Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-06, 11:43 PM   #1
Da Big Kahuna
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 814
Gearing possibilities

My biggest concern when I bought my Felt F-35 was the fact that it had a double chainring instead of a triple. I wanted the double - all the doubles I rode just seemed to shift better - but I didn't know if I would have trouble with the big hills. I did have the cassette changed to give me a 27 rather than a 23 and this has been useful (the front is 39 & 53).

I can still use some lower gearing though and have been thinking about changing my setup when I need to replace the cassette anyway (I have over 13,000 on it so far). I thought about a ten speed if I can get lower. Some people have said I could only get to a 23, others a 25. On the front, some have said maybe I could go to a 38.

Today, one guy at the shop said I could get a 11/27 cassette in a ten speed and a 34/50 chainring. I haven't done the math yet, but it seems this would make my highest gear just a little lower, but make my lowest gear at least somewhat noticeably better.

But with all the different things people have told me, I thought I'd ask here - would this combination work? Is it possible to get an even bigger gear on the rear to help without going to a mountain bike derailer?
TheRCF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 01:02 AM   #2
Gonzo Bob
cycles per second
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: Vitus Aluminum, DiamondBack Apex, Softride Powerwing 700, "Generic" Ishiwata 022, Trek OCLV 110
Posts: 1,790
10-speed won't get you lower gears.

Three possibilities in increasing gear change and cost...

1) Customize your cassette to 12-30. Buy a loose 30T hyperglide cog, take out the loose 14T cog and its spacer from your current cassette, put on the 30T with the spacer, and put on the rest of the cogs from the 12-27. If you don't want to do the customizing, Harris Cyclery sells them already customized ( but they have a 13-30 instead of a 12-30. This will give you a gear about 10% lower. If you already have 10-speed, you can't do this because they don't make cogs bigger than 27T for 10-speed yet.

2) Go with the 50x34 compact crankset. This will give you a gear about 13% lower.

3) Triple crankset to get a gear that is 20-30% lower (depends on the granny ring you choose).
Gonzo Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 06:03 PM   #3
Da Big Kahuna
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 814
Hmmm, I was kinda hoping that it would let me get a little bit bigger cog on the rear with a 10 speed (every little bit helps).

I don't know if I can actually go bigger on the rear though, even with my present setup, without a derailer change. I know when I put the 27 on, some people thought it would work, but some weren't sure. Even when I wrote to the Felt company, they weren't sure. But it did work. Bigger may push me past the limits. I really don't know how to figure those things out.

Right now, based on your comments, I think the compact setup might work best.

Near as I can tell, the 34 in front would be virtually the same as putting a 31 on the rear - a full gear lower, roughly.

Of course, with a 12/27 like I have now, I lose a little on my highest gear - I do use that sometimes, mostly downhill though. But if I can go with an 11/27, my highest gear is a little higher.

Only negative I can think of is the same one I get when I went from the 23 to the 27 - the gears are more widely spaced, making it harder to find the "ideal" gear in some situations. Might be worth it though.

Would I be correct that the front crank couldn't have a wider difference than 34/50 without having problems?

As I said, I really prefer a double rather than going for a triple. It just feels more solid to me.


TheRCF is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:04 AM.