Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member Falchoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    887
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Helmets - what's the difference?

    There seems to be a big range of prices that one can pay for a cycle helmet. They seem to range from around $30 up to several hundred dollars! What does a $200 helmet do that a $30 one doesn't? Spare me the $2 head , $2 helmet jokes...
    If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving definitely isn't for you.

  2. #2
    Senior Member RacerX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Left Coast
    Posts
    1,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    More expensive helmets have more advanced retention features like Specialized's Brain Trust 2 system. They have more expensive manufacturing processes to mold the hardshell and styro together or more as one unit. Cheap helmets usually have the hardshell "skin" stuck on top of the styro.

    They have more sophisticated and better looking graphics, materials, finish and are usually the best a particular company can make.

    Proper fit and comfort are most important as any foam helmet will protect about the same. However, an ill-fitting helmet will not do it's job so if you can only get a good fit with a $100 helmet, buy it. If you get a comfortable helmet you like that fits well for $30, than buy that.

  3. #3
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    200$ helmets are usually full faced. That should be a self explained advantage.

    Expensive roadie helmets may be more aerodynamic but since I don't care about pure speed in that capacity I don't do the research

    Cheap helmets usually have less whole / ventilation which is a big thing to some people. Style too. I find cheaper helmets 'generally' make people look very phalyc.

    As for protection. Not a diff, they are all standard.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,669
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by Maelstrom
    As for protection. Not a diff, they are all standard.
    I will take issue here. It is true that they all have the same minimum protection standard, but that standard does not tell anything about how much the helmet exceeds that standard.

    I was stupid one time and messed up a $50 helmet with some solvent based glue. I decided to get another helmet and eventually used the damaged helmet for some backyard testing.

    I can safely report that the higher end helmets with the bonded microshell (like most companies higher end road and mountain helmets) will stay together after an impact. The polystyrene will crack, but the bonded shell holds the pieces together. This effectively means that if the helmet is still held in place on the head after an impact, it will still be around to absorb a second (in a different spot of course).

    I also know that a helmet with a taped shell will shatter on impact and is not around to absorb another blow as my father (John Ratliff who also posts here) found out when he had his recent accident.

    This is one of the problems with the bike helmet industry. Since the design of all helmets are carried out by private companies, the companies are hardly in a position to say whether one helmet in their line is better than another, much less how much better. All they can say is that all their helmets pass a minimum standard. Thus the consumer has no information about which helmet to buy other than vague statements like "best used for road," and price.

    I have seen protection ratings for laptop computer bags, but could you imagine trying to choose between a "superior protection" $150 helmet verses a "minimum protection" $20 helmet if you are tight on a budget?
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    upstate New York
    Posts
    1,688
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One of the major reasons that the expensive helmets (some Giros, especially) cost so much is advertising! They spend many $$ sponsoring teams in order to have their name seen.
    Several years ago, Consumer Reports tested the protection of various bike helmets (not the style or durability, though). The highest rated helmets were the cheapest, taped-on-cap style Bell helmets, costing about $30 each. Many of the high-zoot $100+ helmets were rated not acceptable, due to chinstrap latches that failed in testing.
    Je vais à vélo, donc je suis!

  6. #6
    The Flying Scot chewa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    North Queensferry Scotland and London (and France)
    My Bikes
    Custom (Colin Laing) 531c fast tourer/audax, 1964 Flying Scot Continental, 1995 Cinelli Supercorsa, Holdsworth Mistral single speed, Dahon Speed 6 (folder), Micmo Sirocco and a few more
    Posts
    1,903
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    More buys you less. Weight that is, with better ventilation.

    Other than that it's largely a style thing, but all the previous posts are correct at least to some degree
    plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens

    1985 Sandy Gilchrist-Colin Laing built 531c Audax/fast tourer.
    1964 Flying Scot Continental (531)
    1995 Cinelli Supercorsa (Columbus SLX)
    1980s Holdsworth Mistral fixed (531)
    2005 Dahon Speed 6 (folder)
    (YES I LIKE STEEL)
    2008 Viking Saratoga tandem
    2008 Micmo Sirocco Hybrid (aluminium!)
    2012 BTwin Rockrider 8.1

  7. #7
    human velocipedio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    living in the moment
    My Bikes
    2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    3,563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One thing no one has mentioned is the way the hardshell is attached to the foam of the helmet. On cheaper helmets, the hardshell is typically taped or glued on; on more expensive helmets, its bonded to the foam. I have no idea if this provides any more protection in a crash, but I find that bonded shell helmets tend to last a bit longer. I've had helmets where the taped-on shell begins to peel, or cracks at the edges.
    when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.

    The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
    Cycling irregularly since 2002

  8. #8
    Senior Member RacerX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Left Coast
    Posts
    1,717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by velocipedio
    One thing no one has mentioned is the way the hardshell is attached to the foam of the helmet.
    ?????? It's been mentioned in just about every post.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •