Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Barbieri Telefonico huhenio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    My Bikes
    Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger
    Posts
    3,522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cranky about cranks ....

    Using PowerCalc to predict performance due changes in crank arm length.

    So I got a hold of a set of 175s in really good shape for 20$. The difference in the actual cranks and my older cranks is that the new ones have the five arm configuration, so changing rings for fine tuning my gear inch development would take 15 minutes versus impossible.

    This are my findings using PoweCalc

    Problem: 7% hill on 74 g.i. is a bit tough

    170 = 51.14 pounds @ pedals @ 52 rpm = 08.00 mph. 291 watts @ pedals

    175 = 51.14 pounds @ pedals @ 36 rpm = 11.22 mph. - 425 watts @ pedals!

    I do not get it I will use less pressure on the pedals, yet wattage increases.


    Problem: 10% hill @ 5 mph on both cases.

    170 = 71.28 pounds @ pedals. 247 watts.

    175 = 68.87 pounds @ pedals. 247 watts.

    Is Wattage a function of pedal pressure?

    In my opinion, it should be . But PowerCalc seems to disagree.

    Who knows this stuff well?
    Giving Haircuts Over The Phone

  2. #2
    45 miles/week Eggplant Jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    2,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This part:

    170 = 51.14 pounds @ pedals @ 52 rpm = 08.00 mph. – 291 watts @ pedals

    175 = 51.14 pounds @ pedals @ 36 rpm = 11.22 mph. - 425 watts @ pedals!

    Is broken. You changed gears in there somewhere. With the same gears, the MPH will be the same at the same crank RPM, no matter how long the cranks are.

    Somehow, while changing the crank length, you also doubled (or halved depending how you look at it) your gear ratio. I.E. you went from 48/18 to 48/9.

    The only thing crank length affects is input torque (which doesn't affect speed because a bicycle has a fixed transmission, no torque-based slippage) and distance travelled by your foot.
    Treasurer, HHCMF Club
    Now living in the land of the cheesesteak.
    But working at a job where I can't surf BikeForums all day any more...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •