Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Should a Bicycing licenses be created for all ages, and a test administered.

Voters
54. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    9 16.67%
  • No

    45 83.33%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 55
  1. #1
    Senior Member phoenyix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Driver Licenses for Bicylcists

    Well, Motorcyclist must have a cycle endorsement on their license, so why not bicyclists, all ages, having to pass a written test for a test of knowledge of the rules {Real young kids could be an oral test**. This would increase the accountability method for cycling offenses, and maybe also give cyclists more of a voice in road usage.

    One of the few a computer geek who also is a Bike geek.

  2. #2
    To infinity and beyond Anders K's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Cannondale M600, Crescent 92318, Bianchi Lo Spillone (tandem)
    Posts
    421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dirver licence for bicycles might be a little overkill. But they should start early in school teaching kids about traffic rules and the meaning of each roadsign.

    Anders K

  3. #3
    Queen of the Pea Pile oceanrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Boca Raton, FL on the beach
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No way.
    Picture yourself on a boat on a river, with tangerine trees and marmalade skies...

  4. #4
    Scooby Snax
    Guest
    Well In certain places you must have a licence plate on your bike...
    But I dont agree with it...
    You can be charged under the Highway Traffic Act for violations here in Ontario.
    But you don't have to carry ID. And its illegal to lie to the cops... well about your name, you can lie about your weight... or your bike's weight....

  5. #5
    Skin-Pounder Bikes-N-Drums's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Clarkston (Atlanta, GA., USA)
    Posts
    491
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    NO!!!
    We are the musicmakers and we are the dreamers of dreams...

  6. #6
    Almost Immortal The Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    My Bikes
    2004 Trek 7500FX
    Posts
    820
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted 'Yes'. I feel it would affirm the rights and responsibilities of cyclists in the eyes of law enforcement and the public. Perhaps it might, even if indirectly, smooth the way in the matter of 'equal access' -- more bike lanes, public parking/storage.

    It wouldn't trouble me to see two-wheeled scoff-laws taken to task for their indifferent safety and discourtesy either.

    Licensing fees? Fine. I'd pay them if I was assured the rights and privileges that motorists enjoy, and knew that my place as an operator of a vehicle in traffic was legitimized by the specific letter of the law.

    Robert A. Heinlein would say 'TANSTAAFL!' (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!)

    -Rob
    "Ignorance begets confidence more frequently than does knowledge." -Charles Darwin


    http://blog.myspace.com/robcatg

    http://therob.wordpress.com

  7. #7
    Junior Member grego262's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sharon Hill, PA
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No. At an early age we should instruct the kids on the rules of the road, and proper etiquitte. Perhaps some adults could use a refresher as well.

  8. #8
    human velocipedio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    living in the moment
    My Bikes
    2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    3,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Great idea! let's discourage more people from cycling.
    when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.

    The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
    Cycling irregularly since 2002

  9. #9
    Slow Moving Vehicle Jean Beetham Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Norwood, MA
    My Bikes
    Felt F-70, Terry Madeleine, Novara Safari fully customized by me
    Posts
    1,067
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted for licenses because:
    1) It would give an actual count of the number of us.
    2) It acknowledges our right to the highway while we acknowledge our duty to abide by the rules of the highway.
    3) It would mean that the police would have to be more aware of the bike rules of the road.
    4) It would put us on an equal footing with motorists in terms of user fees, strengthening our claim on the road.

    I am fully aware that this would be just as successful in producing safe cyclists as it is in producing safe motorists. I am willing to give up the freedom of non-registration for recognition of legal status.

  10. #10
    HomeBrew Master! Gus Riley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    West Central Illinois
    My Bikes
    Aegis Aro Svelte, Surly LHT, Cannondal R3000 tandem, Santana Triplet.
    Posts
    2,208
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    NO. In fact, auto driver’s license tests should possess much more bicycling questions. Such as does a bicyclist possess the same rights to the road as an auto on most roads? Is it a crime to threaten a bicyclist with you automobile? ETC ETC.

    Licenses for bicycling?...no. This would be just another way for the states to collect more money from us.
    2012 TransAm Tour journal link: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/Threeisacharm

    Naked Carbon Weave Aegis Aro Svelte, Purpleen Cannondale RT3000 Tandem, Orange Santana Triplet, Surly Long Haul Trucker

    So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides, 4th Century B.C.E.



    http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt...33f/weight.png

  11. #11
    Sumanitu taka owaci LittleBigMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can only see two reasons a license would be helpful for bicyclists:

    1) It would require cyclists to be trained, possibly saving their lives;
    2) It would establish cyclists' legal claim to ride on the street.

    However, I favor achieving the above two goals without the red tape of licensing.
    No worries

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Greenwich, UK
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I vote 'yes' on the condition that it becomes part of the school curriculum - so at about 10-12 you pass your bike test with all the others in your class

    I would also like to see a fine/punishment levied on all parents who drive kids to school who have passed their test.

  13. #13
    Junior Member grego262's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sharon Hill, PA
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by Brains
    I vote 'yes' on the condition that it becomes part of the school curriculum - so at about 10-12 you pass your bike test with all the others in your class

    I would also like to see a fine/punishment levied on all parents who drive kids to school who have passed their test.
    Would never work in the US, the crybabies at the ACLU would find something wrong with it.
    There is nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteeer.

    General James Doolitle, March 1942

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    dalecity.virginia
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the goverment telling me and my kids how to ride.........................I DONT THINK SO
    2001 Trek 6700

  15. #15
    Grounded Inkwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin, Land of the Cheeseheads
    Posts
    900
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm against giving the government the right to regulate EVERY aspect of people's lives.

    Anyway, I believe the constitution guarantees people freedom to travel (which is why bikes have the right to use the road.) If the government refuses to give someone a drivers license, then refuses to give them a bike license...what options do they have any more? Walk everywhere? Get a horse? Rollerblade? And if the government starts issuing rollerblade, horse, and walking licenses........????

  16. #16
    Junior Member grego262's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sharon Hill, PA
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A driver's license is a privilege in this country. The government should have and does take the licenses away from people. Its called responsibility. Now if they could just figure out a way to get those over 75 off the street it would be even better
    There is nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteeer.

    General James Doolitle, March 1942

  17. #17
    Every lane is a bike lane Chris L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
    Posts
    9,622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by Jean Beetham Smith
    I voted for licenses because:
    1) It would give an actual count of the number of us.
    Not really. Last I heard around 20% of call drivers on the road were unlicenced. I see a similar thing happening here, possibly on a greater scale.

    Originally posted by Jean Beetham Smith
    2) It acknowledges our right to the highway while we acknowledge our duty to abide by the rules of the highway.

    I already do acknowledge the rules of the highway, and many other cyclists do. However, given the number of drivers who fail to do so, I don't believe licencing on the same basis would make any difference to the behaviour of cyclists.

    Originally posted by Jean Beetham Smith
    3) It would mean that the police would have to be more aware of the bike rules of the road.

    As far as my interactions with the police go, they already are. It isn't the police's lack of knowledge here that poses any kind of threat to cyclists.

    Originally posted by Jean Beetham Smith
    4) It would put us on an equal footing with motorists in terms of user fees, strengthening our claim on the road.

    What? You mean we'd get heavily subsidised (like $3,000 each)? Do tell how a licence would have that outcome. The fact that I actually pay taxes strengthens my claim for a place on the road as much as I need to.

    Originally posted by Jean Beetham Smith
    I am fully aware that this would be just as successful in producing safe cyclists as it is in producing safe motorists.
    Yeah, not at all.

    Look, it's very simple. A car needs to be licenced because of the effects it's misuse can have on others. A the misuse of a bike is highly unlikely to impact on others on anything like that scale, hence there is no licence necessary.
    "I am never going to flirt with idleness again" - Roy Keane
    "We invite everyone to question the entire culture we take for granted." - Manic Street Preachers.
    My blog.
    My bike tours. Japan tour page under construction.

  18. #18
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No way.

  19. #19
    Fool O' crap sscyco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    spokane
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tricross, Allez steel, Transition, 2009 Bighit 3, Lightspeed Owl Hollow and Kitsuma - and a couple others
    Posts
    1,217
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think it is a great idea. Of course you can't stop at just one type of license -

    Tandem - The captain would have to have a class "A" license, and the stoker would have to at least have a learners permit.

    21-24-27-30 - Each time Shimano or Campy decides to squeeze in another cog we'd have to prove that we actualy know how to shift, the whole idea of a license is to prove we know how to
    ride, we better know how to use our new equipment.

    Those bike big Shwinn trikes - commercial license, hey, you could be making 30to40K in as little as 6 weeks.

    Unicycles - anyone who rides one of those is just a freak, they should be arrested and the unicycle impounded. (just a joke I ride one)

    Next we could license those little crappy scooters and rollerblades and skateboads and sport
    shoes - anything that can be operated on the street.

    Joe

  20. #20
    opinionated SOB cycletourist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Branson, Missouri USA
    Posts
    968
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Effective Cycling should be taught to all elementary school children and it should be taught again at the high school level. But liscensing? NEVER.

  21. #21
    To infinity and beyond Anders K's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Cannondale M600, Crescent 92318, Bianchi Lo Spillone (tandem)
    Posts
    421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would not a license stop young children from riding? Isn´t that what we want least of all, to dicourage the young ones from riding a bike? Parents saying NO, you cant ride your to young for a license.

    Anders K

  22. #22
    Bike Happy DanFromDetroit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI USA
    Posts
    695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted no because I think it would do no good, and adds to the red-tape that we all must deal with in our daily lives.

    However; I remember when I was a kid (30 years ago), that we were encouraged to "license" our bicycles. We would take the bicycle to the local police station and pay a small fee. The police department would give you a sticker to place on the bike. The sticker has a registration number that could be used to return the bike to you if it were lost or stolen. I think this practice went the way of fire alarm boxes at the end of the block, soda fountains and 10-speeds.
    There is nothing homlier than the face on your last dime.
    --John Wildcat, Greenback Friend

  23. #23
    Grounded Inkwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin, Land of the Cheeseheads
    Posts
    900
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by DanFromDetroit
    I remember when I was a kid (30 years ago), that we were encouraged to "license" our bicycles. We would take the bicycle to the local police station and pay a small fee. The police department would give you a sticker to place on the bike. The sticker has a registration number that could be used to return the bike to you if it were lost or stolen. I think this practice went the way of fire alarm boxes at the end of the block, soda fountains and 10-speeds.
    No, they still do this. My bike is licensed with the Seymour police department (License # 16 ) Something like $3 for two years--well worth it, in my opinion, if it means the police have your serial number already on record in case of theft.

  24. #24
    Huachuca Rider webist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    My Bikes
    Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix
    Posts
    4,274
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is a thought provoking question. At least for me it was. My first notion was that perhaps it would somehow ad "legitimacy" to our claim to the road and strengthen our ability to claim resources from the state for bike lanes, law enforcement, etc. I thought perhaps we might get bicycling questions added to driving tests, much like school busses have.

    Then, several questions worked their way into my thinking which made me uncomfortable.

    If we extend licensing to bicyclists, why not then scooter riders, in-line skaters, pedestrians, joggers and the like?

    How quickly would the state move from licensing to things like bicycle registration, taxes, inspections, etc.?

    With all that licensing data available, how soon would there be such a thing as mandatory bicycle insurance?

    I generally shy away from government involvement, especially when it involves taking my money.

    Carl
    Just Peddlin' Around

  25. #25
    Forum Admin lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    n.w. superdrome
    My Bikes
    1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
    Posts
    17,623
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No, We have way too much government intervention
    already.
    However, a voluntary certification might not be a
    bad thing. Would give some legitimacy to our claiming
    our rights to the road if we can prove we know
    rules of road etc.

    Marty
    Sono più lento di quel che sembra.
    Odio la gente, tutti.

    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •