Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-23-03, 02:06 PM   #1
goodcatjack
meh
Thread Starter
 
goodcatjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in the sunny, mindbogglingly humid southeast
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Axis, 2000 Specialized HardRock
Posts: 248
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
how would you compare a century to a marathon, toughness-wise?

I know most people consider the ratio of effort between running and cycling to be around 4/5-ish : 1, depending on the situation, so how does a century compare to a marathon?

I know myself, and I know I'd never be able to do a marathon, but what with cycling being such a different beastie, and with my being able to pop 30-odd miles out without much problem, I feel okay tackling a century later this year.

Opinions on the comparison? Apples and oranges?

-alex.
goodcatjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 02:14 PM   #2
mjrohnso
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd do a century way before a marathon, but they are probably relatively close in effort. But then, i've never done either yet.
mjrohnso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 02:35 PM   #3
deliriou5
It tastes like burning!
 
deliriou5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SOUTH Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 1,014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
marathon is WAY tougher....

i am a triathlete-in training, and that 4/5:1 ratio is pretty dead on.

The thing about a century is that you can do it at a pretty leisurely pace if you wanted. But a marathon saps a whole lot of strength out of you no matter how slow you do it. It is generally known that calorie consumption is pretty constant regardless of speed in running, but because of wind resistance in cycling, calorie consumptions increases exponentially with increased speed
deliriou5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 03:21 PM   #4
Hants Commuter
Senior Member
 
Hants Commuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hampshire UK
Bikes:
Posts: 232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Most definitely a marathon is the much harder to do. I have never run one, though I aspire to. Some of running partners that have and have related their experiences to me.

Although the calorific burn may be 4 or 5 to 1, the repeated shock effect on the legs will become debilitating. You may also develop blisters from the constant rubbing of some item of clothing.

I would not dream of running in a marathon without 4 months of serious training with a weekly mileage of something like 50 + miles a week at its peak.

Do you think you would need to cycle 200 + miles a week in preparation to do a century?
Hants Commuter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 03:42 PM   #5
caloso
Packfodding 3
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Bikes: Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
Posts: 33,751
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
I've never done a century (that's one of this year's goals) but I have run 4 marathons. HantsCommuter is right: for each of those marathons I put in 18 weeks of training and hit a peak of 55miles about 3 weeks before the race. Last year, after doing the Marine Corps in October, I hoped to do my hometown Cal Int'l five weeks later but it was just not enough time to recover and peak again.

I think it's because you're always bearing weight and you recruit other muscles besides your legs to keep you stable. Plus the pounding takes a lot out of you.
caloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 03:48 PM   #6
RWTD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I use to routinely train at marathon distances some years ago though it was at a deserted beach to reduce joint stress.My 140 mi. loaded bike rides last year seemed more difficult than this and the 100 mi. loaded rides easier so maybe something like 120 mi. might seem about equivalent to me.
RWTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 06:18 PM   #7
ZackJones
On Your Right
 
ZackJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've never done a full marathon but I have done the half. I've also done a sub 6 hour century (not the fastest by any means but it took a lot of effort). The 1/2 was much, much tougher. I would like one day run a marathon just so I can say that I've done one but it's way down on the list of things to do

Zack
__________________
"You never fail, you simply produce results. Learn from these" - Anonymous
ZackJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 06:40 PM   #8
MediaCreations 
Marathon Cyclist
 
MediaCreations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Bikes: Road Bike / Mountain Bike
Posts: 1,763
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can - and do - ride all day. I'm happy to ride 200km - but if I run a couple of hundred metres I'm all out of breath.

That's not to say that running is that much harder - just that it's so different for me that I don't even consider running an option.

Maybe I should work on it and build up my running prowess.
__________________
MediaCreations is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 06:50 PM   #9
cbhungry
Jungle lady
 
cbhungry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Bikes: gary fisher cake
Posts: 849
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
definately the marathon is way way harder than a century.
__________________
Ride forever, work whenever.
XX power
Eat more mud, mountain bike 'till you die!

http://www.pnhp.org/
cbhungry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-03, 09:37 PM   #10
RiPHRaPH
Don't Believe the Hype
 
RiPHRaPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: chicagoland area
Bikes: 1999 Steelman SR525, 2002 Lightspeed Ultimate, 1988 Trek 830, 2008 Scott Addict
Posts: 2,585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
there is no coasting while running. running beats you up like nothing else. why do you think that running is last in any tri competition? 5:1...easy.
RiPHRaPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-03, 12:58 AM   #11
Dutchy
We drive on the left.
 
Dutchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Bikes:
Posts: 1,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Try this: On a Saturday morning ride a century, then do another on Sunday. The following week on Saturday run a marathon, and spend Sunday in bed recovering. Pretty easy logic. Cycling can be backed up day after day, running needs a lot of recovery time.

Most professional runners will only compete in a few marathons per year.

CHEERS.

Mark
Dutchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-03, 02:41 AM   #12
nathank
cycle-powered
 
nathank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Posts: 1,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i agree with most of the stuff here...
note: i trained for a marathon in 1998 and was up to 40-something miles/week and did my 18-mile prep run and was on target for a 3:30 or less marathon (goal was 3:10) then developed KNEE problems and i've done a few centuries (i'm more of a mountain biker, but my upcoming race is 105km, with 3500 meters (11,600ft) of climbing and will take me 6 to 7 hours.

the 2 main differences between cnetury and marathon:
* century can be done "slowly" so it is much easier. a marathon is still dificult even if done slowly
* running is MUCH harder on the body and so you need more training to prepare for the beat-up AND more recovery
* b/c of the strain on the body, even most pro marathoners cannot run a marathon 8 or more days in a row - even if they slow their pace. for trained cyclists a century a day is no big deal
nathank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-03, 04:15 AM   #13
trmcgeehan
Senior Member
 
trmcgeehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somerset, KY -- near Lake Cumberland
Bikes: 1980 Univega; 1985 Ross; 1994 Trek 1400 -- all road bikes
Posts: 757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've finished 12 26 mile marathons, and several bike centuries. The marathon takes alot more out of you, because of the constant pounding on your frame. This is especially true if you take over 4 hours to complete the marathon. 3-time Boston winner Bill Rogers once commented that the 4:20 competitor in the back of the pack has it much harder than a 2:20 front-runner, because he has to endure so much longer. The best I ever did was 3:29, when I was 42.
__________________
"I am a true laborer. I earn that I eat, get that I wear, owe no man hate, envy no man's happiness, glad of other men's good, content with my harm." As You Like It, Act 3, Scene 2. Shakespeare.
"Deep down, I'm pretty superficial." Ava Gardner.
trmcgeehan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-03, 05:28 AM   #14
RWTD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dutchy lol When I was into running I use to do marathon distances on Saturday then stay out(running around) all Saturday night and then do the marathon distance again Sunday on zero sleep.In fact zero sleep was my secret weapon as if I slowed down or stopped I would start feeling so lousy by comparison continuing on seemed a much better alternative.Of course this was noncompetive at my own pace on sand and I did spend most of the next two or three days recuperating.And I agree overall with everyone sentiment a competitive marathon is more strenuous than a less competitive century.Of course I was much skinnier then as this was before I started paying much attention to diet/rest/weight training.
RWTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-03, 10:31 AM   #15
bjlaw
Senior Member
 
bjlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Bikes:
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ran 4 marathons 20 years ago and trained hard for them. It took me days to recover after each one till I could walk down stairs normally. I rode my first century 2 years ago and was able to get around easily 1 hour after the ride. Now I'm not a great athlete. My best time in the marathon was 3 hours and 20 minutes. In my century ride I averaged 15 miles per hour.

I feel that a marathon is much more difficult. But the century was much more fun.
__________________
BJ

When victory in battle is assured, time to tighten helmet strap.
bjlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-03, 02:57 PM   #16
juciluci
Senior Member
 
juciluci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ontario,Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
let's see.. i started running about a year befor buying my bike last year.. i did my first metric century the second week i was on my bike and did my first marathon just last september.. i have done metric centuries most weekends and lately done at least one 100 mile ride a month since feb.
however i am training to run an epic 24 race in the rockies first weekend of august.. it is 125kms.. labour day weekend i will ride the same route in a race.. but they only give you 15 hours to complete it.. maybe they think running is harder..lol
i taped the race(deathrace) on oln last summer for my family..lol
they thought i was nuts before.. now after seeing the tape.. they are convinced
i find running more grueling.. not being fast and have arthritis in my back. cycling .. wow sometimes it feel like i could ride forever.. with just the usual aches and pains.
juciluci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-03, 07:11 PM   #17
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Richard Cranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep in the Shawnee Forest
Bikes: LeMond - Gunnar
Posts: 2,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Marathons are harder because there is less "recovery" or "replenishment" of energy for muscle tissue during stride. To simulate bicycling's inherent efficiency , effort levels need to be judged from a "fixed gear" bike with no seat. (or seat post -if that's your thing)
Richard Cranium is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:39 PM.