Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30
  1. #1
    Meow! my58vw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Riverside, California
    My Bikes
    Trek 2100 Road Bike, Full DA10, Cervelo P2K TT bike, Full DA10, Giant Boulder Steel Commuter
    Posts
    6,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    "Bike FAQ" Website...

    Well it is time...

    I am starting to put together my new "bike" website which by the domain name I am thinking about is a nice Faq type website that will hopefully be easy to use, etc. I am just in the beginning phases but I wanted maybe some input here...

    For those of you that do websites... it 800 x 600 still the best standard for web or should I be thinking about 1024 x 768? DSL vs Dialup?

    I am also planning to host my race training journal there along with a bike racing FAQ from sources that I have gotten from here on bike forums and other bike sites...

    Here is a start... my campy vs shimano banner!




    Any other ideas? Topics? Maybe a links section...? Hmmm this should be fun!
    Just your average club rider... :)

  2. #2
    Descends Like Avalanche HigherGround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Somewhere between Funkytown and Margaritaville, PA
    My Bikes
    Lynskey R330, Litespeed Classic, Eddy Merckx MX Leader, Specialized Rock Hopper Comp (1988!)
    Posts
    5,738
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know jack about designing a web site, but I would strongly suggest using upper-case rather than lower-case letters for "FAQ".
    The rider in my avatar is David Etxebarria, not me.

  3. #3
    Meow! my58vw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Riverside, California
    My Bikes
    Trek 2100 Road Bike, Full DA10, Cervelo P2K TT bike, Full DA10, Giant Boulder Steel Commuter
    Posts
    6,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HigherGround
    I don't know jack about designing a web site, but I would strongly suggest using upper-case rather than lower-case letters for "FAQ".
    Sorry, the domain name will more than likely be www.bikefaq.net or something simular.

    Let me make it clear this website is not for self promotion, although I will have my blog and sechedule hosted there along with a few articles that I have published. It is more designed around the FAQ sections that I have written, simular to what is in the thread in the road cycling forums. I mainly have as a place where people can go to read more about the topics that come up not only here but all over the internet on things like

    1. Campy vs Shimano
    2. Pace line edicate
    3. Bicycle Racing,

    Etc.
    Just your average club rider... :)

  4. #4
    Unique Vintage Steel cuda2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Allen, TX
    My Bikes
    Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
    Posts
    11,493
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I design mine to 1024x768 and above. I think most computer users out there have moved out of the 800x600 era by now. I have to remind myself to test all of my pages over on my laptop which is 1024 over my desktop which is running some insanely higher resolution.

    In other topics - what are you planning on coding the site in? asp? aspx? jsp? or some other 'filthy cult language' as my favorate professor always called them. My site is mostly static html at this point with a mix of asp (using vbscript) though the next generation will most likely be aspx (.net using C#) if I ever build anything worthy of actually using it. Right now the best I've had time to build dynamically is my home/updates page, a guestbook, and a photo album on my jonandmargaret.com page.

    oh, and I agree - BikeFAQ at least on the page. You can't really control how users will type it - though you can control how it shows up in the history and bookmarks. Just visually - well - better.

  5. #5
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought the domain name was bikefag.net. I was wrong.

  6. #6
    Lets Ride Trekke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Biking Country, USA
    My Bikes
    Trek 1200, Lemond Sarthe, Gary Fisher Tass
    Posts
    1,102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HigherGround
    I don't know jack about designing a web site, but I would strongly suggest using upper-case rather than lower-case letters for "FAQ".
    Yea I agree. He is not on "higher ground" with that one. No pun intended
    Phil

  7. #7
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BostonFixed
    I thought the domain name was bikefag.net. I was wrong.
    Yep, that 'q' sure looked like a 'g'......that was my very first impression I got when I saw the title....no biggie..
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  8. #8
    Meow! my58vw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Riverside, California
    My Bikes
    Trek 2100 Road Bike, Full DA10, Cervelo P2K TT bike, Full DA10, Giant Boulder Steel Commuter
    Posts
    6,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bikefag...

    BTW my area of specialty is Flash actionscript, although I am still looking at other possabilities for Languages including PHP...
    Just your average club rider... :)

  9. #9
    Fat Guy in Bike Shorts! manual_overide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez
    Posts
    630
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you should probably go 1024x768 but there are still a lot of people out there on 800x600. I usually design for 800x600, but make the design liquid so it will work for any reasonable resolution.

    I'd really try to stay away from flash as much as possible and go with html/css standards. You'd be amazed at the things you can do in css and occasionaly dhtml. Flash is slow, bloated, and doesn't work the way the web is "supposed" to work. Hit the back button? your animation starts over, you don't go back a page. Want to be indexed by google and other major search engines? Use html. Flash just shows up as a binary file. Want to cater to people with visual disabilities using screen readers and stuff? Don't use flash.

    Really, don't create the whole site in flash. You can do almost everything flash can do with simple CSS and some dhtml sprinkled around. Parts of the site in flash are OK though. Also, if you really want to use vector graphics, the W3C has recommended Adobe's SVG over Macromedia.

    Good design is easy if you know where things should go. Try to stay away from tables for layout purposes. Keep your content separate from the layout. You can do most of the layout stuff in CSS. That way if you want to change the site design in the future, you can just swap in a new stylesheet and not spend weeks recoding the site.

    Look up Eric Meyer in google for some awesome tips using advanced CSS.


    BTW, PHP is really nice for creating dynamic websites. You can conform to standards, because it will generate valid HTML. I've written a few sites in PHP/MySQL. If you need some help or have any design questions, feel free to ask me.

    Oh yeah, I read it as bikefag at first too....

  10. #10
    Fat Guy in Bike Shorts! manual_overide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez
    Posts
    630
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    oh DSL vs. Dialup. If you use good CSS, most of the high bandwith flash stuff will go away along with layout things that slow stuff down (background images and the like). The CSS version will be better on dialup vs the flash version, but you need to make the call as to who you will cater to.

    How many vistors do you think will really come from a dial up connection vs a broadband connection. Is your audience mostly north american? if so, you can feel safe catering to the broadband crowd, otherwise you should optimise for dialup if possible.

  11. #11
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Designing websites for a specific resolution is for noobs.
    Real websites scale to whatever browser/window size the webpage is being displayed on.

    Whenever you see a "designed for x resolution". Think noob.

  12. #12
    Meow! my58vw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Riverside, California
    My Bikes
    Trek 2100 Road Bike, Full DA10, Cervelo P2K TT bike, Full DA10, Giant Boulder Steel Commuter
    Posts
    6,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I will look into CSS, thanks. My background in this area is in designing CD based things for teaching, demonstations, etc. I just reciently started thinking about web development. I endge towards designs that are easy to use, kind of like... a 5 year old could use it type thing.

    The big issue is a web site needs to be able to display lots of information easily.

    BTW you can not auto scale a web page for photos can you? I know you can scale the web interface but pictures are fixed resolution right? Even sites like apple.com do not scale all that well...
    Just your average club rider... :)

  13. #13
    Junior Member Choob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    lol. bikefag.

  14. #14
    Chairman of the Bored catatonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)
    Posts
    5,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know...I thought it was bikefag at first too and thought "what the hell kind of drugs did he get himself into to make a website called bikefag?....I gotta see if he's willing to share!"

  15. #15
    militant commuter
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    lower manhattan
    Posts
    476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I third or fourth the bike *** bit, that is what it looked like to me. I still think it may be a good name, throwing back the insult. We called ourselves dramafags in highschool and were damn proud of it.

  16. #16
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,082
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by my58vw
    1. Campy vs Shimano
    2. Pace line edicate
    3. Bicycle Racing,

    Etc.
    Those topics will certainly draw out the trolls

  17. #17
    .
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    .
    My Bikes
    .
    Posts
    3,094
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought it said bike *** too lol! How about BikeQuestions?

  18. #18
    Senior Member kerk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    My Bikes
    2011 Raleigh International, 3 - '73 World Voyageurs, Trek 700
    Posts
    889
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BostonFixed
    I thought the domain name was bikefag.net. I was wrong.
    I thought it said bikefag also. I thought, what now? I wouldn't name it bikefaq use something else. Even bikestuff would be better.
    2011 Raleigh International
    '73 World Voyageurs -
    Proud owner of all three colors made! Orange, Blue , Yellow .

  19. #19
    primum non nocere Puppypaws's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bike *** might get a lot of hits, but not the ones you intended.

    BikePearls.net ?? (Pearls of knowledge)

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The Alta Loma area of Rancho Cucamonga. About 45 miles east of Los Angeles, California. Uphill, downhill and across hill riding; not too level!
    Posts
    1,329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Puppypaws
    Bike *** might get a lot of hits, but not the ones you intended.

    BikePearls.net ?? (Pearls of knowledge)
    Or how about "BikeFacts" or BikeFax"?
    I . . can . . . doooo . . . it

  21. #21
    Tom (ex)Builder twahl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Manassas, VA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Latest statistics say that 54% of users are at 1024 x 768 resolution, 28% at 800 x 600, and 10% at 1280 x 1024. 1% at 640 x 480, so 71% are at 1024 x 768 or better.

    For what it's worth, for all the noise you hear about alternatitive browsers, 81% are using Explorer.
    Tom

    "It hurts so good..."

  22. #22
    Avatar out of order. MarkS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    North of the border, just
    My Bikes
    Fuji Absolut '04 / Fuji 'Marlboro' Folder
    Posts
    895
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twahl
    Latest statistics say that 54% of users are at 1024 x 768 resolution, 28% at 800 x 600, and 10% at 1280 x 1024. 1% at 640 x 480, so 71% are at 1024 x 768 or better.



    For what it's worth, for all the noise you hear about alternatitive browsers, 81% are using Explorer.
    I bet these statistics are based on the *sale* of monitors, which has nothing to do what people use out there. In any event, its just arrogant to assume that everyone wants to open their browser wide and flood all 1024 pixels. What's the point of having a *windowing* system if everything has to opened up like wallpaper? If it looks good at 640, it will look good everywhere ... and fit everywhere ... probably including the new cell phone browsers that are showing up.

    There are no reliable statistics on browser use, IMHO. Many people (like myself) find that they have to force their browser to "lie" in order to get certain sites built on non-W3C compliant proprietary technologies to let them in. The other distorting factor is the caching system used by the 800 lb gorilla (AOL) and similar systems. When you go through the raw logs yourself, rather than depending on "authorities" who have a pro-MS agenda, you see that you're actually getting a great diversity of browsers and (more importantly) search engine hits. Even if you accept the 80% figure, what business is willing to lose 20% of its business just so its webmasters can play with the latest ActiveX toys?

    Sites that use Flash for their front door are just stupid. At least detect and provide an alternate home page. Even people running Windows may not have the most current version of Flash on their system, and may not even be able to install it due to work restrictions.

  23. #23
    Tom (ex)Builder twahl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Manassas, VA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry, I should have quoted my source.

    EchoEcho

    "Stats derived from:

    370.000.000 hits at
    +500.000 different sites
    during Feb, 2005"


    Obviously there's no way to accurately track what people are using, but I think it's a decent guideline. I certainly respect your opinions, but I know that I personally can't stand to have a browser use only part of my screen. Always maximized. What's the point of having several windows tiled if you can only view one of them fully anyway? I will occasionally half screen a couple of windows if I'm trying to compare something for instance, but not often.
    Tom

    "It hurts so good..."

  24. #24
    Just give'er. hooligan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    04 Scrap
    Posts
    1,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BostonFixed
    I thought the domain name was bikefag.net. I was wrong.
    Ditto.

  25. #25
    Burnt Orange Blood Longhorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Dripping Springs, Texas
    My Bikes
    Trek 7200, Lashout Electric Bike, Raleigh Talon
    Posts
    825
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe bikeQs.com? Easy to say and remember.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •