Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-05, 10:22 PM   #1
Rick G
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
why

I believe this has been asked befor but I cannot find it so I will ask again.
Why is it that a decent road bike will run $600. and a decent mtn bike will run about $300. or $400..
whats the deal?
I would think that the mtn bike would be more cause it has to be built heavyer (sp)
Now I am not thinking of a carbon fiber bike or some exotic thing just a basic bike.

Rick
Rick G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-05, 10:56 PM   #2
catatonic
Chairman of the Bored
 
catatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)
Posts: 5,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Pretty much marketing.

Thing is most people buy mountain bikes anymore, and only those who are serious into biking tend to buy road bikes (well except those that buy that d**ned GMC denali bike....that thing is utterly craptacular).
catatonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-05, 11:01 PM   #3
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,614
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
I've wondered about that myself. Besides having more material in it, mountain bikes also have suspension forks which, I assume, cost more to make than an unsuspended fork. Other than that, feature wise they look to me to be pretty similar. If you're looking at price per pound, the more you pay for a bike, the less you get.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-05, 11:05 PM   #4
catatonic
Chairman of the Bored
 
catatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)
Posts: 5,825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The other side of the coin is lightweight usually equals higher risk of lawsuit-inducing failure...therefore the companies want to charge enough to be able to afford a good attorney or two if someone say, can't operate a seatpost clamp and takes out their kneecap or something.

I know bad example...but you get the idea.
catatonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-05, 12:38 AM   #5
phidauex
Spoked to Death
 
phidauex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Bikes: Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine Internal 8-speed, Scattante Ultegra roadie, Maserati fixie conversion
Posts: 1,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lightweight is harder to make. When you buy a steel frame, you aren't really buying steel. The steel is crap, its worth nothing, titanium, aluminum and CF are the same way, its not material that you pay for. Iron, titanium, carbon and aluminum are some of the most common substances in the earth's crust. What you are buying is the energy and time it took to design the frame, design the machines that make the material, make the machines that make it, and make the frame itself.

A mountain bike doesn't have to be all that light, people don't pay as much attention to the weight of a mountain bike. So you can use big heavy tubing that is easy to make. It doesn't even have to be butted! But to make something of comparable strength at half the weight... Now you are talking serious machines, and delicate tubing operations.

Well, that and marketing. Mountain bikes are for x-treme kids who want to be in mt. dew commercials, and road bikes are for rich old guys who think their quads look good. Rich old guys have more money than x-treme kids, so you price accordingly.

peace,
sam
phidauex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-05, 09:34 AM   #6
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Uh. The real reason why mountain bikes are cheaper is because they produce more than road bikes.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-05, 10:34 AM   #7
Vision-
Look out!
 
Vision-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Bikes: Specialized Hardrock, Raleigh Record Ace, Argon 18 700.5
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
If you're looking at price per pound, the more you pay for a bike, the less you get.
Same as cars, a Porche costs more than a Jeep. They're both designed for a purpose...
Vision- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.