Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help.. which Hybrid: Trek 7.2FX, 7.3FX, or 7.3FX Disc

    Hello,

    I am just getting back into riding with my wife, who has a Specialized bike. I mainly do the bike paths with little road.

    I am looking at the Trek 7.2, 7.3FX, 7.3 FX with disc brakes. I know the difference between the 7.2 and 7.3 FX is $100 and the difference between the 7.2 and 7.3FX (w/ disc) is $130.

    I am looking for opinions.. are the disc brakes worth it? Is the 7.3 FX a better value with the upgrades vs. the 7.2 FX?

    Should I be looking at another bike?

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Infamous Member chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
    Posts
    24,373
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There really isn't much added value to having disk brakes unless you are constantly riding in wet/winter conditions or bombing down humongous downhills. The 7.3 FX has slightly better components that the 7.2FX, so that's your huckleberry.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  3. #3
    Senior Member bikeutah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    St George, UT
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.5 FX
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless you are riding in an area with consistently bad weather you won't need the disc brakes, IMHO. I agree with chipcom the 7.3 has slightly better components and for the price difference I would go for the 7.3. I have a 7.5 and absolutely love it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.2
    Posts
    103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a 7.2fx and have no problems with it. Although if you can afford the extra $100, it is probably worth it. Let me just say the 7.2fx is a good bike.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    222
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The components on the 7.3 are worth ~$250 more than those on the 7.2. That basically means it will last a little longer without needing to replace anything. If you're planning on using the bike for more than 5 years, and the $100 won't hurt you financially, it's probably worth the upgrade. But it's not a clincher.

    Disc brakes are not a good choice unless you need them (i.e., if you're riding through deep mud, not just rain or snow). They are more difficult to maintain than rim brakes, and rim brakes offer more than enough stopping power.

  6. #6
    Baka dakara supercub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I commute daily on a 7.2FX. It's a fine bike, but I can't say I love it. Feels kind of soulless (if that makes sense). It has no personality. As far as I've noticed, most 7.2FX owners around here give it a mild thumbs up, but aren't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiam. The 7.5 gets more praise, but that's a whole different level of bike.

    Check out the Jamis Coda. Unlike the 7.2, its owners actually seem to love it.

  7. #7
    Feral Member Nicodemus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Roma, Italia
    My Bikes
    yes, I have one.
    Posts
    2,664
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    agreed. 7.3FX. huckleberry.
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson View Post
    Did you just say "minarchist?" I'm going to start a 10-page vaginathon because only Libertarians can define Libertarianism. Also, you're mean.

  8. #8
    PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes dynaryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    dropped and lost in Washington DC
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DevLaVaca
    Disc brakes are not a good choice unless you need them (i.e., if you're riding through deep mud, not just rain or snow). They are more difficult to maintain than rim brakes, and rim brakes offer more than enough stopping power.
    Meh? Discs are much easier to work with than rim brakes. The pads last much longer,you don't have to set up the angle or toe-in when replacing pads,you don't have to worry about your rims being perfectly true,they don't wear on your rims,you don't get brake dust all over your wheels and lower frame,and you don't need to open/close them when removing/installing your wheels. And rim brakes are almost useless in snow,I found that out my first winter commuting.

    To the OP,if you're only going to be riding in nice weather,then the standard 7.3 is a better deal for the component level. If you're thinking about commuting in all weather,get the discs.

    C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport/Qualifier,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L

  9. #9
    The Guadfather Lecterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fart Worth
    My Bikes
    Trek, Centurion, Kuwahara coming soon
    Posts
    1,090
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chipcom
    There really isn't much added value to having disk brakes unless you are constantly riding in wet/winter conditions or bombing down humongous downhills. The 7.3 FX has slightly better components that the 7.2FX, so that's your huckleberry.

    +1, Chipcom makes a good point on the disc brakes part.
    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
    "Minor bun engine, made Benny Lava!!!"

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get the best equipment you are able to afford/willing to spend. I have never heard any complaints about someones ride being too nice. I have friends who have done lots of upgrades to their bikes to solve quality problems. bk

  11. #11
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just bought 2 7.3's this last weekend. These are the first bikes the wife and I have had in years but so far we love them. I kinda wish we had sprung for the disks as we live in Seattle right by Queen Anne hill but I figure by going with out we can upgrade as we please sooner or later.

  12. #12
    ...
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How about the plain Trek 7.5 FX ?
    No disc brakes, but you get the carbon fork.

  13. #13
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the advice everyone.. based upon what you guys were saying, I went ahead last night and ordered a 7.3 FX, paying more for it than the 7.2 because of the additional components.

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love my Jamis Coda! Sturdy and smooth all at once!

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 7.3 & 7.5 FX are listed as fitness bikes in the Trek catalog. Are these bikes also suitable for light trail riding?

  16. #16
    Erectible Member pedalMonger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Enroute
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark5356
    The 7.3 & 7.5 FX are listed as fitness bikes in the Trek catalog. Are these bikes also suitable for light trail riding?
    Probably. I have a Trek FX, I go short distances on packed dirt (and gravel, but that is sketchy) on occasion, and haven't had any probs. Tho these are mostly shortcuts and whatnot, as I use my bike primarily for commuting/transportation. Probably wouldn't be wise to take it on a lengthy trail ride that's more suitable for a mountain bike, unless it was a smooth surface.
    Milky Is The Way
    -----
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] : http://www.gravel2008.us : Democracy.mp3

  17. #17
    user friendly doctortalk121's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    267
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    xxx
    Last edited by doctortalk121; 08-12-07 at 02:30 PM.

  18. #18
    `````````````` CaptainCool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    san jose
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by doctortalk121
    what's the widest tire I could put on one?
    There is a ton of clearance around the tires on my 7.2FX. I'm running 700x28, but there's nearly 3/4" of clearance all around the tire. The rims are 19mm, so Sheldon's chart says you can put 44mm+ tires on them.

  19. #19
    Senior Member edp773's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Illinios
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo
    Posts
    1,143
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by doctortalk121
    regarding the 7.2-7.5 series. I'm thinking about getting one, but have a question. On one of my favorite rides, there is about 1.5 miles of gravel and .5 mile with plain dirt trail. how do the 700x32c tires hold up on it? what's the widest tire I could put on one?
    I have the 2006 7.3FX and it does well on gravel. Dirt should be ok as long as you do not treat the bike like a freerider.
    Born Again Bicyclist! I found my Faith.

    Giant Cypress, GF Wahoo, Trek 7.3FX, Schwinn Sprint

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •