Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-06, 10:20 AM   #1
goleador
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
where can I find the average speed of people riding stationaire bikes

hello.

i have been looking for this for all over the net and i haven't been able to find anything

does anybody of you know a site of if you just know the answer to my question please answer it.
my question is, what's the average miles that people do in determined time and resistence? i would like to see a table about it, or something

i do in 30 minuts, 10 miles with a 7 resistence, can u tell me if this is slow, or intermediate or fast
thanks
i reall apreciate your help
goleador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 10:26 AM   #2
kf5nd
Senior Member
 
kf5nd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX 77095
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite, Schwinn Frontier FS MTB, Centurion LeMans (1986)
Posts: 1,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
there is no direct, reliable way to compare.

the only way to make a comparison is to measure the load on the engine, namely, your heart.

if you ride for an hour with your heart rate at, say, 140 BPM, and you cover 17 miles on your bike in your neighborhood

then if you hop and your stationary trainer and keep 140 PBM for an hour, and the stationary bike says, let's say for sake of argument, 12 miles

then you know that in order to convert stationary miles to neighborhood road miles you have to multiple the stationary miles by 17/12, or 1.42

obviously, you need a heart rate monitor, or at the very least a watch with a second hand... and the ability to count and use a calculator
__________________
Peter Wang, LCI
Houston, TX USA
kf5nd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 10:52 AM   #3
Ritehsedad
Tail End Charlie
 
Ritehsedad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maine, The Way Life Should Be
Bikes: Fuji Nevada MTB, Giant OCR1
Posts: 543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
All of the stationary bikes I have ever seen go 0 mph.
__________________
Why isn't 11 pronounced onety one?
Ritehsedad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 01:53 PM   #4
Paul L.
Senior Member
 
Paul L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Arizona, USA
Bikes: Mercier Corvus (commuter), Fila Taos (MTB), Trek 660(Got frame for free and put my LeMans Centurian components on it)
Posts: 2,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritehsedad
All of the stationary bikes I have ever seen go 0 mph.

Of course there was that one that TV's Frank on Mystery Science Theatre 3000 invented that had a drive train connected to wheels on the bottom of the floor bracket of a stationary bike, that one didn't go too fast though. (Or am I thinking of the stair machine he made that went places, or perhaps it was the rowing machine that had a boat put under it and paddles added to the arms so it could go somwhere).
__________________
Sunrise saturday,
I was biking the backroads,
lost in the moment.
Paul L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 03:02 PM   #5
Little Darwin
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Bikes: Many
Posts: 8,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I tend to pedal at between 80 - 90 rpm according to the displays on the exercise bikes I ride. There are a couple of models at my gym, and another in the fitness room of my apartment complex.

I do 12 - 13 mph at a level 3 on one stationary bike...

I do 16 mph on level 3 on another stationary bike...

I do 20 mph on level 4 on yet a third stationary bike...

On each I go for an hour... I have recently started doing 1.5 hours to prepare for Spring.

You won't any meaningful numbers anywhere. The only measurement that is likely to be meaningful to you is if you improve on the same machine.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 03:52 PM   #6
kamoke
Senior Member
 
kamoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: st.johns, NL
Bikes: Trek 1000c, Trek 520.
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritehsedad
All of the stationary bikes I have ever seen go 0 mph.
How about the one in Les Triplettes de Belleville thats connected to the movie screen, which ends up to be more of a ship in the end.
What a good movie.

oh, I don't have any insights to the actual thread topic though..
kamoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 05:39 PM   #7
Machka 
In Real Life
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 46,633
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
I highly doubt that information exists. Every stationary bike is different - there is no consistancy where every single stationary bike in the world has the same "Level 7". Even within the same brand they're different depending on how much the bike has been used, or the year the bicycle was made, or whatever. Also, in the gyms I've frequented over the years half the time half the bikes are broken in some way .... and those Monarch bikes, which I've seen in every gym I've been in, are the worst!! I don't think I've ever seen one operate correctly, or consistantly, or comfortably.



The question does bring something to mind though .... I've been going to gyms for over 20 years now, and I'm currently going to my college gym, and I notice this same thing in every gym .... the people who use the stationary bikes, stair steppers, etc. almost in slow motion!! They sit or stand there flipping through their magazine for 10 or 20 minutes, barely turning the pedals or taking steps or whatever ... so incredibly slowly with practically no resistance. I have to wonder why they even bother to use the machines. Walking around the block would probably raise their heart rate more using the equipment in the gym. Just an observation.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 05:49 PM   #8
'nother
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Bikes: several
Posts: 4,599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka
I highly doubt that information exists. Every stationary bike is different - there is no consistancy where every single stationary bike in the world has the same "Level 7". Even within the same brand they're different depending on how much the bike has been used, or the year the bicycle was made, or whatever. Also, in the gyms I've frequented over the years half the time half the bikes are broken in some way .... and those Monarch bikes, which I've seen in every gym I've been in, are the worst!! I don't think I've ever seen one operate correctly, or consistantly, or comfortably..
I use a rowing machine ("erg") at a local gym and they have the same problem in that "level 7" on one machine is a different actual resistance than "level 7" on another machine . . . however, they are able to measure the actual drag (which changes over time as the components wear, etc.), so it's possible to set up 2 machines for the same amount of drag. They also compute your "effective" distance traveled, taking all of this drag/power output/etc. into account.

There's no reason that idea couldn't also be applied to stationary bikes, spin bikes, etc.. It's actually a little surprising that no one's done that yet, especially with the popularity of Spinning(tm) these days.
'nother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 07:41 PM   #9
Machka 
In Real Life
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 46,633
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'nother
There's no reason that idea couldn't also be applied to stationary bikes, spin bikes, etc.. It's actually a little surprising that no one's done that yet, especially with the popularity of Spinning(tm) these days.
As far as the stationary bikes go, I think there are two reasons why no one has done that yet:

1) The riders who are like the ones I described above -- riding so slow that grass grows faster and more energetically than they pedal -- don't care whether the resistance level on one bike matches that of the next ....... and from my observations there are quite a few people out there like that.

2) A stationary bike, like a LifeCycle, or one of the more expensive ones could probably be calibrated. But those Monarchs (which are everywhere!) can't really be calibrated because the resistance is created by a strap around a flywheel. If that strap has been stretched at all, or is fraying, or if the tightening mechanism is damaged, or whatever, that bike will have a different resistance than the one next to it. And unfortunately I have rarely seen a Monarch with a new strap ... they are all stretched or fraying ... or the tightening mechanisms are damaged.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-06, 09:50 PM   #10
Katrogen
Team BYRDS
 
Katrogen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
Bikes: Specialized Allez Elite Double
Posts: 449
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In my oppinion there will never be an average number or reliable number on any gym stationary bike. I'd get a cyclo computer and trainer for that sort of thing. If you want to enjoy stationary bikes for their benefits (I love them.) then join a spin class! Theres so much more variety in those and you don't have to stare at numbers.
Katrogen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-06, 09:54 PM   #11
slagjumper
Senior Member
 
slagjumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Down on East End Avenue.
Bikes: Salsa Las Cruces, Burley R&R and a boat load of others.
Posts: 1,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katrogen
In my oppinion there will never be an average number or reliable number on any gym stationary bike. I'd get a cyclo computer and trainer for that sort of thing. If you want to enjoy stationary bikes for their benefits (I love them.) then join a spin class! Theres so much more variety in those and you don't have to stare at numbers.
Here is a Monarck Ergo, usually found in University Metabolic Labs. Note the scale and the weight. These are rarely found in health clubs, but the non-ergo models are pretty common. Like Machka said, many of the Monarcks that I have seen in clubs are in pretty bad shape as far as the springs and belts are concerned. I think that people who dont know what they are doing, crank the dials too much and that streches the spring and can mess up the belts. Pedaling backwards can also mess them up.

As I recall the Ergo models read in newton-pounds or some wierd scale like that. You have to calibrate the older ones with seperate weights. Not all Monarchs models are able to produce a quantifiable result.



I have a small Monarch that I got at a goodwill for 7 bucks! It's cool because it is small enough for kids.

Last edited by slagjumper; 03-04-06 at 10:14 PM.
slagjumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-06, 12:46 PM   #12
skiahh
Senior Member
 
skiahh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CO Springs, CO
Bikes: 08 Stumpjumper FSR Expert, 02 Litespeed Tuscany, 04 Specialized S-Works Epic
Posts: 1,035
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka
The question does bring something to mind though .... I've been going to gyms for over 20 years now, and I'm currently going to my college gym, and I notice this same thing in every gym .... the people who use the stationary bikes, stair steppers, etc. almost in slow motion!! They sit or stand there flipping through their magazine for 10 or 20 minutes, barely turning the pedals or taking steps or whatever ... so incredibly slowly with practically no resistance. I have to wonder why they even bother to use the machines. Walking around the block would probably raise their heart rate more using the equipment in the gym. Just an observation.
Yeah, and don't forget the makeup and perfume. Or cell phones! I was at the gym the other night and a lady walked by me reeking of perfume. She had been on a bike or elliptical - not sure - and went over to do some other stuff by the free weight mats. And then another lady came in, got on the elliptical and flipped open her cell phone. She was still talking 35 mins later when I finished up.
skiahh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-06, 01:09 PM   #13
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Comparing average-speed on an exercise bike is much less useful than trying to compare average-speed on a bike in real-world conditions. Since that's really worthless anyway, less than worthless is negative worthlessness?

I think either actual watts/hr generated or calories/hr burned would be better measurements for comparisons. Watts would require a hub or crank-based strain-gauge to measure actual force from pedaling and the computer would integrate with distance & time to come up with watts. Measuring calories burned would require an temperature-isolated chamber to measure total heat output.
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.