tire width and rolling resistance
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 115
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
tire width and rolling resistance
Hi all,
I have a 99 Schwinn Frontier, a low-end mtb (it's a tank!). It suits me fine for getting around the city. When I get some cash, I may get something lighter and with better components.
A few years ago I decided I wanted a bit more speed, so I switched out the stock 1.95" knobbies for 1.75" Michelin semi-slicks. The difference was significant!!
Now I'm thinking about going to 1.25" or 1.5" semi-slicks. The rims are 20mm, I think. I wanted to get some feedback on whether this would be worth it. Would the width difference of 0.25-0.5 be negligible for rolling resistance? I am just doing street riding--some hills (I'm in Seattle), maybe some rough park roads now and then, but nothing more intense than that.
Thanks for any advice!
I have a 99 Schwinn Frontier, a low-end mtb (it's a tank!). It suits me fine for getting around the city. When I get some cash, I may get something lighter and with better components.
A few years ago I decided I wanted a bit more speed, so I switched out the stock 1.95" knobbies for 1.75" Michelin semi-slicks. The difference was significant!!
Now I'm thinking about going to 1.25" or 1.5" semi-slicks. The rims are 20mm, I think. I wanted to get some feedback on whether this would be worth it. Would the width difference of 0.25-0.5 be negligible for rolling resistance? I am just doing street riding--some hills (I'm in Seattle), maybe some rough park roads now and then, but nothing more intense than that.
Thanks for any advice!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,442
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There is a constant debate about this very subject, with some feeling that (at least with road tires) the slightly wider contact patch of a wider tire is offset by the small size of the contact patch fore-and-aft.
We run Continental Town-Country tires on the police bikes at a nominal 1.90 width; but we expect to have to negotiate a bit of off-road as well. (not much....mostly grass)
I would say you would not experience any great jump in performance going from a 1.75 down to a 1.5 or 1.25, as long as they are kept properly inflated. No doubt someone has a table of excruciatingly-exact figures to study.....
We run Continental Town-Country tires on the police bikes at a nominal 1.90 width; but we expect to have to negotiate a bit of off-road as well. (not much....mostly grass)
I would say you would not experience any great jump in performance going from a 1.75 down to a 1.5 or 1.25, as long as they are kept properly inflated. No doubt someone has a table of excruciatingly-exact figures to study.....
#3
Senior Member
Here's a good article: Tire Rolling Resistance
Terry Morse also has a good website on rolling-resistance with tables of data from actual in-the-field testing by Jobst Brandt. Here's a chart that explains it all:
Compare two tyre models of different widths, like Specialized Touring in 25 vs 28c. Or Avocet20 in 25 vs. 28c or Avocet30 in 25 vs. 28c. You'll noticed that in ALL the cases, the wider tyre rolls faster with less resistance at the same pressure. You'll also see that pressure makes a much bigger difference in rolling-resistant than tyre-width. In all cases, the difference is in GRAMS of rolling-resistance.
A bigger factor in your observed results is probably weight and wind-drag. Larger wider tyres block a lot more wind and the faster you ride, the larger wind-resistance contributes to total drag.... which is measured in KILOGRAMS.
Terry Morse also has a good website on rolling-resistance with tables of data from actual in-the-field testing by Jobst Brandt. Here's a chart that explains it all:
Compare two tyre models of different widths, like Specialized Touring in 25 vs 28c. Or Avocet20 in 25 vs. 28c or Avocet30 in 25 vs. 28c. You'll noticed that in ALL the cases, the wider tyre rolls faster with less resistance at the same pressure. You'll also see that pressure makes a much bigger difference in rolling-resistant than tyre-width. In all cases, the difference is in GRAMS of rolling-resistance.
A bigger factor in your observed results is probably weight and wind-drag. Larger wider tyres block a lot more wind and the faster you ride, the larger wind-resistance contributes to total drag.... which is measured in KILOGRAMS.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times
in
89 Posts
It's true, even though it's counter-intuitive: all other things being equal, wider tires have less rolling resistance than narrower tires. BUT, because the amount of air pressure you can safely put into a tire is largely determined by the amount of air volume the tire holds, the narrower tires can be run at higher pressures, which usually more than negates the narrower vs. wider factor, not to mention the amount of wind drag as mentioned above. Bottom line: skinny tires are usually faster when all factors are considered-
#5
Senior Member
Originally Posted by hackybiker
A few years ago I decided I wanted a bit more speed, so I switched out the stock 1.95" knobbies for 1.75" Michelin semi-slicks. The difference was significant!!
Now I'm thinking about going to 1.25" or 1.5" semi-slicks. The rims are 20mm, I think. I wanted to get some feedback on whether this would be worth it. Would the width difference of 0.25-0.5 be negligible for rolling resistance? I am just doing street riding--some hills (I'm in Seattle), maybe some rough park roads now and then, but nothing more intense than that.
Now I'm thinking about going to 1.25" or 1.5" semi-slicks. The rims are 20mm, I think. I wanted to get some feedback on whether this would be worth it. Would the width difference of 0.25-0.5 be negligible for rolling resistance? I am just doing street riding--some hills (I'm in Seattle), maybe some rough park roads now and then, but nothing more intense than that.
I say go for a 1.5" semi-slick, will still give you enough contact-patch at a lower pressure to be able to handle the occasional off-road trip.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 58
Bikes: Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just replaced my 1.95" tires with 1.25". They have some tread, but are not knobby. Neither were the 1.95". I moved from 55 psi to 90 psi. The difference is dramatic. I feel that I am going 40-50% faster. I was cruising at 10-12 mph. Now, I am cruising at 15-18 mph. It is much easier climbing hills. I love them.
Now for the other issue - the first time I rode with the new tires, I hit something small in the bike lane and almost lost it. I over corrected and swerved across three lanes of traffic, finally getting control of my bike in the fast lane. Thankfully, I lost it in a momentary gap in traffic and wasn't killed.
I love my new tires, but I am learning to be a lot more alert about road hazards.
Now for the other issue - the first time I rode with the new tires, I hit something small in the bike lane and almost lost it. I over corrected and swerved across three lanes of traffic, finally getting control of my bike in the fast lane. Thankfully, I lost it in a momentary gap in traffic and wasn't killed.
I love my new tires, but I am learning to be a lot more alert about road hazards.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 115
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks everyone for all the great info and advice! Sounds like the improvement, if any, won't be that huge, so I'm leaning towards just keeping my existing tires for now. And checking the pressure more frequently... I didn't realize pressure was so crucial, though it totally makes sense.