaining growth of the sport, and helping host nations keep a lid on costs. It won't cut costs, it won't reduce the number of athletes, all it will do is take away two of track cycling's most prized medals.

    In terms of athlete numbers, the sprinters that rode the kilo and 500m in Athens all doubled up for other events. Their successors will continue to fill the athletes' village, and they'll all still need a velodrome, an expensive facility that most Olympic host cities struggle to justify after the Games.

    Adding BMX therefore simply increases the number of athletes and venues that cycling requires at the Olympics. It's as through the UCI has deliberately given the finger to the IOC. "Right, we have to drop a discipline? We'll drop one that saves you exactly no money at all. Ha! Take that!" Oookayy...

    The decision fails to achieve the objective. Simon Clegg, the chief executive of the British Olympic Association, told the Times newspaper, "My reaction is one of considerable disappointment because the one kilometre time-trial is an event in which we have enjoyed so much success.

    "However, we have to accept that if a new discipline comes into the Games then the international federation has to remain within its numbers and effectively rejig its programme."

    This is what we journalists call, "absolute cobblers."

    As a representative of the people who've paid good money to watch these amazing athletes in action, the UCI and the IOC are wrong. This is our sport they are killing, and who gave them the right to do that?
    Last edited by FixednotBroken; 06-12-05 at 05:41 PM.

  7. #7
    I need more bikes!!! Mr. Shadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Durham, NC
    My Bikes
    2 roadies, 7 fixed-gears, 1 hardtail, 1 full suspension mtb, and 1 hybrid...so far.
    Posts
    472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why get rid of any events?
    "We are few now, but one day we will rule." That's what one of my fixies whispered as I walked by. I nodded in agreement, and thanked it for not waking the others.

  8. #8
    PBR ME ASAP Plow Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Hedge Tree Boulevard
    My Bikes
    Mtb,Road,Fixed
    Posts
    213
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ink should be dry by now.

  9. #9
    Guest
    Guest
    Signed. Perhaps you could bring this petition to the attention of cyclingnews.com?

    Koffee

  10. #10
    Senior Member taras0000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SamHouston
    Another place to express (well spoken) outrage would be Here for the next 30 hours or so. Perhaps if a great percentage of questions for the President of the IOC are demands for an explanation it will get thier attention.
    My own question for the president:

    Why has the IOC in conjunction with the UCI
    terminated a traditional medal event namely the
    Mens 1 kilometer (Womens 500) time trial event
    in order to add "BMX" events to the 2008
    Olympics? Is the IOC responsible for upholding
    the traditions of Olympic competition or
    following a simpler mandate of swaying to the
    winds of what is popular at any given time?

    The track events have gained unprecedented
    popularity in North America and Japan in recent
    years, to tear down an event with a long history
    in order to placate sponsors seems like very bad
    judgement for a body with the responsibilities
    the IOC claims.

    How can eliminating only two very popular
    medals suddenly make it possible
    to provide for "BMX" events? Why should there not
    be both?
    The "pose a question to Jacques Rogge" bit is interesting. Ask away and see what happens. I did. Hope this topic gets picked.
    Taras - :noun. 1. Typically an overweight has-been that can sometimes be seen pootling around a velodrome on an old Look KG 233.

  11. #11
    tbk
    tbk is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by koffee brown
    Signed. Perhaps you could bring this petition to the attention of cyclingnews.com?

    Koffee

    They know, its on there too and been signed by lots of Aussies as they are a very strong track nation

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicaggy
    My Bikes
    DeBernardi, Marin
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Signed. I doubt they'll drop the kilo. The Aussies would revolt, and God love 'em for it, too.

  13. #13
    deep fried goodness harlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    emerald city
    My Bikes
    rosemary (bstone); fat chance; serotta
    Posts
    310
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Signed and irritated. Why can't there be both? The Games are all about $$, marketing, and exposure anymore and they insist they must cap the number of events? In eliminating two events they're suppressing the development of the eliminated sports to new generations. Congratulations. Maybe we need some women track racers to unzip their track suits and flex for the cameras.
    Last edited by harlot; 06-13-05 at 11:21 PM.

  14. #14
    Aluminium Crusader :-)
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    9,877
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by soupless
    Signed. I doubt they'll drop the kilo. The Aussies would revolt, and God love 'em for it, too.
    Can't believe it!!

    Before the km should go, I'd be ditching other events such as the team sprint, the point's score or the madison.

    Can we post this on one of the larger forums to increase exposure?

  15. #15
    cxmagazine dot com pitboss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Titus road, Fort CX
    Posts
    8,270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 531Aussie
    Can we post this on one of the larger forums to increase exposure?
    looking into this now. Standby...
    Deathlap - cyclocross, training, beer,...escape hatch

  16. #16
    more ape than man timmhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    8,093
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it's sad that they would replace the sprint event with a subjectively scored event. IMO, i think bringing in more events which do not have standard ways to time or score is a mistake. it makes year to year records almost pointless and discredits the entire concept. olympic records should stand the test of time.

  17. #17
    no one wants an alien FixednotBroken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    grandis track bike, cesare track bike, bianchi road bike
    Posts
    784
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it's a stupid decision all round. sacrificing track events when you've already built the velodrome in which to stage them will not save any significant amount of money. it's a bad move brought about by beaurocracy at its worst - let's hope our voices can reverse the decision.

  18. #18
    Guest
    Guest
    Moved to larger forum for more exposure.

    Koffee B.

    Mod

  19. #19
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Im in!

    S/F<>
    CEYA!

  20. #20
    Senior Member midgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Illinois
    My Bikes
    2004 Raliegh Retro Glide 7(green of course), 2005 Stingray Pea Picker 2005 Specialized Hardrock 2014 Trek Crossfit
    Posts
    1,015
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    signed
    We're gonna have the hap, hap, happiest Christmas since Bing Crosby tap-danced with Danny ****ing Kaye.~Clark Griswold

  21. #21
    Senior Member LordOpie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Denver
    My Bikes
    2006 custom Walt Works roadie, 2003 Fuji Finest (road), 2002 Giant Iguana (mtb), 1986 BMW K75 (motor)
    Posts
    3,698
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Shadow
    Why get rid of any events?
    Good question. Sounds selfish?

  22. #22
    acciaio is real Wurm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Earth (for now)
    My Bikes
    Yes, bicycle(s) I own!
    Posts
    1,109
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Signed. What crackheads are running UCI & IOC now?

  23. #23
    more ape than man timmhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    8,093
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    very frustrating article - basically saying that they are following TV figures and that federations without specialist in the event voted it down. the new prez-elect seems to agree to everything and then when the heat is on wants to divert attention back to the IOC. pretty weak if you ask me.

    here is the article:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/othe...ng/4124822.stm

  24. #24
    Gone, but not forgotten Shiznaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100
    Posts
    4,509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess the popularity of track bikes isn't directly corollary to the popularity of track racing... its a shame really... I would surmise track biking is growing faster at this point than bmx racing anyways (which has already achieved and since passed its zenith).
    I'm biking across North America on the Internet!
    http://thedoublecross.blogspot.com/

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    541
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any more news on this?

    I can see why BMX racing is to be introduced, I guess it's a legitimate sport now and it shows the IOC as being down with the kids.
    But taking th
    e kilo out whilst there are still sports like synchro swimming...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •