Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    WWE Champion
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Detroit Rock City
    My Bikes
    1988 REI Special BananaBike
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Clydesdale Brooks Recommendation?

    Hello,

    I am a newbie, looking for a new seat for my bike. I'm considering the Brooks line since they are so highly recommended here along with a couple of others. I am a clydesdale rider, 6'5", >270lbs. Which model of Brooks should I be looking at? Is the base B17 adequate? I don't mind spending the extra $$ if it is worthwhile for the proper seat.

    Thanks for any help

  2. #2
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seats are a very personal choice. What works for one anatomy may well not for another. As a clyde myself I run the Team Pro and am quite happy with it. The B-17 is a bit wider and has also worked for me in the past. I'd shy away from the Ti rail Swallow model.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  3. #3
    .
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    .
    My Bikes
    .
    Posts
    3,094
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The B17 is considered by sellers to be the least-returned, least complained about, saddle. I have a b17 and a team pro, they're both good, I'd say you can't go wrong with the B17.

  4. #4
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would anyone like to give some input on the sprung models for Clydesdales?

  5. #5
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,258
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi,
    I have the Flyer and the B67. The Flyer is just a B17 with springs.
    It was giving me hip and low back pain. I got the B67, and if I can survive the break in, I can notice an improvement so far with the hips and back.

    You should also consider the titanium railed B17 if you are under 200 pounds.

    My 2 cents is that if you have your bars roughly even with the saddle, the B17 often works. If the bars are more than an inch or two higher go with one of the wider ones. Maybe. If you are using a roadie position, one of the more agressive saddles might be the ticket. I am switching from roadie rims to touring rims, and putting on wider tires to boot. I may switch back to the Flyer in the spring to see if that helps. But for now I am using the B67.
    Just so you know, a couple weeks ago i did 66 miles on the Flyer.
    I couldn't have done that on most saddles.

  6. #6
    Senior Curmudgeon
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Directly above the center of the earth
    My Bikes
    Electra Townie 1-speed with basket & fenders
    Posts
    3,305
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got a B-17 and a B-69. I use the 69 on the bike with the more upright seating, the 17 on the "racer." Both are comfortable for my 6'2", 255# self.

  7. #7
    Humvee of bikes =Worksman Nightshade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,278
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The right seat is matter of minding your riding position as
    your hips and "sit" bones rotate the more upright you sit.

    That said, I've always liked a wide spring seat for "cruiser"
    style riding while a more "aero" ride felt better on a narrow
    seat.

  8. #8
    WWE Champion
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Detroit Rock City
    My Bikes
    1988 REI Special BananaBike
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the info everyone. I should have given a little more info. I have a comfort bike that I ride sitting up with my handlebars well above my seat. So, would a brooks with a spring (Flyer) be appropriate and strong enough to hold my 270lb weight? Or would a B17 be the right choice from Brooks? Am I missing one? Price isn't a real issue - I just want a seat that will last under my weight that is appropriate for my situation.

    Thanks for your help

  9. #9
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both will serve you well. Your weight is of NO CONCERN with these models. It boils down to personal preference. The difference between the two saddles mentioned is the spring action. Suspension in the seatpost of rear of the bike? get the regular (B 17). Have suspension for the rear in one spot: Saddle, post, rear frame. You pick which.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  10. #10
    Macaws Rock! michaelnel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    My Bikes
    2005 Soma Doublecross
    Posts
    1,513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6' / 250lbs here. Currently using a B17, have used B17 and Team Pro in the past. Team Pro was better on a bike I had with a more hunched over position, B17 better for more upright.

    Both very comfy.

    I have never owned or ridden a sprung Brooks. I'd like to sometime.
    ---

    San Francisco, California

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    686
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been running a Conquest on my mountain bike for the last 15 or so years(I can't exactly recall but it was the year they started making them!).
    Highly recommended for upright styles.

  12. #12
    Humvee of bikes =Worksman Nightshade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,278
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet
    Thanks for the info everyone. I should have given a little more info. I have a comfort bike that I ride sitting up with my handlebars well above my seat. So, would a brooks with a spring (Flyer) be appropriate and strong enough to hold my 270lb weight? Or would a B17 be the right choice from Brooks? Am I missing one? Price isn't a real issue - I just want a seat that will last under my weight that is appropriate for my situation.

    Thanks for your help
    Look at the Brooks that have springs rear & springs front and rear for "Cruiser style" upright
    riding. I ride on a springs at rear Brooks B67 that does fine on my utility bike.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Dougmt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Middle of Montana
    My Bikes
    1996 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't comment on the sprung brooks as I've never ridden one but I REALLY like my B-17 and I'm 6'2" - 259 pounds. My seat "broke-in" very quickly. I will never buy another seat.. well, maybe a Ti, swift, in British Green for my color shifting Raleigh R600 :-)
    D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •