Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Brooks saddle: Team Pro or Swift

    Hiya:

    Here is an eternal question; hoping someone has experience with both saddles. I have a Kona Pahoehoe MTB, which I use predominantly for paved trail/commuting/some single track/gravel around the city in which I live (Edmonton). I also like to hit a bit of technical track from time to time, including jumps and drops.

    I am 6ft, 165lbs, 33" waist, and my handlebars are 2-3" below my seat position. I ride about 120 miles per week, in 20-30 mile increments. My upper legs are probably a bit `larger' than is typical for most riders, due to other sporting activities that I am involved in.

    Which Brooks saddle would you think I should purchase, the Pro or the Swift? Believe me, I have read ALL of the other reviews, etc, but was hoping that someone out there has tried both saddles, and has a first-hand opinion and is able to persuade me one way or the other....! Thanks!

  2. #2
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both and they both work for me equally, although I have the Pro on one of my rigid Mtbs and the Swift on a road fixie. I also ride on a sprung Conquest on another rigid mtb. The Conquest is essentially a Pro with springs. If you're currently doing fine on narrow saddles, either should work. They're both meant for lower bar positions. The Swift is a tad narrow, lighter, sleeker looking, and expensive.....I know don't how you feel about gouging an expensive saddle riding a Mtb should you take a spill on the trail.
    Last edited by roadfix; 07-22-05 at 01:10 PM.
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  3. #3
    Senior Member randya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    in bed with your mom
    My Bikes
    who cares?
    Posts
    13,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The professional saddles are harder than *****. I tried one on a hybrid and finally gave up on breaking it in. IMO, they really only work for a road or racing bike where you're putting more of your weight on your hands and feet and less of your weight on your butt. I now use the Champion Flyer S exclusively (three of 'em) and my wife rides B66S and B67S saddles.

  4. #4
    Senior Member onbike 1939's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Fife Scotland
    My Bikes
    Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27
    Posts
    1,890
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ranya's right in saying that the Pro is harder than the usual B17. It uses a thicker butt of leather (although in the past they varied in thickness, I bought two and one was twice as thick as the other) and so this may present problems for the lighter rider when it comes to breaking-in. Since the new outfit took over at Brooks I've noticed the thickness of the butts used has become more consistent. Some people prefer the swift in that they find it's cutaway design prevents rubbing on the inside of the thighs. I doubt there is any difference in comfort as there are many factors involved in this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •