Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-22-06, 11:42 PM   #1
hodadmike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hodadmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Bikes:
Posts: 172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Traditional vs. compact sizing

Could someone clear up a newbie question? All my road bikes have traditional flat top tube frames, either 57 or 58 cm. seat tube length. If I wanted a similar fit in a compact frame, generaly speaking, am i looking for a 55 or 56?
hodadmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-06, 11:48 PM   #2
Stubacca
Senior Member
 
Stubacca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oztraylya
Bikes: '03 Fuji Roubaix Pro; '03 KleinGi Attitude; '06 Soma Rush; '04 Surly Cross-Check; '06 Soma Rush; '07 Scott CR1 / Chorus
Posts: 2,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Depends how they measure it. Some manufacturers measure compact frames on the actual seat tube length (which could be center of bottom bracket-to-center or top/seat tube junction, center-to-top of seat tube, or center-to-top edge of top tube), and others give a virtual seat tube measurement (how long the seat tube would be if it intersected with a horizontal top tube).

I'd pay more attention to the virtual top tube length (length that the top tube would be if it were horizontal). For me, that's always been far more important. The compact frames I've felt most comfortable on are those where the virtual top tube length is about the same as the top tube length I ride on a traditional geometry frame.
__________________
Stubacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-06, 12:03 AM   #3
hodadmike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hodadmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Bikes:
Posts: 172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That makes sense, saddle to handlebar measurment would be similar. You could make up any saddle to pedal distance with a longer seatpost.
hodadmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-06, 10:13 AM   #4
onbike 1939
Senior Member
 
onbike 1939's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fife Scotland
Bikes: Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit
Posts: 2,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubacca
Depends how they measure it. Some manufacturers measure compact frames on the actual seat tube length (which could be center of bottom bracket-to-center or top/seat tube junction, center-to-top of seat tube, or center-to-top edge of top tube), and others give a virtual seat tube measurement (how long the seat tube would be if it intersected with a horizontal top tube).

I'd pay more attention to the virtual top tube length (length that the top tube would be if it were horizontal). For me, that's always been far more important. The compact frames I've felt most comfortable on are those where the virtual top tube length is about the same as the top tube length I ride on a traditional geometry frame.
+1
Dead on!
onbike 1939 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 AM.