Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel

 Bike Forums > Square or round?
 Username Remember Me? Password
 Register All Albums Elite Membership Forum Rules Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

 Thread Tools Search this Thread
 11-02-05, 10:49 AM #1 Siu Blue Wind I don't think so Thread Starter     Join Date: Apr 2005 Bikes: Posts: 11,230 Mentioned: 15 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 442 Post(s) Square or round? Just out of curiosity.... Which is stronger - the square tube frames that companies like Specialized and Kona are using or the traditional round tubing? I always thought round was structurally stronger but it seems newer designs are leaning more towards square.
 11-02-05, 11:13 AM #2 DannoXYZ  Senior Member     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Saratoga, CA Bikes: Posts: 11,621 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 15 Post(s) It depends upon the direction of the load. Strength-to-weight in lateral bending is good with round. But you get much better rigidity/stiffness torsionally with square-tubing of the same diameter at a slight cost in weight. The equations governing thin-wall tubing is as follows: Maximum Torsional Stress = T/2*t*Ar where: T= Torque t = wall thickness Ar = cross-sectional area enclosed by the centerline of the tube Ar for a circular section would be pi*r^2 Ar for a square section would be b^2 (b is the length of the side) Last edited by DannoXYZ; 11-02-05 at 11:22 AM.
11-02-05, 11:23 AM   #3
TexasGuy
That darn Yankee

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West West Fort Worth
Bikes: Mongoose XR-100, Eros Bianchi
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by DannoXYZ It depends upon the direction of the load. Strength-to-weight in lateral bending is good with round. But you get much better rigidity/stiffness torsionally with square-tubing of the same diameter at a slight cost in weight. The equations governing thin-wall tubing is as follows: Maximum Torsional Stress = T/2*t*Ar where: T= Torque t = wall thickness Ar = cross-sectional area enclosed by the centerline of the tube Ar for a circular section would be pi*r^2 Ar for a square section would be b^2 (b is the length of the side)
scuse me sir but why couldnt you put diagrams to go with this too
__________________
Life is about hanging onto what you think is important and finding out what really is important.
"Stop Ruining my joke!", "No, a joke implies humor attached at no additional cost"
So many sayings, so little sig space.

 11-02-05, 11:30 AM #4 eubi No Rocket Surgeon     Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Corona and S. El Monte, CA Bikes: Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7 Posts: 1,648 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) It depends on how it is expected to be loaded. The bending stress in a beam is given by: Stress = M*y/Ixx Where M is the bending Moment y is the distance from the neutral axis Ixx is the second moment of inertia of the beam along the xx bending axis The resistance to bending stress in a beam is determined by what engineers call the second moment of inertia of the beam. When you bend a beam, the stress is highest as you move from the bending axis of the section. The reason for an "I" beam to be shaped the way it is is that it has a lot of material at the top and bottom to better resist the bending stresses. This way it is strong but light. Square tubing can be made to simulate the stress distribution you would see in an "I" beam. Thicker material at the top and bottom, with thinner material on the sides. You have light weight, and material where you need it. The down side to this wonderful I beam is if it is subjected to the same bending load in another direction, it will be highly stressed. Now the second moment of inertia will be Iyy. From the equation, if Iyy is less than Ixx, you can see the stress will be higher. On the other hand, you can put a bending load on a tube from any direction and the stress will be the same. Ixx = Iyy. I know this is probably clear as mud. We really need some diagrams and manipulatives to illustrate it better. Try this: Take a yard stick and bend it across its long side. Hard, huh? Now bend it across its short side. Much easier, right? The amount of material is the same, but depending on you you orient it, it can be made to resist bending better. Now take a piece of PVC pipe. It will bend the same no matter how you bend it. Let's not even talk about when happens when you twist a square or rectangular tube!
11-02-05, 04:21 PM   #5
Retro Grouch
Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Posts: 27,467
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 440 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Siu Blue Wind Just out of curiosity.... Which is stronger - the square tube frames that companies like Specialized and Kona are using or the traditional round tubing? I always thought round was structurally stronger but it seems newer designs are leaning more towards square.
I don't know but I'll bet that the square tube designs are cheaper to build. Everytime that I learn about some new great idea for a bike frame, it turns out that it's easier and cheaper to build.

 11-02-05, 04:44 PM #6 DannoXYZ  Senior Member     Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Saratoga, CA Bikes: Posts: 11,621 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 15 Post(s) I'd like to see bike tubes that go from triangular to round to square to deal with the different stresses at different ends of each tube. And the chainstays actually do need to be ovalized laterally rather than vertically....
11-02-05, 11:17 PM   #7
Siu Blue Wind
I don't think so
Thread Starter

Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 11,230
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 442 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Retro Grouch I don't know but I'll bet that the square tube designs are cheaper to build. Everytime that I learn about some new great idea for a bike frame, it turns out that it's easier and cheaper to build.

By cheaper do you mean because of the design or less material involved?

11-02-05, 11:22 PM   #8
Siu Blue Wind
I don't think so
Thread Starter

Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 11,230
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 442 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by eubi It depends on how it is expected to be loaded. The bending stress in a beam is given by: Stress = M*y/Ixx Where M is the bending Moment y is the distance from the neutral axis Ixx is the second moment of inertia of the beam along the xx bending axis The resistance to bending stress in a beam is determined by what engineers call the second moment of inertia of the beam. When you bend a beam, the stress is highest as you move from the bending axis of the section. The reason for an "I" beam to be shaped the way it is is that it has a lot of material at the top and bottom to better resist the bending stresses. This way it is strong but light. Square tubing can be made to simulate the stress distribution you would see in an "I" beam. Thicker material at the top and bottom, with thinner material on the sides. You have light weight, and material where you need it. The down side to this wonderful I beam is if it is subjected to the same bending load in another direction, it will be highly stressed. Now the second moment of inertia will be Iyy. From the equation, if Iyy is less than Ixx, you can see the stress will be higher. On the other hand, you can put a bending load on a tube from any direction and the stress will be the same. Ixx = Iyy. I know this is probably clear as mud. We really need some diagrams and manipulatives to illustrate it better. Try this: Take a yard stick and bend it across its long side. Hard, huh? Now bend it across its short side. Much easier, right? The amount of material is the same, but depending on you you orient it, it can be made to resist bending better. Now take a piece of PVC pipe. It will bend the same no matter how you bend it. Let's not even talk about when happens when you twist a square or rectangular tube!

So are you saying that a DJ bike would be better with square and maybe an XC would be better with round? Are there any square road bikes? Or (that sounded funny) any road bikes with square tubing, despite weight?

11-03-05, 07:22 AM   #9
eubi
No Rocket Surgeon

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Corona and S. El Monte, CA
Bikes: Cannondale D600, Dahon Speed T7
Posts: 1,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Siu Blue Wind So are you saying that a DJ bike would be better with square and maybe an XC would be better with round? Are there any square road bikes? Or (that sounded funny) any road bikes with square tubing, despite weight?
I don't think so...what is a DJ and XC bike?

Sorry, I'm just a clueless commuter on a Cannondale.

I would tend to want to build a bike with round to oval tubing. When you add the corners things get strange in torsion. I can think of no benefit to using square tubing on a bike.

Also, when it comes to manufacturing, round is the easiest to produce.

Those square hole drills are expensive!

11-03-05, 12:19 PM   #10
DannoXYZ
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by eubi I would tend to want to build a bike with round to oval tubing. When you add the corners things get strange in torsion. I can think of no benefit to using square tubing on a bike.
Yeah, I really like how the Serottas have tubing that changes diameter and are ovalized in different directions. The seattube gets fatter as it goes down to the BB. Both it and the downtube are ovalized laterally to resist sideways forces from pedaling. And the downtube is ovalized vertically where it meets the headtube. Pretty neat.

 11-03-05, 12:31 PM #11 Ritehsedad Tail End Charlie     Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Maine, The Way Life Should Be Bikes: Fuji Nevada MTB, Giant OCR1 Posts: 545 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s) If you're talking about the tube cross section, generally speaking a circle is going to be stronger than square of the same (or even greater) cross-sectional area. I believe that a lot of the square or diamond shape tube cross sections are intended to be more aerodynamic. __________________ Why isn't 11 pronounced onety one?

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 PM.

 -- BikeForums -- Mobile One Contact Us - Bike Forums - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Terms of Service - Top

• Ask a Question
get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.