Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-05, 10:17 AM   #1
jakemoffatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Its aluminum and carbon fiber frame yield a weight of only 1500 pounds.

Its aerodynamic shape gives it a coefficient of drag of only 0.20cd. (Can someone provide something we can compare this to?)

It has an intentionally sparse interior that exposes the frame of the vehicle, much like a bicycle's frame is exposed.

It gets approximately 95 miles per gallon (or 40km/l)

It looks cool too!



http://world.honda.com/Tokyo2003/auto/imas/
jakemoffatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 10:25 AM   #2
Dahon.Steve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 6,837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Nice car. You probably would need to take out a second mortgage for it and insurance payments on that would be through the roof. Otherwise, it's a nice car.
Dahon.Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 10:30 AM   #3
jakemoffatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
Nice car. You probably would need to take out a second mortgage for it and insurance payments on that would be through the roof. Otherwise, it's a nice car.
I don't know... it is probable that Honda won't release it stateside for several years (I could be wrong) but their Insight vehicle is very similar:

1850 pounds, aluminum construction, 65mpg. Insurance for me for 6 months is $832.90. Invoice on an Insight is $20,000 or so.

One point worth mentioning is that I heard Honda is actually losing money on the Insight. I don't know what that means for the sales of the IMAS if they sell it in the USA... they may accept a loss on that car as well.
jakemoffatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 10:55 AM   #4
JBehrmann
Senior Member
 
JBehrmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Bikes: '05 Kona Kikapu, '04 Kona Jake. Really damn old Miyata 10 speed converted to singlespeed
Posts: 176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
I don't know... it is probable that Honda won't release it stateside for several years (I could be wrong) but their Insight vehicle is very similar:

1850 pounds, aluminum construction, 65mpg. Insurance for me for 6 months is $832.90. Invoice on an Insight is $20,000 or so.

One point worth mentioning is that I heard Honda is actually losing money on the Insight. I don't know what that means for the sales of the IMAS if they sell it in the USA... they may accept a loss on that car as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honda's Press Release
Concept Vehicle Stage

Honda will present its ideas for the future in a lineup of intriguing concept vehicles: the HSC which offers the driving pleasure of a sports car in a package that anyone can handle; the IMAS, a lightweight aerodynamic hybrid sports car...
This isn't an actual car, and won't be for sale ever. It looks interesting though I couldn't get excited about driving with an exposed frame. Get in an accident and it would likely mess you up that much worse.
JBehrmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 10:56 AM   #5
Cyclon
2 Wheel Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 347
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It does look like an Insight. Funny, I just saw an Insight on the freeway today that was going in excess of 80mph. It tried to pace it, but I stopped after a certain point.
Cyclon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 11:05 AM   #6
jakemoffatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclon
It does look like an Insight. Funny, I just saw an Insight on the freeway today that was going in excess of 80mph. It tried to pace it, but I stopped after a certain point.
What, were you on your bike or something?
jakemoffatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 11:14 AM   #7
Medpilot
BOATS AND HOES!
 
Medpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Bikes: Madone
Posts: 666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
Its aerodynamic shape gives it a coefficient of drag of only 0.20cd. (Can someone provide something we can compare this to?)
That's pretty aero. I remember the Honda CRX having a CD of around .29
Medpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 11:34 AM   #8
slvoid
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
 
slvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Posts: 15,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
I don't know... it is probable that Honda won't release it stateside for several years (I could be wrong) but their Insight vehicle is very similar:

1850 pounds, aluminum construction, 65mpg. Insurance for me for 6 months is $832.90. Invoice on an Insight is $20,000 or so.

One point worth mentioning is that I heard Honda is actually losing money on the Insight. I don't know what that means for the sales of the IMAS if they sell it in the USA... they may accept a loss on that car as well.
That's pretty light. The mclaren F1's about 350 lbs heavier but it seats 3, gets around 20mpg, and has a 620bhp V12 with an aero coeff of 0.3.
slvoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 11:38 AM   #9
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
The 2nd generation Toyota Prius has a .26 Cd

The Honda Insight has a .25 Cd.

These are some of the lowest for production cars.

Al
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 11:56 AM   #10
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBehrmann
This isn't an actual car, and won't be for sale ever. It looks interesting though I couldn't get excited about driving with an exposed frame. Get in an accident and it would likely mess you up that much worse.
It's most likely not passive bodywork on a tube-frame, that's old-school 1970s stuff. Looks like monocoque construction which yields the highest strenght-to-weight ratio. Probably uses aluminium for bolt-on attachment points for engine, bumpers, suspension, seats, etc and carbon-fibre to connect those alloy pieces. Similar to the Mclaren or Enzo construction methods.
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 01:39 PM   #11
JBehrmann
Senior Member
 
JBehrmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Bikes: '05 Kona Kikapu, '04 Kona Jake. Really damn old Miyata 10 speed converted to singlespeed
Posts: 176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
It's most likely not passive bodywork on a tube-frame, that's old-school 1970s stuff. Looks like monocoque construction which yields the highest strenght-to-weight ratio. Probably uses aluminium for bolt-on attachment points for engine, bumpers, suspension, seats, etc and carbon-fibre to connect those alloy pieces. Similar to the Mclaren or Enzo construction methods.
I just like having something between me and the part of the car that would absorb energy from an impact. Even crate paper would be nice, then I wouldn't have to look at it and worry about crumple fragments flying into my eyes
JBehrmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 02:16 PM   #12
ninjaRoller
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
hoping this will become the new honda insight..

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
Its aluminum and carbon fiber frame yield a weight of only 1500 pounds.

Its aerodynamic shape gives it a coefficient of drag of only 0.20cd. (Can someone provide something we can compare this to?)

It has an intentionally sparse interior that exposes the frame of the vehicle, much like a bicycle's frame is exposed.

It gets approximately 95 miles per gallon (or 40km/l)

It looks cool too!



http://world.honda.com/Tokyo2003/auto/imas/
ninjaRoller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 02:41 PM   #13
jakemoffatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slvoid
That's pretty light. The mclaren F1's about 350 lbs heavier but it seats 3, gets around 20mpg, and has a 620bhp V12 with an aero coeff of 0.3.
If you are saying the F1 is heavier than an Insight... just think of what you could do with this car...

You could put a nice turboed Hayabusa engine in it... like they did:

http://zcars.org.uk/ultima/index.htm

They put dual Hayabusa motorcycle engines in a (finished weight) 980KG car for a BHP of 1000.

So I'm assuming you could pull 500BHP out of one engine?

I don't know how much those engines weigh but we could say 500lbs (They go in motorcycles, this is probably way over the actual weight).

So remove about 300 lbs from your base of 1500lbs for the stock engine, and add 500lbs, and you have an 1800lb vehicle with 500bhp and a cd of 0.20. Freakin insane. Of course, you would have to make some other adjustments as well, like adding some really awesome brakes, and you'd probably need a non-stock transmission. Well... you'd also need an electric motor in there so you could go in reverse.

But that's pretty crazy potential for a mad-crazy-fast vehicle. Almost or better than F1 specs at probably half to a third or quarter of the price.

But that would require someone who had a clue about autos and what they were doing. Not me.

Oh... and some money.

And I forgot... that would also kind of destroy the whole point of this vehicle: to get insane crazy gas mileage.
jakemoffatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 02:52 PM   #14
jakemoffatt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'll bet it has a sealed undercarriage.
jakemoffatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 03:12 PM   #15
slvoid
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
 
slvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Posts: 15,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
You could put a nice turboed Hayabusa engine in it... like they did:
And the mclaren would be comfortable, safe, seat more, handle better, and not kill me.
slvoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 03:28 PM   #16
konageezer
Gravel for Breakfast
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Inside my scabs
Bikes: Jake
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Honda company actually started out with bicycles.

Therefore, ALL of their cars have been designed after a bicycle.

(Just looking for trouble.)
konageezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 03:30 PM   #17
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"I don't know how much those engines weigh but we could say 500lbs (They go in motorcycles, this is probably way over the actual weight)."

Stock Busa motor weighs about 175lbs... Add about 50-lbs for the extra plumbing of turbos.
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 05:14 PM   #18
Cyclon
2 Wheel Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 347
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
What, were you on your bike or something?
Of course I was on my bike. I was drafting behind the Insight! hahaha




Naw, I was driving my car.
Cyclon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 05:21 PM   #19
Cyclon
2 Wheel Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 347
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
So remove about 300 lbs from your base of 1500lbs for the stock engine, and add 500lbs, and you have an 1800lb vehicle with 500bhp and a cd of 0.20. Freakin insane.

But that's pretty crazy potential for a mad-crazy-fast vehicle. Almost or better than F1 specs at probably half to a third or quarter of the price.
There is the Ariel Atom. Not the most aerodynamic, but that thing is fast with it's great power to weight ratio. Weighs 456kg and has a Honda 1.8L VTEC engine. 220BHP.

Rumor has it, it's going to be sold in the US and may come with a 2.4L engine.
Cyclon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 05:29 PM   #20
Eatadonut
You know you want to.
 
Eatadonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Bikes: Pinarello Prince, 1980's 531 steel fixie commuter, FrankenMTB
Posts: 1,896
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakemoffatt
Its aerodynamic shape gives it a coefficient of drag of only 0.20cd. (Can someone provide something we can compare this to?)


It gets approximately 95 miles per gallon (or 40km/l)

BMW put together a turbodeisel that has a drag coeff. of .14. It moves pretty well, and gets about 90 mpg.

They have no plans to release it. Just proving that they can do gas milage too, they just dun wanna.
__________________
Weather today: Hot. Humid. Potholes.
Eatadonut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-05, 05:39 PM   #21
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclon
There is the Ariel Atom. Not the most aerodynamic, but that thing is fast with it's great power to weight ratio. Weighs 456kg and has a Honda 1.8L VTEC engine. 220BHP.

Rumor has it, it's going to be sold in the US and may come with a 2.4L engine.
Then there's the Lotus Elise and Exige. I did the 2001 OTC where there was a Lotus Elise and 340R. They kicked butt!!! I would imagine the Exige can offer Ferrari-F40/Enzo levels of performance...
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-05, 03:52 PM   #22
JBehrmann
Senior Member
 
JBehrmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Bikes: '05 Kona Kikapu, '04 Kona Jake. Really damn old Miyata 10 speed converted to singlespeed
Posts: 176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclon
There is the Ariel Atom. Not the most aerodynamic, but that thing is fast with it's great power to weight ratio. Weighs 456kg and has a Honda 1.8L VTEC engine. 220BHP.

Rumor has it, it's going to be sold in the US and may come with a 2.4L engine.
How would that come close to passing even 10% of American safety requirements. Don't get me wrong, seeing the Atom in the USA would be awesome, but if it did make it I doubt it would be the same car.
JBehrmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-05, 04:23 PM   #23
Cyclon
2 Wheel Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 347
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBehrmann
How would that come close to passing even 10% of American safety requirements. Don't get me wrong, seeing the Atom in the USA would be awesome, but if it did make it I doubt it would be the same car.
Perhaps it will be limited to track use only? I dunno. Or perhaps it'll come into the States as a "kit car"??
Cyclon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-05, 06:34 PM   #24
badcompany9
Happy cat.
 
badcompany9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by konageezer
The Honda company actually started out with bicycles.

Therefore, ALL of their cars have been designed after a bicycle.

(Just looking for trouble.)
Actually, Honda originally made engines that were installed onto bike frames, not bicycles themselves.
badcompany9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-05, 09:36 PM   #25
edp773
Senior Member
 
edp773's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinios
Bikes: 2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo
Posts: 1,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My 1985 Honda CRX HI got 51 MPG. It used less gas than my Honda motorcycle. The motorcycle only got 44 MPG. Some impressive technology for 1985.
edp773 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 AM.