Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-07, 10:27 AM   #1
giorgios
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
giorgios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chicago
Bikes: Rock Lobster, Serotta Coeur d'Acier, Schwinn Varsity, Schwinn Speedster, Schwinn Highplains, Raligh Marathon
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
26.2 vs century

I am curious what you think is hader to train and complete for the first timer. A marathon (26.2 miles) or a century ride (100 miles)?
giorgios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 10:59 AM   #2
RDW3261
Senior Member
 
RDW3261's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Bikes: Trek 1000, Trek Pilot 5.2 and Trek 7100
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have done both. The century I did two months after the marathon and it took me I think all of three weeks of riding a bike to do one. No way a centruy compares to a marathon. I think a century does stand up to a half marathon.
RDW3261 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 12:32 PM   #3
ComPH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Laguna Hills, OC, California
Bikes:
Posts: 265
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree, if that.
ComPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 02:11 PM   #4
CdCf
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not a regular runner, but I've found that a ratio of between 8 and 10 to 1 for cycling vs running feels about right. But then, my longest ride was 200 km and my longest run was 12 km.
CdCf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 02:53 PM   #5
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
In my youth I used to run 15mile cross country and was good at it. My Club entered me in a marathon and I did it in under 3 hours- Did another couple that year, both under 3 hours but did not enjoy them.

Took up riding a lot later- and after a couple of years did a couple of metrics and then a 100 miler. Not really a problem but it was after a couple of years of High milage riding. Marathons or 100 mile rides- If you are fit enough- they are both about the same.

Now if you want a real challenge- 100 miles offroad- Done 10 of them and they are always hard.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 02:57 PM   #6
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Let's see. Years ago in Backpacker Magazine it was asked what is the maximum reasonable pace for packing (with full pack). Their answer was 5 MPH. That translates to a marathon of about 5 1/4 hours.

But would you really call this running a marathon? That is the big problem. There is a line between running and walking, not so in cycling.

Also a lot of marathons are rather flat. A hilly century is more difficult by any measure. But what is considered finishing a flat century is so easy it can be done by someone who has been of the bike for a long long time.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 06:02 PM   #7
dekindy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Let's look at the facts. The 2006 Tour de France was 3,657 kilometers which is about 2,257 miles over 23 days total which is about 100 miles a day and is ridden over largely mountainous terrain. How many marathons could a world class marathoner run over that terrain in 23 days?

If you compare apples to apples in terms of terrain, cycling is much easier. You do not have to support your body weight and you have a machine to help you.

That is why so many organizations are donating bicycles to underprivileged countries. So people can travel longer distances than by walking/running.

I would choose the bike over running anytime.
dekindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 06:03 PM   #8
john bono
Senior Member
 
john bono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 732
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith99
Also a lot of marathons are rather flat. A hilly century is more difficult by any measure. But what is considered finishing a flat century is so easy it can be done by someone who has been of the bike for a long long time.
+1

When it comes to cycling, terrain matters a lot more than it does in running. A hilly 50 miler can be far more difficult than a flat century. I'm not sure that's the case in running, except when the terrain is extremely hilly.
john bono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 06:52 PM   #9
kokomo61
Senior Member
 
kokomo61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
Bikes: Giant OCR C2, Kona Jake the Snake, Scattante 650-R
Posts: 893
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Running takes a much greater toll on the body than cycling does - When I've been tired on the bike, I'm just that-tired. If I run too far, I cramp, get stiff, get blisters, all sorts of nasty things.

Cycling is cooler, though......
__________________
Giant OCR C2
Fuji Cross Pro
Scattante 650-R
'06 Kona Jake the Snake - back to stock, and up for sale.
kokomo61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 08:20 PM   #10
carlton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: corpus christi,texas
Bikes: canondale silk trail
Posts: 347
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A century is a walk in the park compared to running a marathon. Riding a bike is fun. Running is work.
carlton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 08:47 PM   #11
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,996
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 216 Post(s)
I've heard people say that a marathon is more comparable to a double century.

Considering my running ability, I think I would still find the double century easier.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 08:47 PM   #12
adamfresno
YATTA!!!
 
adamfresno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vegas Baby Vegas
Bikes:
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by john bono
+1

When it comes to cycling, terrain matters a lot more than it does in running. A hilly 50 miler can be far more difficult than a flat century. I'm not sure that's the case in running, except when the terrain is extremely hilly.

Terrain always matters. If do our training on flat land for a 26.2 then do a hilly 26.2 things are not going to go as thought.
adamfresno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 09:45 PM   #13
ericgu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Running offers less chance to go easy - you need to run the whole thing.

But with cycling, you have the advantage of slowing down. Riding a century at 12 MPH is a whole lot easier than riding one at 20MPH.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 10:28 PM   #14
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka
I've heard people say that a marathon is more comparable to a double century.

Considering my running ability, I think I would still find the double century easier.
I've done neither a double century nor amarathon, but I've done a couple centuries and probably run as far as 15 miles during training. The centuries seemed easier even than that, and I've been seriously into cycling for about 6 months, whereas I'd been running heavily for four years.

And cycling is just a lot more fun than running. I always feel god after a run (endorphins and such) but cycling I actualy have fun while excercising. For a distance runner, this is quite the novel concept.
M_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 10:48 PM   #15
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
a marathon is a RACE, right? a century is a ride, unless you are in a hundred mile road race.

race running is always going to be more difficult. no chance to coast.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-07, 11:24 PM   #16
Blue Jays
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Bikes: roadbikes and full-suspension mountainbikes
Posts: 1,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think if I woke up tomorrow morning and was told at gunpoint I had to choose between running a marathon in six hours or pedaling 200 miles on a bicycle in only eighteen hours, I'd still opt for the ride!
Blue Jays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 02:07 AM   #17
CdCf
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I could WALK a marathon in six hours! Not sure I could do a double century at all within 18 hours - my back and butt would kill me first.
CdCf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 05:06 AM   #18
Weeks
Pretty Hate Machine
 
Weeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Down in it
Bikes: Bianchi Brava
Posts: 435
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Lance said the hardest physical thing he ever had to do was run the NYC marathon. I think that speaks for itself.
Weeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 05:37 AM   #19
Blue Jays
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Bikes: roadbikes and full-suspension mountainbikes
Posts: 1,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Weeks & CdCf, the comments from Lance Armstrong were what was in my mind when I made my comments. While confident that I would make the distance (not sure of the time ), it seems the "pounding" associated with a 26.2-mile run/jog/walk are what makes it particularly brutal. The knees and hips aren't getting quite as hammered while on the bike.
Blue Jays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 06:04 AM   #20
CdCf
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Walking isn't that "brutal". My normal walking speed is the same speed it would take to finish a marathon in six hours. I've never walked more than about 1/3 marathon though, but that's simply because I've never needed to.
CdCf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 06:38 AM   #21
gcl8a
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
gcl8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Odense, Denmark
Bikes:
Posts: 1,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stapfam
...My Club entered me in a marathon and I did it in under 3 hours...
I hate you.

In a friendly and jealous sort-of way.

---

To the OP: I trained my arse off to run a marathon (in 3.5 hours). I did a century, a mountain century no less, practically on the spur of the moment. No comparison, in my book.
gcl8a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 06:40 AM   #22
gcl8a
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
gcl8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Odense, Denmark
Bikes:
Posts: 1,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weeks
Lance said the hardest physical thing he ever had to do was run the NYC marathon. I think that speaks for itself.
That he's as much a show-man as an athlete? You can't possibly take that quote at face value.
gcl8a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 06:44 AM   #23
gcl8a
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
gcl8a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Odense, Denmark
Bikes:
Posts: 1,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist
a marathon is a RACE, right? a century is a ride, unless you are in a hundred mile road race.
Oh dear, no. At the level of most of us, they're both an 'event'. I have several bib numbers, from both running and cycling, where I have proudly described my tortured inabilities to the nearest second.
gcl8a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 09:43 AM   #24
Garfield Cat
Senior Member
 
Garfield Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Posts: 6,013
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
The comparison between distance running and distance riding can go on forever, just like cross country skiing is to running.

Depending on body type, age, the bike rider spends more time in the activity but with less trauma to joints. Calories burned per hour depends on pace, terrain, and wind conditions.

For me, riding is more fun and the speed thing is certainly there.
Garfield Cat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-07, 10:06 AM   #25
slowandsteady
Faster but still slow
 
slowandsteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006
Posts: 5,979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There is no coasting in running. Let's put it this way. I am overweight and I have no problem doing a century. There is no way I could do a marathon without losing a ton of weight. And even then I would need months of training to do it and not get hurt. Cycling is a lot easier.
slowandsteady is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.