Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Jubalayo Unogwaja! Bokkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bollocks!
    Posts
    1,089
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    GPS - the ultimate yuppie toy?

    Guys, I think I might have been through this a while back, but I got chatting to a chap I know about the problem I've had getting a reliable computer setup on my Gemini. I don't want to get into the use/don't use, need/don't need discussion of the pros/cons of bike cimputers but he mentioned an interesting angle about the use of GPS to do the same.

    As he explained it to me. Bill Clinton scrapped Selective Availability when he left office. That eliminated the GPS signal scrambling that varied its accuracy around +/- 50m and most units are now better than 3m accuracy. The UK Ordnance Survey uses a 6 digit reference, like TQ401354 but the accuracy of the GPS units now give a 10 digit accuracy, like TQ4018935472. I digress.

    There are GPS units that also display altitude. Take a map, draw a straight line, disregard contour intervals, and all you have is a straight line distance. A bike computer would do a reasonably good job of the true distance travelled. An altitude GPS unit should in theory be able to do the same. Ignoring cost, battery life, and other issues, has anyone actually used one in such a context?

    I have a reason for asking. The OS maps, like all maps, are never as uptodate as you'd sometimes like them to be. The UK Forestry Commission is quite tolerant about people riding on their land, providing you don't stray into areas that are unsafe, such as where they are doing felling/logging operations. The forest tracks change. Some fall into 'disuse', and new ones open. Maps can't keep up with that. GPS though, if you use accurate coordinates, will let you add the course of tracks to the maps, and that might be useful for exchanging routes with your pals.

    Any idea or comments about this?

    Have you used GPS in such a case?

    Or is still just a yuppie toy?
    If your bollocks ain't sore, yer ain't on yer boike!

  2. #2
    bici accumulatori pinerider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario
    My Bikes
    1982 Steve Bauer road bike, 1985 Custom Campy road bike, 1985 Nishiki International Touring Bike, 1992 Norco Bigfoot MTB, 1975 Raleigh Twenty folder, 1992 Vitus 979 road bike, 1996 Bianchi Premio road bike, 2002 Thin Blue LIne CO2 mountain bike,
    Posts
    853
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a GPS unit at work that provides horizontal accuracy to within about 3 or 4 feet (1-1.5metres). It cost about $10,000 CDN. It's vertical accuracy is around 30' or 10 metres.
    Generally GPS really sucks for vertical information.
    ...!

  3. #3
    Jubalayo Unogwaja! Bokkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bollocks!
    Posts
    1,089
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Generally GPS really sucks for vertical information
    That's quite close to what I'd heard as well. I was not sure if it was just a single opinion, but you've confirmed that there are still some questions about it.
    If your bollocks ain't sore, yer ain't on yer boike!

  4. #4
    cycle-powered nathank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
    My Bikes
    '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
    Posts
    1,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    as far a altitude, GPS is not so great... b/c the satellites are pretty high up, 3 can be used to get a decent 2-d location and 4 a pretty precise measure. i think it's minimum 4 for altitude and then it's often bad b/c the sattilites may all be near each other and are all obviously above you, so the triangulation error is MUCH higher than for 2-d positioning. that said, IF you can locate enough satellites, in theory the Altitude should be good enough for what you are wanting - i think +/- 50m or so

    as i understand, for really accurate altitude measurements a fixed ground reference point is created and then with this AND the satellites GPS can get a really good GPS measure --- i think this is what is used in site plotting and other precise-measurement things --- but not cheap and not fast

    There are GPS units that also display altitude. Take a map, draw a straight line, disregard contour intervals, and all you have is a straight line distance. A bike computer would do a reasonably good job of the true distance travelled. An altitude GPS unit should in theory be able to do the same. Ignoring cost, battery life, and other issues, has anyone actually used one in such a context?
    so i'm not sure that i understand you question: so you're asking if a GPS could be used to measure NOT the 2-D distance but the true 3-D "distance travelled"? first, unless you're in a really mountainous area i don't think the elevation difference from 2 points will matter much so just computing from start-end won't work. So what you're really asking is if the GPS can use real-time 3-D measurement to compute "true 3-D distance" travelled? if so, in theory it shouldn't be too hard to do, but i don't know of any GPS that does and of course you have the problem similar to the barometric Altimeter vertical counting devices that you have to define a metric and it makes a big difference whether 5m or 10cm "counts" as vertical change... (for instance, i have 3, a Sunto, a Ciclo and a Cateye and they all use different methods and the Cateye ends up counting about twice the actual vertical change while the Suunto seems to be a little high (like 2%) and the Ciclo a little low (like 3%))
    why drive when you can ride?
    now a fully certified German MTB Guide! (DAV)

  5. #5
    Jubalayo Unogwaja! Bokkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bollocks!
    Posts
    1,089
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so i'm not sure that i understand you question: so you're asking if a GPS could be used to measure NOT the 2-D distance but the true 3-D "distance travelled"? first, unless you're in a really mountainous area i don't think the elevation difference from 2 points will matter much so just computing from start-end won't work. So what you're really asking is if the GPS can use real-time 3-D measurement to compute "true 3-D distance" travelled? if so, in theory it shouldn't be too hard to do, but i don't know of any GPS that does and of course you have the problem similar to the barometric Altimeter vertical counting devices that you have to define a metric and it makes a big difference whether 5m or 10cm "counts" as vertical change
    That's what I was getting at. Could a GPS unit replace an existing bike computer? I know some/all GPS units let you review the course (waypoints) travelled? But I'm not sure if that is an automatic recording, like saving current position every 30 seconds, for example, or if you have to record it manually by pressing a button to record the snapshot?

    Bike computers are not as accurate as we'd like ot think they are. If you set the computer with the wheel circumference then that might change a bit when you are sitting are on the bike, and it might also change again depending on tire pressure, though I think the difference in a typical 26" wheel will not be too noticeable?

    I see GPS eliminating the calibration/mechanical aspects of existing bike computer distance recording, but it now seems if you opt for GPS, then you introduce different problems into the calculations.
    If your bollocks ain't sore, yer ain't on yer boike!

  6. #6
    bici accumulatori pinerider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario
    My Bikes
    1982 Steve Bauer road bike, 1985 Custom Campy road bike, 1985 Nishiki International Touring Bike, 1992 Norco Bigfoot MTB, 1975 Raleigh Twenty folder, 1992 Vitus 979 road bike, 1996 Bianchi Premio road bike, 2002 Thin Blue LIne CO2 mountain bike,
    Posts
    853
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another problem with GPS is it measures distances in straight lines only. You would have to make a waypoint at every curve and intersection along the route to get an accurate distance. A bike computer measures the actual distance travelled.
    ...!

  7. #7
    Jubalayo Unogwaja! Bokkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bollocks!
    Posts
    1,089
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another problem with GPS is it measures distances in straight lines only. You would have to make a waypoint at every curve and intersection along the route to get an accurate distance. A bike computer measures the actual distance travelled.
    That was my concern. Do GPS units record the waypoint by themselves, or do I have to punch a button to record it? Different makes and models do different things. I notice that Garmin make a unit called eTrek Summit that does vertical calculations but to a climber, distance is not so relevant.

    I'd like to see the straight line distance measurement represent the 3D view not just the 2D.
    If your bollocks ain't sore, yer ain't on yer boike!

  8. #8
    cycle-powered nathank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
    My Bikes
    '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
    Posts
    1,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hmm... yeah i think theoretically it could work but i don't know of any current GPS device that calculates 3-D distance... there are also some with integrated barometric altimeters which i think qould be a better solution for this type of thing.

    yes, i think there are GPSs that automatically tkae sample points (i think my eTrex does so every few seconds) and this is really only a memory/battery issue --- a GPS could sample a few times a second and store it all if you have the memory and battery.

    so i think it would all work, it would just be a matter of someone developing and testing the unit... and i'm not sure if there's really much of a market for such a thing...

    but yes, i think it is likely in the not-too-distant future that we will all have GPS units on our bikes or wrists...

    i haven't used mine much on the bike, (Garmin eTrex), but the 2-D speed is pretty cool in either a car or on the bike... i've actually thought of calibrating my bike computer via the GPS but i was too lazy to really do it...
    why drive when you can ride?
    now a fully certified German MTB Guide! (DAV)

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Montreal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
    Posts
    6,521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I saw a review recently of a watch (Timex I think) that used GPS signals to continuously calculate current speed, distance etc. The idea is that you can use it regardless of which bike you are riding or even if you are running. At $400 it looks like a very sophisticated solution to something that isnt a problem. It wont tell you your current position.

  10. #10
    Jubalayo Unogwaja! Bokkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bollocks!
    Posts
    1,089
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i think my eTrex does so every few seconds
    Which one do you use? I see there are about four or five in the eTrek range.
    If your bollocks ain't sore, yer ain't on yer boike!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •