Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Thule Rook Rack Question -

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Thule Rook Rack Question -

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-06, 04:27 AM
  #1  
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
 
georgiaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Morningside - Atlanta
Posts: 1,638

Bikes: 1991 Serotta Colorado II, 1986 Vitus 979, 1971 Juene Classic, 2008 Surly Crosscheck, 1956 Riva Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 39 Posts
Purchasing a Thule Roof Rack System. Basic Rack will consist of 300 Gutter Foot Pack and LB50 Load Bars.

Bicycle: Surly Crosscheck

This is my first time installing a roof rack on my car.

Listed below are three carriers. Which carrier should I choose? After reading the information on the Thule website my first selection would be the 598 Criterium. Makes sense?

Also, if any of you have personal experience with the Thule Roof Rack, please comment.

If you have shopped and know the lowest internet price, please list.

599xtr - Big Mouth Upright


598 - Criterium


591 - Long Tray Classic


Thanks, for taking the time to consider my post.
__________________
Would you like a dream with that?

Last edited by georgiaboy; 02-16-06 at 04:48 AM.
georgiaboy is offline  
Old 05-19-06, 11:10 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I own, and personally prefer the Thule - item three in your post. The bikes seem more secure to me, they are held in place by the same forks that were designed to sustain the forces (greater by far) exerted upon the system when you ride your bike - no arms or clamps around your frame, bikes are held in place much more securely - no chance for them to wobble.

My opinion.

Good luck.

Caruso
Carusoswi is offline  
Old 05-19-06, 11:25 PM
  #3  
Cheers!
 
2wheeled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Woodinville
Posts: 1,284

Bikes: Scott Addict R15, Cadd 9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
With a road bike I would go for the 591 since it's no problem removing the front wheel and clamping to the rack is very secure. For MTB's a would tilt to the other two.
__________________
2wheeled is offline  
Old 05-20-06, 10:35 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
I've been using a Thule roof rack system for about 10 years. I have two of the third type you pictured (They used to call it a Velovise) and a tandem mount. I'm partial to the fork mount type because it's easy to operate with one hand and I think that it holds the bike more stably.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 05-20-06, 11:13 AM
  #5  
Double Secret Probation
 
R900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Eastern Indiana
Posts: 2,578

Bikes: Madone 6 series SSL, Cannondale CX9, Trek TTX, Trek 970, Trek T2000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
We have the 1st and 3rd options. The 1st is nice since you don't need to remove the wheel, but the fork clamp is the best. Very secure and easy. I would add a fairing as well, really cuts down on wind noise.

John
__________________
Time to Ride...
R900 is offline  
Old 05-21-06, 01:38 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have used the big mouth for the last two years - like it alot - works well with all my bikes and my girlfriend's big retro cruiser type bike too.
farrellcollie is offline  
Old 05-22-06, 10:36 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Carusoswi
I own, and personally prefer the Thule - item three in your post. The bikes seem more secure to me, they are held in place by the same forks that were designed to sustain the forces (greater by far) exerted upon the system when you ride your bike - no arms or clamps around your frame, bikes are held in place much more securely - no chance for them to wobble.

My opinion.

Good luck.

Caruso

If the front wheel is removed to allow the fork to be mounted, where do you store the front wheel?

That's to say, if I have 2 bikes and want to use the 591 rack, then where to both of the front wheels go?

Thanks.
cwr2427 is offline  
Old 07-31-06, 03:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cwr2427
If the front wheel is removed to allow the fork to be mounted, where do you store the front wheel?

That's to say, if I have 2 bikes and want to use the 591 rack, then where to both of the front wheels go?

Thanks.
You've probably solved this by now, but the rack includes a pair of pseudo forks into which you clamp your wheels. The forks attach to the bars on the rack. They work just fine.

Caruso
Carusoswi is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 08:12 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,128

Bikes: Rivendell A.Homer Hilsen, Paramount P13, (4) Falcon bicycles, Mondia Special, Rodriguez Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
I used the fork mounts for about 15 years and now use the Big Mouth uprights. Not having to take front wheel off is a big advantage if you have to deal with any of the following conditions:
1. Big tire, narrow rim that requires deflating the tire to get past the brake blocks.
2. Same as 1 where you have to disassemble the front brake.
3. Back of front fender hits tray.
4. Any bike that uses anti-quick release measures on front q/r.
5. Other people's bikes you are unfamiliar with.
6. Small children's bikes or a Trail-a-Bike.

I've had to deal with all these things at one time or another. Once you have the roof rack you become the designated bike hauler for your family and circle of friends.

The fork mounts are secure but I've witnessed two instances where the fork mount q/r let go. When you are riding a bike your weight is pushing down on the axle and the importance of q/r grip only comes into play when you hit a big bump or hop over something and the q/r has to hold the weight of the wheel. On a roof rack the wind coming off your windshield is pushing the bike upward and the q/r mount has to hold the bike down, a lot. When it slips out you are guaranteed some scratched car paint and the need for a new rear bike wheel. I recommend a bungee cord up over the front of the bike as insurance. Anytime you have to deal with carrying bikes with different thickness forks where you have to readjust the q/r tension the opportunity to get it wrong comes up.

The upright mount has its own issues. Where the rubber jaws grip your downtube it can rub your paint off if you have old thin paint or delicate decals. This can be made worse if you don't slip the derailleur cables into the recesses provided in the jaws. When you lift the bike up it weighs more with the front wheel on.
MKahrl is offline  
Old 08-03-06, 10:02 AM
  #10  
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
 
georgiaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Morningside - Atlanta
Posts: 1,638

Bikes: 1991 Serotta Colorado II, 1986 Vitus 979, 1971 Juene Classic, 2008 Surly Crosscheck, 1956 Riva Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 39 Posts
I have used the Criterium as show below for six months. So far, there have been no scratches, abrasions, or chipped paint. No surface marks whatsoever. However, I have been doing what was suggested above in that I have used bungee cords (the strong rubber ones) so that I dont' have to really crank down on the rubber jaws for the attachement. 1 or 2 bungee cords applied to hold the bike downward toward the roof. The rubber jaws then only serve the purpose of a vertical hold.

598 - Criterium
__________________
Would you like a dream with that?
georgiaboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.